I just saw that trend on Twitter. Looks like the teachers are doubling down. In all fairness, they do raise some valid concerns. They seem to be asking "how" they can safely return to the classroom and remain safe? Seems like several of the districts need to step up their communications plans to answer some of their teachers questions and include them in developing their reopening procedures. Schools have been reopened all over the world with good results. I'm confident we can do it here also, but we really need to give the teachers a seat at the table as we plan this out. We can't do it without them.
With respect to this aspect, many districts took the approach of waiting for their respect state's DOE to issue reopening guidelines and procedures thinking it would be senseless to make local level policies that would likely have to be modified (if not completely revamped) when the DOE issues their guidelines and procedures.
And when state DOE's finally issued something on this matter, the guidelines and procedures were feckless - at best.
So now, with most of the summer essentially wasted, local school boards are now in a scramble mode to figure out what to do.
How many students will be returning to school this fall?
What does returning to school mean
for each student specifically? In class attendance? Distance learning only?
A few districts have issued cut off dates by which parents must declare 1) is/are their student/s returning this year and 2) in person or remote and 3) with the understanding this decision cannot be changed
from remote
to in-person until the semester break.
What happens to the student whose parent
does not reply to this deadline for a decision?
Can a school district deny that student admission to the district? Should a district be able to deny a student admission to a district on this basis (allowing for reasonable exceptions - best example family moves)?
Even if such a policy were allowed, far too many school boards and superintendents only want to
increase student counts - by any manner available - to obtain more state and federal money.
While I could continue on, let me point out what our state DOE should mandate but - thus far - has failed to issue
and that is a drastic cut in class sizes to increase social distancing.
It CAN be done - but it will not be easy. It will take money - and that money will need to comes from some place - but it can be done. It will take some innovative thinking - which the education sector claims to be in favor of while concurrently being among the most restrictive environments in which to innovate.
Here is a specific example (albeit limited to the elementary level).
While these numbers might vary from state to state, in general the maximum number of students allowed per class is as follows:
Kindergarten: 20 students per class (22 with a 1/2 time aide)
1 - 3: district average 23 students per grade per class average with no more than 25 in any one classroom
4: district average 25 students per grade per class average with no more than 28 in any one classroom
These numbers need to be reduced by at least one-third if social distancing in a classroom is to be achieved.
I have yet to see any state DOE mandate that.