Are they really though...or is this just another way for people to justify paying exorbitant MF fees?
For the sake of argument, I would concur that they are often nicer units...but 2-3 times nicer ( in comparison with paying 2-3 times the MFs that would be paid at Worldmark)? It seems like Worldmark owners seem to have similar trading power on RCI or II, and if they are staying at a Marriott or Starwood property, Who is getting the better deal?
I often compare what I can see on II with Worldmark (2BR) and WMH (gold plus 2BR). I can say that Worldmark has much BETTER trading power than WMH, especially after starwood changed their trading rule. The only benefit of WMH is 3 days starwood priority. When I could see Marriotts (even in Hawaii) with Worldmark, WMH could not see them.
For domestic exchanges, Worldmark has a little stronger power than WMH. For international exchanges, Worldmark is much better than WMH.
For about the MF, I pay $1,000/year for 20,000 worldmark credits (it is equal to two prime season 2BR), and I pay $1,500 PLUS real estate tax (around $140/year) for WMH.
I have never stayed at worldmark resort, but I exchanged my worldmark points to Royal Sands (summer), Westin Lagunamar, many Marriotts and DVC. So the resort quality of Worldmark isn't matter for me.
Last edited: