duplicated by accident, deleted by me
Last edited:
Prepare to be surprised.
I'm betting the program isn't going to generate ANY sales comissions for the sales staff. Instead, it's going to put people in the seat for them to take a shot at increasing their ownership. I'd bet Marriott puts something in the way of an incentive to get owners to buy, much like they've been doing in the recent past.
Please try to find out the answer to the $100MM question... how does the inventory get allocated to the points system versus weeks.
For example - say a resort has 2 seasons. Gold is 1-26 and Platinum is 27-52. Now half of the Platinum convert to points... do they (i) take half of each week from 27-52 into the points system? (ii) take the deeded weeks of those who converted to the points system. (iii) do they take the most desirable weeks to the points system (say all July, August, and holiday weeks).
If you can't get a straight answer, we'll have good reason to suspect there is some monkey business going on...
I will try. Although disguised as an information session, I expect it to be a sales pitch with at least some level of pressure (although I was told it would not be). The part on the ability to cancel was based on the fact that I know my wife will not be a fan of going to this. I tried to schedule this "alone", but no dice....
Perry: Loved your comments to me on a previous post. :rofl:
I dont think this will be true. A company wont (I should say shouldnt) ask their sales people to spend several hours a day to get owners to sign up for the new system and not get a penny out of it. Unless the reps are going to be told not to worry about current owner conversions and Marriott will handle them over the phone or something.
Have you ever sold on purely commission basis or managed those who do?
Marriott is a hugely successful sales company - they sell reservations to hotel rooms that, most of the time, they don't own, they just manage and get a commission for doing so.
When folks talk about a sales company not offering commissions to their salesreps and magically that makes things better I question that logic.
If I were in Marriott's shoes and had to release this new sales system next week I would want it to go viral among the owners and that means enthusiastic salesreps who can trade in their 5-series BMW for a 7-series BMW and that means HUGE commissions.
It's the salesreps that will make or break this new sales system - for Marriott to hold hands with their owners and leave the salesreps to sit aside and hum Kumbaya is ludicrous to me.
I would expect the salesreps to work so hard that they have crashes in their 5-series BMW, get the insurance money and upgrade to a 7-series.
But that's just me...
I'm not sure why folks are expecting that owners will NEED to sit through a sales presentation in order to be able to join whatever new system might be rolled out. We're almost halfway through this year and a whole lot of owners have already used their weeks, haven't they? (We have.) Plus our sales rep in Hilton Head has already told us to email or call her with any questions when it's rolled out. She didn't say anything at all about seeing us again in the near future.
I don't think Marriott is going to expect any of us to schedule separate time from our owned weeks, using cash or MRP rentals, just to visit with our sales reps for this. It appears they'll have to set it up as a "from home" email/telephone offer if they want participation from as many owners as possible.
Sure they will. It happens more often than you know. Sales is a numbers game. The more people you talk to, the greater the number of sales you'll make. Current owners are so much better prospects than Joe Tourist off the street coming in for a free gift. The conversion is what will get people back into the sales room instead of the free gift AND, it's getting better qualified prospects into the sales room AND it's getting people back into the saleroom who have purchased before. If we are to believe the numbers, which indicate only a small percentage are resale buyers, they'll be getting people who have purchased direct from Marriott back onto the sales floor. Add to this a program that Marriott is certain will have great appeal to it's owners and it's likely to be akin to shooting fish in a barrel for the really good salesmen.
Please try to find out the answer to the $100MM question... how does the inventory get allocated to the points system versus weeks.
For example - say a resort has 2 seasons. Gold is 1-26 and Platinum is 27-52. Now half of the Platinum convert to points... do they (i) take half of each week from 27-52 into the points system? (ii) take the deeded weeks of those who converted to the points system. (iii) do they take the most desirable weeks to the points system (say all July, August, and holiday weeks).
If you can't get a straight answer, we'll have good reason to suspect there is some monkey business going on...
I know this isn't definitive but, my guess is it will be like other mixed use resorts. There are X number of points based ownership and X number of weeks based ownership for each season. As reservations are made, the tally is kept. If there are 100 points based weeks available once those weeks are reserved thats all that's available for that resort. My bet is it will still be first come, first served.
What will be tricky is if they give points based reseravtions a head start on reserving their weeks. While anything is possible, I don't see Marriott doing that to the weeks based owners. I could see some sort of multi week priority given for reservations like what Marriott currently does (13 months rather than 12 months).
Honestly, I own in a mixed use system and it's not been an issue for either owners in the weeks based reservations system or the points based reservations system. Contrary to the fear mongering that's gone on in this thread, I don't believe it will ever be the problem a few posters are trying to make it out to be.
In my opinion this is the biggest hotbutton issue and should not be underestimated.
Think of the 13 month rule. Would any high demand week be available to single week owners if inventory wasn't allocated in a somewhat fair manner. They make 50% of inventory available to the 13 month window, but even that is not enough, right? It has to be 50% of each week for it to work somewhat properly, otherwise all the good ski weeks will still be gone at 13 months, all summer NCV weeks, will be gone at 13 months etc.
It is no different here - you have a new class of owners that has to have their inventory maintained separately. The way described by Doug26364 above, it leaves open the theoretical possibility that points owners may get all the good weeks in a season or vice versa. IMO inventory has to be completely separated, and in a fair manner, for this to even have a remote chance of working properly.
"Fair manner" would be that if 22% of owners in a particular season convert, they take 22% of each week in that season for the points system reservations. It's fair because (i) it's hard to point out otherwise , and (ii) any other manner has the potential to put some class of owners at a disadvantage.
The conversion is simply replacing the free gift. What's so hard to understand about that logic?
Have you ever set a trap? Did you put the trap out empty or did you put bait in the trap? If you set an empty trap, you'll get very little. Put something of interest in there to get people sniffing around and now you've got something.
A salesman sells. Bring a salesman all the qualified buyers he can see in a day.....every day......and he'll be in hog heaven. The most difficult part of selling isn't selling, it's getting qualified prospects in front of you to sell. This will get all the qualified prospects they can handle in front of them for the next several years.
OMG the word Fair and Timeshare Developer in the same sentence?
Marriott is going to play by the rules and take all 13 month "hot" weeks before any owner who decides to not join.
Same with the 12 month inventory.
Show me the words "Fair" in any of the documents that spell out how Marriott and the non-joining members interact. I can't wait....
I have no doubt they may do this when it comes to the weeks they need to secure for themselves (e.g. from point conversions).
As to the balance between weeks and points, they probably need to tread more carefully on that front. Playing favorites is a dangerous game...
If Marriott is using the latest sales tools then they will hold webinars like crazy. Limit each to 1,000 owners and set up 2-hr slots and let folks just sign up and learn the new system.
I attend webinars daily and they always involve selling a product or service and about 1,000 folks seems to be what they shoot for.
Because of real estate laws they probably can't take orders on the internet and require a sales tour to sell them face to face; but the heavy lifting of educating 400,000 owners should be by webinar.
But who knows...
In my opinion this is the biggest hotbutton issue and should not be underestimated.
Think of the 13 month rule. Would any high demand week be available to single week owners if inventory wasn't allocated in a somewhat fair manner. They make 50% of inventory available to the 13 month window, but even that is not enough, right? It has to be 50% of each week for it to work somewhat properly, otherwise all the good ski weeks will still be gone at 13 months, all summer NCV weeks, will be gone at 13 months etc.
It is no different here - you have a new class of owners that has to have their inventory maintained separately. The way described by Doug26364 above, it leaves open the theoretical possibility that points owners may get all the good weeks in a season or vice versa. IMO inventory has to be completely separated, and in a fair manner, for this to even have a remote chance of working properly.
"Fair manner" would be that if 22% of owners in a particular season convert, they take 22% of each week in that season for the points system reservations. It's fair because (i) it's hard to point out otherwise , and (ii) any other manner has the potential to put some class of owners at a disadvantage.
But what I'm saying is, our sales rep didn't give any indication that it will be necessary to talk to her at all! She said we can call/email her IF we have questions when we're notified, which makes me think that this will be offered to us the same way as other promotions, in email or snail mail. She just didn't give us the impression that some of you have, that it's going to require a sales associate's assistance and/or that they'll be inspired by commissions for conversions of existing weeks.
But I don't expect a problem with them doing that - has there ever been any indication that they've played fast and loose with the 12/13-month inventory?
I can't really answer that since I don't have access to their computer systems. By default that makes the answer to your question a "No".
The "smell test" will be what Marriott says about the handling of inventory, how consistent it is, and what they are willing to put in writing.
My opinion is that this will be a sensitive issue and we won't get a clear cut answer... I can't even see how anyone would consider converting without knowing how the inventory is allocated - I mean putting razzle and dazzle aside, how does this really work? I hope we get more transparency than that but, as Perry would probably say, transparency from a developer may be an oxymoron.
But what I'm saying is, our sales rep didn't give any indication that it will be necessary to talk to her at all! She said we can call/email her IF we have questions when we're notified, which makes me think that this will be offered to us the same way as other promotions, in email or snail mail. She just didn't give us the impression that some of you have, that it's going to require a sales associate's assistance and/or that they'll be inspired by commissions for conversions of existing weeks.
Why are some so willing to believe that they'll finagle it purposely to hurt the folks who don't convert? What is in their past history to lead to that expectation?
...The only thing they'll HAVE to sell me on is that whatever gets rolled out works better for me.