Of course, but the current state plan is the scanners at every gate. There may be details out there about them, but I haven't seen them. I know it's some kind of imaging system.
Of course, but the current state plan is the scanners at every gate. There may be details out there about them, but I haven't seen them. I know it's some kind of imaging system.
there is no scanner I am aware of that detects COVID. You need to swab someone deep his nose and process the sample. This takes a long time (not to mention decontamination after each tested person) and is not proper for an airport where you have a constant flow of people.OK.... but is that what Hawaii is using?
Not sure if you're directing that swipe at me or not, but if so, it's badly misplaced. The only thing I've advocating for the government to do is lay out a play with a target timeline. That timeline would account for what is and is not "doable." And YOUR opinion that something isn't "doable" doesn't make it so. Where there is a will there is often a way, especially when there is money to be made. Perhaps you don't think so, but I believe in 3 months they can get a lot done, and a lot can change, if leadership is capable and up to the task.On one hand, some posters in this forum are requesting a quick open for Hawaii, but then they are proposing solutions which are not doable at this time. You can't have it both ways.
It's certainly not ideal in an airport. But if people know they need a test within 72 hours of departure, that's a different thing all together. Moreover, if the issues/problems with the Abbott ID NOW rapid test are resolved -- which is likely in my opinion -- you'll have a test that produces a complete result in 15 min or less. Abbott says, "We're currently manufacturing 50,000 tests per day, plan to increase ID NOW manufacturing capacity to 2 million tests a month by June and are working to expand beyond that."there is no scanner I am aware of that detects COVID. You need to swab someone deep his nose and process the sample. This takes a long time (not to mention decontamination after each tested person) and is not proper for an airport where you have a constant flow of people.
It's not an interstate commerce issue. It's actually the Privileges and Immunities Clause. But the point is correct.Hawaii does not have the ability to ban travel to the state. That would be interference in interstate commerce. Like every other state, they do have power to regulate the behavior of people once they enter the state, including quarantine. So when travelers arrive, what they can do is decide whom they can allow to enter without quarantine, and who needs to quarantine. Any testing/scanning program will be built around that.
If were in their situation, I think I would be looking to identify testing entities whose results are considered acceptable. I would also be thinking through some protocols. Is it an virus test or antibody test, and how would my response differ? How recent does the test have to be - and that will likely be different if it's an antibody or a virus presence test. What's the probability that it might be a false negative or positive, and under what circumstances should multiple test results be required to address the false postive/negative scenarios?
These are not easy questions and will require some time to set up and vet. But since Hawaii has elected to control COVID by isolation and quarantine techniques, those are critical questions to answer.
I agree - I thought from you other posts that you wanted them to open much earlier, like this summer.Perhaps you don't think so, but I believe in 3 months they can get a lot done, and a lot can change, if leadership is capable and up to the task.
No doubt, if the only testing were upon arrival, that would be a challenge. But I believe the suggestion I read (Lt. Gov. I believe) was that people could choose, get tested within 3 days before leaving, or wait at the airport for up to 12 hours to get tested upon arrival. Or quarantine. I suspect few would opt for the latter two. Not a lot of upsides.It is unclear to me how testing can be accomplished upon landing without creating huge crowds on the airport. To me it makes more sense to demand testing 2-3 days before departure and only ask those that do not have a valid certificate to be tested in Hawaii.
Sure, but "at least 2 months" from when? That certainly covers and largely rules out June and July. No surprise there. But does that suggest that they COULD be ready as early as August if they act promptly? The point is simply that it's not clear, based on public statements, what their timeline is. And statements like that suggest that if they move along with a sense of urgency, they can be ready sooner (2-3 months) rather than later.Hmmm - 10 days ago the State Legislature voted to spend $37 million on airport testing and said it would take AT LEAST 2 months - that seems pretty clear to me. At this point in time, it seems like it would be premature to announce a date, since I doubt if the equipment has even landed on island yet. YMMV
I'd love for them to be able to open this summer, but that seems a bridge too far with respect to tourism and people coming from outside Hawaii. I've never said I EXPECTED that they'd be open this summer. I've thought at all times about Sept. 1 is a realistic goal, possibly August (that was before they said they wanted thermal scanners). The infrastructure for the paperwork, procedures, quarantine set up, etc., takes some time. But, again, assuming it takes about 60 days for the hotels to be ready, it would be nice if they give a 60-day heads up.I agree - I thought from you other posts that you wanted them to open much earlier, like this summer.
RE: Timeline - the Govt. spokesman said that the earliest they can have the equipment installed is 2 mos. There's your preliminary timeline. Since they may not even have the equpment yet, publishing a detailed timeline now, would be premature, but once they get started and see how the installation goes, I'm confident that they will release more info to the public. YMMV
Southwest Air will be resuming flights in July:
Southwest Hawaii Stiffens Competition: 11 New Daily Flights Exposed
Lastest news on Southwest schedules and fares. Some routes continue to have great deals for summer. Find out more in today's post.beatofhawaii.com
I'm curious on the view of an admitted pessimist...Assuming...
And yet they don’t define the “new normal”.
More importantly, it seems they are aware that
So I hope they really are prepared for this.
It’s still way too early to know how they really will implement tourist visits.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I'm curious on the view of an admitted pessimist...
Keeping in mind that we'll no doubt have:
what makes you think that restarting tourism will result in a BIGGER COVID problem than what they had in March/April?
- some kind of testing
- social distancing
- face masks
- hand washing
- hand and facility sanitizing
- no buffets and other risky serving
- reduced restaurant capacities and safety protocols
- limited groups/crowds, and, finally,
- perhaps only 15-20% the number of tourists that were coming in February and early March
There is a complete loss of perspective by so many it shocks me. And I'm not cavalier at all. But, really, with 30,000 tourists per DAY coming in from all over the world in February and into March, with no testing at all, no extra efforts at sanitation or hand washing, no contact tracing, and no mitigation efforts whatsoever, not even a clue there was a contagious disease that spreads without symptoms, the entire state of Hawaii had fewer than 700 cases in 3 months, and only 17 fatalities. Again, for perspective, what was the reduction in auto fatalities during the shutdown? (https://hidot.hawaii.gov/highways/safe-communites/ There were 17 in Jan-Feb. April 4. Don't have May yet. It may be that COVID saved as many lives as it took.)
If I was betting the OVER/UNDER on number of cases in October - December, I'd put the number at perhaps 300 and I'd take the under.
I'm curious on the view of an admitted pessimist...
Keeping in mind that we'll no doubt have:
what makes you think that restarting tourism will result in a BIGGER COVID problem than what they had in March/April?
- some kind of testing
- social distancing
- face masks
- hand washing
- hand and facility sanitizing
- no buffets and other risky serving
- reduced restaurant capacities and safety protocols
- limited groups/crowds, and, finally,
- perhaps only 15-20% the number of tourists that were coming in February and early March
There is a complete loss of perspective by so many it shocks me. And I'm not cavalier at all. But, really, with 30,000 tourists per DAY coming in from all over the world in February and into March, with no testing at all, no extra efforts at sanitation or hand washing, no contact tracing, and no mitigation efforts whatsoever, not even a clue there was a contagious disease that spreads without symptoms, the entire state of Hawaii had fewer than 700 cases in 3 months, and only 17 fatalities. Again, for perspective, what was the reduction in auto fatalities during the shutdown? (https://hidot.hawaii.gov/highways/safe-communites/ There were 17 in Jan-Feb. April 4. Don't have May yet. It may be that COVID saved as many lives as it took.)
If I was betting the OVER/UNDER on number of cases in October - December, I'd put the number at perhaps 300 and I'd take the under.
This is where I disagree. The KNOWN threat, yes. But if you think there were only "a couple of cases in February" in the US, you're fooling yourself. There were probably thousands or tens of thousands. I suspect some of the "flu" and "pneumonia" deaths in January and February were in fact COVID. But we had no test for COVID, and almost no medical understanding of it, at that time. Given the lengthy incubation time, the amount of asymptomatic infection and spread, and lower mortality rate than first thought, I believe history will show a very different story. With a 0.5% mortality rate you need 200 cases to get a single death. With a 30-60 day lag between initial infection -> incubation -> hospitalization -> death, you have many 1000's of infections before you record that very first death. Now add exponential growth with an R0 of 1.9, and, those 1000's of patients with it before the first death, and you have an out of control wildfire of spread before the first patient died.The virus at this time was not full blown in the rest of the United States. New York, the center of the virus in the US only had a couple of cases in February and didn't start to really go up until late March. The threat from outside of Hawaii is much greater than in February and early March.
what makes you think that restarting tourism will result in a BIGGER COVID problem than what they had in March/April?
News about the pilot project to allow Japanese visitors first. I'd be curious to know if the hotels are thrilled about the idea to reopen but have a 10-15% occupancy, they may still bleed money. The same for other businesses. I am sure those that own timeshares in Hawaii are not going to be thrilled about this. So you have paid maintenance fees (and local taxes) for years and you are told that someone from Japan will be allowed but not you.
maybe but there is no guarantee that Japan will not have a second waveIt makes perfect sense to restrict access to those regions which have successfully flattened the curve, reduced the Rt rate significantly, and testing in sufficient numbers. The continental US has not done that, so not sure why anyone would think they should be admitted before, or with, others that have done so. I applaud Hawaii for even considering such an option, since I’m sure they realize how that may appear to the rest of the country.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk