- Joined
- Jun 6, 2005
- Messages
- 4,507
- Reaction score
- 3,968
This is a good article about the impact of financial crisis on health. It says: ...a rise in deaths linked to long-term economic hardship — suicide, overdoses and the like — has caused devastation in communities across the middle of the country, leading to a troubling recent decline in U.S. life expectancy. Economic prosperity is a matter of public health, too — the necessary condition for it, in fact. The United States must respond to the coronavirus accordingly.
Keep in mind that the Washington Post is liberal. For them to be arguing that economic prosperity is a necessary condition for public health and the the USA should respond accordingly says a lot. I keep thinking that the "cure" for the coronavirus is worse than the virus itself.
Here we go again. The Washington Post has the reputation of being one of the finest investigative papers in the country one of few. Just because they print news that a certain individual does want to hear does not make them liberal. If you want to talk about their editorial page I might say they lean liberal as does the market they serve, but those are opinions like you linked to.
I will ask how much stress would there be if the death total reaches 2,2 million which is what is modeled if we do nothing.
The one thing I can guarantee is that the governors who are making these decisions have considered economic pain. They like to get re elected. I will continue to believe the experts like Dr Fauci that warn of dire consequences if we do not do this. As a member of a group that does have higher risk I appeciate these efforts as I would like to continue seeing my grandkids after this is over.