• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 30th anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $23,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $23 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Marriott Destination Points...They have done it!!!!!! {Merged}

BocaBum99

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
4
Location
Boca Raton, FL
No way. I bought this when this was being spread on the board a few days ago, and I finally realized that this is wrong. Marriott cannot create new demand out of thin air. They are not going to have 1 million new points owners overnight AND the point owners that they get are going to try for a lot less prime weeks because they could not afford the 7000 points for a prime week in Maui. So, unlike in the past where every Marriott week owner would try to get the top weeks, now....many of them will try for less exciting weeks because they want to stretch their points.

So, what will Marriott do with the rest of their prime inventory? They will try to rent it. Yeah....and? They have always been trying to rent their prime inventory. They charge too much. THey have to. It would take away from their brand name if they did not charge 3x as much for a 2 bedroom Villa as opposed to a Hotel Room. So, they can try renting until they are blue in the face. They will not get that many takers at those prices.

So, now what? Marriott has exhausted rentals and their points owners, and they still have lots of inventory. Where will it go? The only place that Marriott can drop it where they do not get egg on their face (by renting it cheap) is Interval. So, Interval weeks will still get plenty of inventory for the forseeable future.

Yes, your conclusion is correct that Interval will continue to get deposits. Unfortunately, it will be more of the leftovers after the points members have picked it over, though.

Prior to this system, Marriott would randonly put out inventory into Interval. If it were a prime week, for 24 hours after that deposit was made, saavy exchangers could grab it. Now, that inventory will be held in a points pool and made visible to all points owners for an extended period of time. So, it will be grabbed in a much larger window. What is left will truly be leftovers.

It is for the reasons you raise that I thought for sure that Marriott would have it's own bonus time/open season/Flexchange option. The fact that they didn't do it is leaving lots of money on the table. It is one of their biggest mistakes in creating this program.

The biggest mistake is the points skimming. That was just stupid and now a PR nightmare that they need to address. They could have easily solved this problem by increasing the total maintenance fees by 7% and giving owners equal value in points exchange. That's all they would have to do. If I were the CEO of the Vacation Ownership business unit, a product manager would be losing their job over that gaffe.
 

RedDogSD

TUG Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
823
Reaction score
0
Location
Southern California
Yes, your conclusion is correct that Interval will continue to get deposits. Unfortunately, it will be more of the leftovers after the points members have picked it over, though.

.

This is not a problem. Yes, you are right that the points owners will have picked through the inventory. However, the points program will make smarter owners and they will not be wililng to give up their points so easily.

Go to a car dealership. They trade points (known as Cash) and see what is available. Usually, the cars that are great deals are hard to get. The expensive, top cars are always there. You can pick up a top of the line Corvette easily. The cheapest model Camaro with the V-6 is hard to find. Why? People do not think the Corvette is worth the money or they need to stretch their money for other things. Same with Timeshares and points. Any points owners who sat through the presentation in Florida will be excited to know that they only need to buy 2000 points to come back. How are they going to talk him into buying 7000 points? Not many will buy that many. The rest will be excited enough to know that they can bank their points a few times and get to Hawaii once every few years. Sure, there will be some people who buy the big packages. They could have done that before. We bought our first Ko'Olina property when we were touring Newport. They always cross-sold. Now they just sell points.
 

curbysplace

TUG Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
311
Reaction score
25
Location
Sioux Falls
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grand Chateau, Marriott Streamside-Birch, Marriott Custom House
Initially I was very skeptical on how the new point system would work. I agree with the general sentiment expressed on TUG over the last few months--that why should we enrich Marriott Inc at our expense just because Marriott chooses to change its system for its own profit and benefit. Then after talking with several different Marriott folks on Monday and Tuesday and asking questions, the majority of which had to be taken up to a supervisor for the answer, I decided to see how the dollars of the program would pencil out for me. I am seriously considering biting the bullet and buying into the club points program. By the way the Marriott representatives were all quite surprised that I knew so much about the system when it had just “rolled out” that day. A hats off to all you TUGGERS for the great discussion leading up to this massive change by Marriott.

Putting pencil to paper here is what I found if I join the system. I would buy into the club points program for the $1,995 initial joining fee and pay the annual $199 club fee. This then (1) eliminates my $89 annual II fee; (2) eliminates my $75 lockoff fee; (3) when exchanging my 2 fixed weeks and my 3 bdrm lock off to another Marriott or staying at my home resort in other than my 2 fixed weeks eliminates another $397 (I have not yet stayed in my fixed weeks or the floating 3 bdrm unit, always exchanging) I am ahead $362 in the first year. This doesn't include any fees to II to upgrade or re-booking a 1 bdrm reservation to a 2 or 3 bdrm unit or any cancellation fee, etc. Even without ever using club points to trade and sticking with Marriott / II to trade internally to another Marriott or my home resort as I do now, I break even in 5 ½ years and will always have the option to use the point-based exchanges if it is beneficial to me. I also meet the threshold for the premier status (13-month reservation availability).

Yes there is some point dilution at my home resorts–but the 800 point bonus for signing up will, at least in my case essentially absorb the dilution for at least 3 to 5 years providing I can maneuver the points that long.

I will also be able to get a refund of my II fees paid through August 2013 which should be at least$250. If I do not elect the refund I was told I get two bonus weeks up front and a third bonus week in 2013.

Everyone has to make up his or her own mind on this. Everyone has different factors and circumstances to consider. If all you do is stay in your home resort, then there is no reason to join. If you have only one unit you may come continue life as before trading through II as in the past. As for me, I will ask more questions, re-compute the dollars and cents of the deal and make a final determination whether or not it makes financial sense for me to put out $1,995 to buy into the program.


One nagging thing that bothers me is why there is any differential in the joining fee between developer sold weeks and third party resale weeks. I know there was some discussion of this earlier so if this is a repeat of something previously discussed I apologize. The $1,300 differential I will have to pay to join the club point program doesn’t make any sense. When the developer initially sold the week they got the money from the sale and the sales force received its commission. This is akin to an Initial Public Offering or IPO on the stock market. When I bought a week from a third party, why should Marriott care. My penalty for buying third party that is not being able to trade my week(s) for Marriott reward points (which is unwarranted but I can accept that). Just like buying and selling stocks on the stock market after the IPO, it doesn’t change the amount the company gets. If Marriott really wanted a week to resell to make another margin on the sale and provide its sales force with another commission, it could have taken the unit by exercising its ROFR which it chose not to do.
 
Last edited:

Numismatist

TUG Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
788
Reaction score
5
Location
Coast of Maine
Did anyone see this:

quote The points value of my enrolled week(s) and the points required to occupy any particular resort are subject to change.
endquote

at the bottom of the points screen?

So...I'm guessing MY points will go DOWN and the points I need to occupy will go UP...
 

RandR

TUG Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
327
Reaction score
2
Location
Great Neck
I am not the one who originally brought up the gaming of the system using the Sun - Thurs reservations. This was brought up many hundreds of posts ago. Many were saying that they get less points for their week than it takes to book a like for like trade. That is when someone said the way around it is to just book Sun - Thurs which use less points and you will get more than your 7 days overall. My point was that there seems to be a big gap between weekday and weekend nights and people my think they can exploit that. They should be fooled though since the points are very likely to be reallocated between days and the ability to get 7 or more days with your points may go away.
 

RedDogSD

TUG Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
823
Reaction score
0
Location
Southern California
Did anyone see this:

quote The points value of my enrolled week(s) and the points required to occupy any particular resort are subject to change.
endquote

at the bottom of the points screen?

So...I'm guessing MY points will go DOWN and the points I need to occupy will go UP...

Maybe, but it could go the other way. They will look at the demand for your property (requests from their points owners) and their supply. If they cannot accomodate the requests of their owners and are making them unhappy, they may decide to give you more points for your week to get them more supply. Of course, they also could increase the number of points it takes to trade into your resort which will decrease demand. Either way works for them, but one way really screws you and one way helps you.

I am not the one who originally brought up the gaming of the system using the Sun - Thurs reservations. This was brought up many hundreds of posts ago. Many were saying that they get less points for their week than it takes to book a like for like trade. That is when someone said the way around it is to just book Sun - Thurs which use less points and you will get more than your 7 days overall. My point was that there seems to be a big gap between weekday and weekend nights and people my think they can exploit that. They should be fooled though since the points are very likely to be reallocated between days and the ability to get 7 or more days with your points may go away.

Yep, they will re-allocate it if they need to. I think the big gap is because their research says that they can easily rent the weekends, so they want to discourage you from booking them, or at least make you pay big bucks if you do book a weekend day. If they find themselves with too many un-rented weekend days, they will re-allocate the points. If too many people are taking advantage of the Su-Th and they keep getting empty weekends that they cannot rent but no Su-Th nights to join them to, they will increase the points needed on Su - Th.
 

wuv pooh

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
530
Reaction score
148
Location
NOVA
But why would I pay a $700 enrollment fee when I can already do everything I want to do through Interval? I'm not saying that the plan is inherently bad, or that it wouldn't be beneficial for some, I'm just disputing the fact that it's advantageous to everyone who is interested in exchanging. Aside from the enrollment fee, the annual fee for the new points program is more than twice what we pay annually for Interval membership.

The way I see it, joining the new program means that I'm paying more money for options that I don't want. I don't want to do shorter vacations, and I don't want to trade my Waiohai week for another US Marriott resort.

We actually go to Orlando five to six times a year, and always stay at Vacation Club resorts, but we just pay out of pocket. In the last nine months we've booked two bedroom units at three different Orlando properties, and we've never paid more than $160 a night (and that was during Thanksgiving week, Christmas week, and Spring Break). We currently have a reservation for a one-bedroom villa at Grande Vista for the last week of July for $110 a night. I'm not going to trade my Waiohai week or roll it to points to use at Grande Vista when they're practically giving rooms away.

Currently you pay $89 for II and $109 to trade to another resort. That is higher than the new fee. You are correct that if you occupy only then you will save $76 per year and not pay the enrollment fee. The enrollment fee is partially offset by 800 points, so that will reduce some of the cost. If you do not enroll then you will not have access to the new points currency. No one currently knows whether this access will be valuable or not. Next year they could devalue your points or they could add a flexchange option giving weeks for 500 or 1,000 points that could be very valuable.

For most, it will be better to enroll because they will have hard savings from their current fees and future options in the new program that Marriott is pushing. For example I will save over $200 per year by paying one fee so my payback will be very quick.

Since your usage does not provide a fee payback then you only have to decide if you want to pay to keep access to the points system. The cost to join is currently known, the ability to join and the cost to join in the future is unknown. They may even offer better incentives to join in the future.
 

camachinist

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
2,889
Reaction score
2
Location
Central California
Wasn't there something about Holding Account, points for cancelled/amended reservations being put into a Holding Account, with restrictions for re-booking those points? Not sure but I think I remember something ...
I found this when perusing the 'Inventory Release Calendar' at MVCI:

60-Day Window
Vacation Club Points in a Holding Account may only be
used for vacations booked within 60 days of check-in

I also found this, likely covered elsewhere:

10-Month Window
Owner | One night or more
Owner with Premier status | One night or more
Owner with Premier Plus status | One night or more

Both had dates to attempt reservations, based on desired day of occupancy. The Holding Account day moved with the check-in day, 60 days out.

Ugh...
 

RedDogSD

TUG Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
823
Reaction score
0
Location
Southern California
Currently you pay $89 for II and $109 to trade to another resort.

I think we have to stop comparing the $89 part of the II fee. That $89 lets you look at inventory and go into the system. Supposedly, the new system forces you to let Marriott control everything. So, I think that many TUGGERS and experienced TS'ers will want to pay the $89 and keep the ability to look at Inventory. Who wants to give that up?
 

wuv pooh

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
530
Reaction score
148
Location
NOVA
I think we have to stop comparing the $89 part of the II fee. That $89 lets you look at inventory and go into the system. Supposedly, the new system forces you to let Marriott control everything. So, I think that many TUGGERS and experienced TS'ers will want to pay the $89 and keep the ability to look at Inventory. Who wants to give that up?

It looks like you will still be able to look at the inventory.

Fee: $139* to request travel within your country of residence; $154* to request travel outside your country of residence. *Please note: This is the fee if exchange is placed via IntervalWorld.com. Please note that Owners who place their exchange requests via a telephone call to Interval International will be charged an additional $10. Fees are listed in U.S. dollars, are subject to change, and vary by country of residence.

In fact Enrolled owner now have to pay an extra fee if they use a human at II. I guess this is a way to cut II costs because they are no longer getting the Marriott exchange fees for enrolled owners. Weeks owners do not pay this fee.

Also

Please consult IntervalWorld.com or your current Interval International Directory for answers to all your exchange questions. You can also use IntervalWorld.com to check exchange availability at any of the resorts in the network.

Maybe Marriott will force you to use a vacation advisor, but I would guess not. Why would they want the extra cost if you do not want the support? They control the inventory by deciding what gets deposited not by restricting deposits that are already made. If it is important to you I would definitely ask before enrolling. It would defeat one of the best benefits if you keep two II accounts.
 

CapriciousC

TUG Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
389
Reaction score
0
Location
Savannah, GA
Currently you pay $89 for II and $109 to trade to another resort. That is higher than the new fee. You are correct that if you occupy only then you will save $76 per year and not pay the enrollment fee. The enrollment fee is partially offset by 800 points, so that will reduce some of the cost. If you do not enroll then you will not have access to the new points currency. No one currently knows whether this access will be valuable or not. Next year they could devalue your points or they could add a flexchange option giving weeks for 500 or 1,000 points that could be very valuable.

For most, it will be better to enroll because they will have hard savings from their current fees and future options in the new program that Marriott is pushing. For example I will save over $200 per year by paying one fee so my payback will be very quick.

Since your usage does not provide a fee payback then you only have to decide if you want to pay to keep access to the points system. The cost to join is currently known, the ability to join and the cost to join in the future is unknown. They may even offer better incentives to join in the future.

Actually, we pay our II membership five years at a time, so it averages out to $71.20 a year. We exchange on average two of every three years. So the years we exchange it would cost us $15 more, but in the year we don't, it's saving us $93.80. So for every three years, we're coming out $63.80 ahead by not joining, and that's not counting the enrollment fee.

I agree that the program will be to the benefit of some people. Whether it will benefit most people is an open question. Perhaps it will, because it seems as though the most "popular" resorts are resorts which we have no interest in visiting, so we're obviously already in the minority. (Not that there's anything wrong with any of those resorts, it's just a function of our particular circumstances. We live half an hour from Hilton Head Island - if we want to go up there, we make a day trip and come home and sleep in our own beds. We have family in Newport Beach upon whom we can inflict our company if we want to visit there. Kauai is our favorite island, and my husband doesn't particularly care for Maui, so we probably won't go there, etc.).

I'm not all that worked up about the program one way or the other. We're not going to join, but that's just us. I honestly hope it works out to the benefit of everyone who does join. And on a completely selfish note, if it makes it easier for me to exchange into one of the Spanish resorts or Phuket because everyone else is more interested in US resorts, then I'm all for it.
 

jjluhman

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
403
Reaction score
27
Location
Annapolis, Maryland
It looks like you will still be able to look at the inventory.

Fee: $139* to request travel within your country of residence; $154* to request travel outside your country of residence. *Please note: This is the fee if exchange is placed via IntervalWorld.com. Please note that Owners who place their exchange requests via a telephone call to Interval International will be charged an additional $10. Fees are listed in U.S. dollars, are subject to change, and vary by country of residence.

In fact Enrolled owner now have to pay an extra fee if they use a human at II. I guess this is a way to cut II costs because they are no longer getting the Marriott exchange fees for enrolled owners. Weeks owners do not pay this fee.

Also

Please consult IntervalWorld.com or your current Interval International Directory for answers to all your exchange questions. You can also use IntervalWorld.com to check exchange availability at any of the resorts in the network.

Maybe Marriott will force you to use a vacation advisor, but I would guess not. Why would they want the extra cost if you do not want the support? They control the inventory by deciding what gets deposited not by restricting deposits that are already made. If it is important to you I would definitely ask before enrolling. It would defeat one of the best benefits if you keep two II accounts.

I have asked this question 4 times in different online chat sessions. This particular issue is a deal breaker for me. I may experience a little bit of savings in the long run moving to the new program, but I will not if I still have to pay to have my own interval account. I am not willing to give up that access.

I had two online chats today and they both told me that I would no longer deal directly with Interval because my vacation advisor would take care of all of that for me. They stated this as if it was a huge burden being lifted. When I responded that I really wanted to maintain that access I was told that I could still maintain my own account at my cost.

I really wish I could get a straight answer on this. I have asked for written documentation and not one person has been able to produce it!:shrug:

It looks like I may just have to wait for Tuggers to post their experiences after they enroll. Again money well spent on TUG!
 

wuv pooh

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
530
Reaction score
148
Location
NOVA
Can you imagine

Can you imagine being a Premier Plus points member on July 26th, 2010? According to the rules you will have at least 13,500 points and be able to reserve any room, in any US Marriott, for any day, for any number of days, for 13 months which puts you through the entire summer of 2011 as long as there is inventory available :whoopie:

You will essentially have access to the entire system to yourself for a month. That would be cool. It almost makes me wish that I sold my house when it was $200k higher and bought more Marriott weeks :eek: I have serious points envy :hysterical:
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
50,461
Reaction score
21,915
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
Future Conversation

Imagine this future call to owner services. Man calls in to try to do a Marriott to Marriott exchange.

VOA: Hello, this is <NAME> your Marriott Vacation Club Destinations Vacation Adviser.
Man: Yes, I would like to exchange my gold Marriott week through II for a summer HHI week.
VOA: Sure I can help you with that.
Man: I would like to deposit my week for and place a request for the HHI week.
VOA: We can do that sir. You do understand that you are using a low week to try and get a high demand week.
Man: Yes, I do.
VOA: [Checking II system]. I don't see that I can confirm that week at the moment. If you are willing to convert your current years weeks to points and borrow next years weeks, I can confirm you instantly.
Man: What do you mean? I thought if a week was available I could get it?
VOA: The destinations exchange system currently has control of two HHI summer weeks for when you want to go.
Man: Okay, I will exchange in to them, week for week.
VOA: I can't do that sir. The weeks we have are only available to points people.
Man: I don't get it! I thought if a week was available I could exchange in to it????
VOA: Yes you can, if you are willing to use two years worth of points.
Man: I don't want to do that!!!
VOA: Okay, we will place a request with II to attempt to exchange.
Man: I thought I wouldn't have to deal with II anymore, I always hated dealing with them. I didn't like having to wait!
VOA: You don't have to deal with them sir. I can confirm the week right now if you book with this years points and borrow next years points.
Man: Never mind!
Man: [Hangs up]. I hate this new system.

People don't like II because it is currently the only viable option they really think they have. When Marriott becomes that option, they will complain about the new program just as much.

Just because you sign up doesn't mean you will easily get week for week exchanges. Your VOA will try to push you in to points as much as possible. I am sure they will be commissioned to do so. Doing so gives Marriott control of that week, which is what they want.

Marriott didn't develop all these fancy new point charts just for you to try and do Marriott to Marriott exchanges in II. They will want to push you to points exchanges.
 
Last edited:

m61376

Tug Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
7,241
Reaction score
294
Location
NY
Resorts Owned
Marriott Aruba Surf Club 2 & 3BRs
According to this link (log-in required), you do not lose direct access to II if you enroll and then decide to deposit your week as in the past. The link explains exchanges for those who enroll but choose to reserve their own week and use it for exchanging. One quote:The language at that link is similar to - but not identical to - the comparable link for weeks owners (those who don't enroll in the new program).

Dave-
I did see that- but if refers to making your reservations online and placing a request online- not looking at II's online inventory. I did the online chat thing three times today- one out of the three confirmed that you would have on-line access to II as you do now, or could use a vacation adviser. The others told me only through a vacation adviser- so who do I believe?:wall: :wall:
 

DanCali

TUG Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
4,625
Reaction score
1,928
Resorts Owned
Vistana, Marriott, DVC
Dan, the way it stands now NO weeks that are sold on the external market and closed after 6/20/10 will be eligible to enroll in the Points program. It doesn't matter if existing Weeks owners now enroll or not - the Enrolled Points ownership will not transfer upon resale to a new owner, and all new owners will not be eligible to enroll.

You and I went back and forth in the speculation thread quite a bit about this - I'm not surprised at all that Marriott continued their history of not protecting resale values but I am a little bit surprised that they found a way to impact resale values as much as they have. (I do wonder if it's an attempt to make it easier for them in the future to pick up existing devalued weeks on the resale market through ROFR, to add Points inventory at a favorable cost to them. Probably.)

Yes, that's my understanding. The Enrolled Points membership is an addendum to a deeded week contract that will not transfer upon resale, and this is from the FAQ for the Enrolled Points option (bolding mine):


I was told my a Marriott rep that if you join and sell your week later, the new owner can join for a fee. If you don't join, then the new owner will not be able to join. So basically, a points week sold can get back into points. A weeks week sold cannot. Hopefully we can clarify this soon since, if it is true, it would be a serious issue in considering to join. I'd be more likely to pay the $2K if I thought the resale value of a points week would be higher than a weeks week (which is likely under the scenario I described).

Again, I'm not saing the points transfer on a resale - I am saying the ability to convert to points (for a fee) transfers on a resale if the week was enrolled in points.

I got this info as part of a sales pitch on the phone so take it for what it's worth...
 
Last edited:

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
50,461
Reaction score
21,915
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
Proven Skim?

I haven't seen anyone who looked at "skim" across an entire resort calendar yet. So I took a look at Waiohai Beach Club. Limited seasons, and no different views in weeks made it one of the easiest.

Week|Points Given| OV| IS
1 4225 5025 4225
2 4225 5025 4225
3 4225 5025 4225
4 4225 5875 4850
5 4225 5875 4850
6 4225 5875 4850
7 4225 6175 5075
8 4225 5875 4850
9 4225 5875 4850
10 4225 5875 4850
11 4225 5875 4850
12 4225 5875 4850
13 4225 5025 4225
14 4225 5025 4225
15 4225 5025 4225
16 4225 6175 5075
17 4225 5025 4225
18 4225 5025 4225
19 4225 5025 4225
20 4225 5025 4225
21 4225 5025 4225
22 4225 5875 4850
23 4225 5875 4850
24 4225 5875 4850
25 4225 5875 4850
26 4225 5875 4850
27 4225 5875 4850
28 4225 5875 4850
29 4225 5875 4850
30 4225 5875 4850
31 4225 5875 4850
32 4225 5875 4850
33 4225 5875 4850
34 4225 5025 4225
35 4225 5025 4225
36 4225 5025 4225
37 4225 5025 4225
38 4225 5025 4225
39 4225 5025 4225
40 4225 5025 4225
41 4225 5025 4225
42 4225 5025 4225
43 4225 5025 4225
44 4225 5025 4225
45 4225 5025 4225
46 4225 5025 4225
47 4225 6175 5075
48 4225 5025 4225
49 4225 5025 4225
50 4225 5025 4225
51 4225 6175 5075
52 5175 6850 5550
53
Total 220650 284725 236925

"Skim" OV: 64075 IS: 16275

So Marriott gets approximately 3 extra weeks out of each unit. That is if there were no ocean view in the new system. There is ocean view. I don't know the exact number of units in each view in the new system, so an exact count isn't available. But it only gets worse when you look at two views in the new system.

Edit: There is a week 53. Though only one for 2011, so that would account for another third of a week of points.
 
Last edited:

hotcoffee

TUG Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
1,014
Reaction score
0
Location
Hanover, MD
The only thing I have a little bit of difficulty accepting completely from you is your newfound outrage over resale devaluation. EVERY external resale purchaser was aware of the fact that Marriott does not protect, is not legally bound to protect, resale values. It is the reason why resales are favored over developer purchasers 99.9999999999 times out of 100 - the cost savings are said to be too good to pass up. So if by buying on the external resale market you've acknowledged in some fashion that devaluation is inherent in Marriott timeshares, how can you now cry "Foul!" when you see that it can affect you as a seller, too? The bad comes with the good, and it doesn't matter whether Marriott cooks up a new scheme to deliberately sabotage resale value or whether it happens naturally - as long as Marriott doesn't do something illegal to cause it, then we have to live with it.

Of course, I assume that you realize the resale issue hurts developer owners also. The new system levels the playing field between resale owners and developer owners. We pay more to join, but as I understand it get the same advantages as well as the same disadvantages. I have been told that anyone buying a unit resale under the new program will not be able to join the new program. So, that fact will most likely make it harder to all of us to sell should we ever need to (unless Marriott implements their own resale program).
 

edge4414

newbie
Joined
Mar 1, 2010
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston
I can only go by what our sales rep told us prior to our purchase and since. She has never misrepresented the product to us. The contracts that we received upon purchase and could review during the rescission process supported her statements. Nothing Marriott has done since our purchase has been in violation of the contracts. We specifically asked if changes could be made to our ownership and the answer was, "yes, if the contracts allow for Marriott to make them." We were specifically told that exchanging would probably NOT result in a like-for-like trade because 3BR inventory is that much more limited.

Other people's experiences have been different, I'm well aware of that from all of the posts on TUG where folks are made confused by the misrepresentations made by their sales reps. If I was in their shoes, I would feel the same way they do - that Marriott sold them a product promising one thing and delivering another. I can understand their point of view, but I do not share it!

If the product hasn't been misrepresented to me and I do not feel like others do that Marriott has reneged on their promises, why do you keep insisting that I should feel differently? Everyone's experiences with Marriott are not the same, it stands to reason that everyone's feelings about Marriott will not be the same. It's apparent that I'm in the minority, at least here on TUG, but I'm not alone.

As far as whether to enroll or not in this new thing, we've made the decision to enroll based on the appearance that we will be able to make better use of our timeshares in the new system. There are some fantastic features that I was hoping would be included. And some not so fantastic, granted. I don't like everything about it but I'm satisfied we can make it work. Like everyone else, we will learn as much as possible about it in order to maximize our investment in a "vacation lifestyle." That's all any of us can do.

I guess if it makes you feel better, Tombo, I can apologize to you. I'm sorry that I do not feel insulted by Marriott for things that other MVCI owners may have experienced. I'm sorry that I do not agree with your perception, although I am able to understand it and do appreciate that you've taken so much time to try to explain it clearly for me. And I'm being sincere here, because I know that it's difficult to have to repeatedly justify your position on TUG.

The only thing I have a little bit of difficulty accepting completely from you is your newfound outrage over resale devaluation. EVERY external resale purchaser was aware of the fact that Marriott does not protect, is not legally bound to protect, resale values. It is the reason why resales are favored over developer purchasers 99.9999999999 times out of 100 - the cost savings are said to be too good to pass up. So if by buying on the external resale market you've acknowledged in some fashion that devaluation is inherent in Marriott timeshares, how can you now cry "Foul!" when you see that it can affect you as a seller, too? The bad comes with the good, and it doesn't matter whether Marriott cooks up a new scheme to deliberately sabotage resale value or whether it happens naturally - as long as Marriott doesn't do something illegal to cause it, then we have to live with it.

Sue

You are obviously an intelligent person but your business acumen is lacking. All well run business try to protect their client interests if only for future potential sales. What business do you know that has a resale-able product doesn't tout resale value vs the the competition. I doubt very much your timeshare presentations did not discuss the advantages of a "Marriott Timeshare" i.e.; increasing value, Rewards points, deeded property (in most cases) and the ability to sell - the resale value. It was very obvious to me and stated to me numerous times that ROFR was the tool Marriott would use to insure values would stay high and you know that is exactly what they did until now! Your incessant defense of almost everything Marriott does makes me wonder what your motives are. I can understand some people wanting to join this points program because it fits their individual needs or wants or as some have described fear from what Marriott might do in the future. Whatever anyones reason to join or not join is fine but to try to tell people that Marriott is not breaking commitments to owners is utterly ridiculous. Verbal commits from their sales staff are legally binding and certainly there are thousands of us who were sold the whole program including the property would be ours and ours to run as we so choose. Marriott taking voting rights away and now voting in our annual meetings against owner rights may or may not be legal but it is morally wrong. That is unless you were the only one that was also told Marriott would vote our rights and not us.
 

puckmanfl

TUG Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
2,062
Reaction score
1
good evening...

.....as long as there is inventory available!!!! Ay, there's the rub. On the July 26th the only inventory will be unsold developer inventory placed in points, units returned for MR points and units turned in for points by new enrollee's looking to get a jump on the system....

don't think many ski weeks will be sitting there,but I bet there will be a ton of Lakeshore in May, Marco in October. Plenty of nice opportunites but not the motherload.

I do believe there will be some opportunites for the prime weeks for the real early birds as MVCD has to get the word out early that "points rule" and "weeks drool".

I hope there is plenty of stuff, as I will be one of those 13K folks IF I enroll...
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
50,461
Reaction score
21,915
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
good evening...

.....as long as there is inventory available!!!! Ay, there's the rub. On the July 26th the only inventory will be unsold developer inventory placed in points, units returned for MR points and units turned in for points by new enrollee's looking to get a jump on the system....

don't think many ski weeks will be sitting there,but I bet there will be a ton of Lakeshore in May, Marco in October. Plenty of nice opportunites but not the motherload.

I do believe there will be some opportunites for the prime weeks for the real early birds as MVCD has to get the word out early that "points rule" and "weeks drool".

I hope there is plenty of stuff, as I will be one of those 13K folks IF I enroll...

I wonder though how many weeks Marriott is taking back from II in exchange for several off season weeks. This could be happening now without us even knowing it. Does Marriott need to have a current request to pull weeks back? Or can it pull weeks back based on anticipated demand?
 

wuv pooh

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
530
Reaction score
148
Location
NOVA
I was told my a Marriott rep that if you join and sell your week later, the new owner can join for a fee. If you don't join, then the new owner will not be able to join. So basically, a points week sold can get back into points. A weeks week sold cannot. Hopefully we can clarify this soon since, if it is true, it would be a serious issue in considering to join. I'd be more likely to pay the $2K if I thought the resale value of a points week would be higher than a weeks week (which is likely under the scenario I described).

Again, I'm not saing the points transfer on a resale - I am saying the ability to convert to points (for a fee) transfers on a resale if the week was enrolled in points.

I got this info as part of a sales pitch on the phone so take it for what it's worth...


Dan, the disclosure document says this on page 4 for Trust members:

Trust Members. Upon the sale of an Interest, Exchange Company may require the payment of an initiation fee. (The current initiation fee is $200 per Interest with a $2,000 minimum initiation fee; however, Exchange Company reserves the right to adjust the amount of the initiation fee from time to time and to waive the initiation fee on a case-by-case basis in Exchange Company’s sole and absolute discretion.) Until payment of any required initiation fee is received (or waived by Exchange Company), the owner of such Interest(s) will not be entitled to Base Plus Exchange Benefits or Exchange Benefits; however, payment of the initiation fee will allow access to the Base Plus Exchange Benefits. If the purchase of an Interest is not made from an Approved Broker, then the owner of such Interest(s) may not be entitled to Exchange Benefits in Exchange Company’s sole and absolute discretion, even if the initiation fee is paid. Additional payments may be required to access the Exchange Benefits.

From Page 14 of the exchange doc:

Effect of Transfer of Member’s Interest. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties to a sale, assignment, or transfer, if a Member (“Selling Member”) sells, assigns, or transfers the Selling Member’s Interest to another party (“New Member”), the Selling Member will lose any and all rights to utilize the Exchange Points associated with such Interest to reserve the use of a Use Period or to use any previously-reserved Use Period. Each New Member will be required to remit to the Association an initiation fee; provided, however, an initiation fee shall not be required to be paid by an existing Member. (The current initiation fee is $200 per Interest with a $2,000 minimum initiation fee; however, Exchange Company reserves the right to adjust the amount of the initiation fee from time to time and to waive the initiation fee on a case-by-case basis in Exchange Company’s sole and absolute discretion.) Exchange Company will, within ten (10) business days of receipt from a New Member of the initiation fee, if required, and a certified copy of the recorded deed transferring an Interest to the New Member, change Exchange Company’s official records to reflect such transfer of an Interest from a Selling Member to a New Member. Further, with respect to Trust Members, until payment of any required initiation fee is received (or waived by Exchange Company), the New Member may not be entitled to Base Plus Exchange Benefits or Special Benefits in Exchange Company’s sole and absolute discretion; however, payment of the initiation fee (or waiver by Exchange Company) will allow access to the Base Plus Exchange Benefits. With respect to Exchange Members, until payment of the enrollment fee, the New Member will not be entitled to participate in the Program. If the purchase of an Interest is not made from an Approved Broker, then the owner of such Interest(s) may not be entitled to Special Benefits in Exchange Company’s sole and absolute discretion, even if the initiation fee is paid.

It seems like if you do not use an approved broker you may be out of luck even if you do pay $2,000. Without having a full base interest or paying the initiation fee you are limited to reservations within 60 days, which is a big disadvantage. They seem to also want to control who brokers their exchange points.

“Approved Broker” which includes: (a) the developer of the Member’s Affiliate Program or Component; or (b) such other entity approved by Exchange Company, from time to time; (ii) acquire the Interest by virtue of being a Family Member by gift, will, divorce decree, testamentary disposition, intestate succession or trust from a Member; or (iii) is otherwise granted Membership by Exchange Company, upon the terms and conditions then determined by Exchange Company in Exchange Company’s sole and absolute discretion. If a Member does not purchase the Member’s Interest from an Approved Broker, such Member may be limited to only Base Exchange Benefits, or upon payment of the initiation fee, if permitted in Exchange Company’s sole and absolute discretion, Base Plus Exchange Benefits.

I think you have some more work to do to understand the implications. It is not very clear to me what all this means except that it gives Marriott all the cards in the deck :(
 

puckmanfl

TUG Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
2,062
Reaction score
1
good evening...

the 64K question!!!!

What is the relationship between MVCD and II? Is it independent or proprietary? Does II have a fiduciary (huge word) responsibility to its members to provide fair exchanges to members or deal with their potentially biggest customers (MVCD) first?

who knows??

perhaps the legal eagles out there can take a crack at this one!!!

This could be the whole KEY for MVCD. If they can do this they will have good inventory in the "point" bucket
 

timeos2

Tug Review Crew: Rookie
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
11,183
Reaction score
5
Location
Rochester, NY
It can be done - will they let you do it?

It looks like you will still be able to look at the inventory.
.

Of course I can't be sure how Marriott will do it but at least with the DRI II account - also corporate one that is limited to use with DRI deposits - does allow you to log in & view II inventory and specials. Now they also let you reserve II exchanges on line & I guess Marriott won't allow that so maybe the whole set up is different. But at least we know II does allow corporate account individual members to use the on line system.
 

Dean

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
4,047
This statement is exactly why people are upset. If true then Marriott has screwed all it's loyal owners.
From an exchange standpoint I think we've known that Marriott will tilt the table from the first day this came up. It will likely happen slowly but in 3-5 years it's likely that high season Marriott weeks will be almost exclusively available through the new program if looking at exchanges.

My hat is off to you. If you can make the new system work to your advantage, that is fantastic. Don't forget to factor in the points skimmed into your spreadsheet, and if you do that and it still works that is great..

I will cut my nose off to spite my face if I feel wronged. If I lose access to inventory and if my week become worthless, I will let that happen before i pay them a dollar of extortion. They will not profit on me after devaluing what I own, forcing me to buy points to continue to make like for like trades, charge me $1995 to convert to points, then charge anyone I sell my week to at least that much to retain what I already paid for. Jst because they can hurt my value and my access to inventory doesn't mean that I will pay them money because they have me over a barrel. They might make billions on the points program, but it won't be from any money I paid them.
I am confident that I can make it work to my advantage as well. I'm still gathering information to be sure I have all the details I need but I expect this change to save me several hundred dollars a year AND give me access to inventory that I don't have good access to now, at least with what I'd use to try to trade. I'm very happy to pay modestly higher points for certain guarantees and direct booking options. The truth is that with my situation, I plan to play both sides of the street.

I do want to caution some that might have bought units to use AND others to trade. Just remember that IF you bought a trading unit to take advantage of the 13 month reservation option, consider this in your decision making process. In my case it likely won't matter but it would have a year ago before I bought 2 additional trading type units.

I just have a difficult time pairing principles with timeshares as it's always been essentially one owner vs another for all but fixed week/fixed unit systems. If principles were the key no way to belong to Marriott in the previous system due to the 13 months option, no way to belong to Bluegreen or Wyndham due to the VIP systems, etc. I'd equate it more to "honor among thieves" than anything else.

Did DVC keep the cost of a total week the same, and just redistribute the daily points? If so, that sounds reasonable.
Yes, they have a rule that in effect keeps the points the same for the entire year for the resort overall. However, they do charge MORE for a studio or 1 BR than they do the combined 2 BR unit and this is NOT protected in the yearly points requirement.

No way. I bought this when this was being spread on the board a few days ago, and I finally realized that this is wrong. Marriott cannot create new demand out of thin air. They are not going to have 1 million new points owners overnight AND the point owners that they get are going to try for a lot less prime weeks because they could not afford the 7000 points for a prime week in Maui. So, unlike in the past where every Marriott week owner would try to get the top weeks, now....many of them will try for less exciting weeks because they want to stretch their points.

So, what will Marriott do with the rest of their prime inventory? They will try to rent it. Yeah....and? They have always been trying to rent their prime inventory. They charge too much. THey have to. It would take away from their brand name if they did not charge 3x as much for a 2 bedroom Villa as opposed to a Hotel Room. So, they can try renting until they are blue in the face. They will not get that many takers at those prices.

So, now what? Marriott has exhausted rentals and their points owners, and they still have lots of inventory. Where will it go? The only place that Marriott can drop it where they do not get egg on their face (by renting it cheap) is Interval. So, Interval weeks will still get plenty of inventory for the forseeable future.
IMO the answer is somewhere in between. Currently there is quite a bit of mismatched inventory. Basically those with lower demand deposits searching for higher demand, larger units, etc. In many cases these are NOT being matched to Marriott owners or at least not the ones that have been looking for some time. Plus some that own Marriott don't belong to II and trade that way but rather through independents and privately. Thus it is my belief that there is a significant amount of inventory that is not currently matched to Marriott exchangers in a timeshare manner now that WILL match to those or similar owners in the future. I'd estimate that the % of deposits available to weeks Marriott exchangers in 1-2 years is reduced about 1.5 times the reduction in available inventory. Remember that the number looking will go down as well. Here's a numerical representation of the thinking. Say that now there were 100 owners looking in II for Marriott weeks and 150 units available during the time they were looking. I'd estimate that about half (75) of those never match to Marriott exchangers partly because many are low demand weeks and partly because of trade power issues. Now with the new system only about 50 (in this example) Marriott members are now looking in weeks to exchange but there are now likely only 50 units and many of those will be low and shoulder season. The rest will be looking with points. It may actually be worse than this as Marriott will be searching II as well to take back the weeks they need to fulfill their requests.
 
Top