• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 30 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 30th anniversary: Happy 30th Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $21,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $21 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    60,000+ subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Arriving Guest Information [merged]

Fasttr

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
6,260
Reaction score
3,401
Points
498
Location
Connecticut
Resorts Owned
Marriott's Grande Ocean (Enrolled)
MVC Trust Points
Has anything changed for adding guest names to reservation when you are making a points reservations? I typically add the names when I make the initial reservation.
I believe that process will be unchanged. When doing so, the additional guest names also show on the Marriott confirm email you receive, so should be no problem if one of your guests arrive before you do (although if that is to occur, I usually reach out to the resort directly to let them know).

I believe the new form is targeted towards adding guests, and/or changing who's name the ressy is in, after the initial confirmation has been sent.
 

igopogo

TUG Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2022
Messages
288
Reaction score
146
Points
103
I believe that process will be unchanged. When doing so, the additional guest names also show on the Marriott confirm email you receive, so should be no problem if one of your guests arrive before you do (although if that is to occur, I usually reach out to the resort directly to let them know).

I believe the new form is targeted towards adding guests, and/or changing who's name the ressy is in, after the initial confirmation has been sent.
If this remains possible, it suggests that the new policy is tightly aimed at those who make speculative bookings for future rentals. That would make sense, as I think this is where the points transfer abuse was taking place. I hope that’s true.
 

Fasttr

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
6,260
Reaction score
3,401
Points
498
Location
Connecticut
Resorts Owned
Marriott's Grande Ocean (Enrolled)
MVC Trust Points
If this remains possible, it suggests that the new policy is tightly aimed at those who make speculative bookings for future rentals. That would make sense, as I think this is where the points transfer abuse was taking place. I hope that’s true.
I concur.
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
47,369
Reaction score
18,931
Points
1,299
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
Has anything changed for adding guest names to reservation when you are making a points reservations? I typically add the names when I make the initial reservation.
When making a reservation with points, do you have to provide as much information as the new form is requesting?
 

Fasttr

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
6,260
Reaction score
3,401
Points
498
Location
Connecticut
Resorts Owned
Marriott's Grande Ocean (Enrolled)
MVC Trust Points
When making a reservation with points, do you have to provide as much information as the new form is requesting?
Nope....just name for additional guests.
 

WahooWah

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
120
Reaction score
55
Points
188
This is nonsense. It is almost 48 hours since I filled out the form and no confirmation email yet from Marriott. This should be a slam dunk class action lawsuit if they intend to radically move the goalposts like this.
 

Superchief

TUG Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
3,945
Reaction score
2,843
Points
448
Location
Cincinnati, OH
When making a reservation with points, do you have to provide as much information as the new form is requesting?
Previously, I could just add the names as I was completing my reservation process. I haven't done this for a few months, but I hope this process doesn't change.
 

WahooWah

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
120
Reaction score
55
Points
188
Yes, you wouldn't use this form. You would just add guests to the room at checkin.
Did you get confirmation of the guest change after filling out the form last Wednesday? How long did it take?
 

alexb

TUG Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
566
Reaction score
77
Points
388
Location
united kindom
Resorts Owned
Craigendarroch Scotland,Marriott Grande Chateau,pga golf village
I filled in form yesterday guest got confirmation yesterday but I have not received any confirmation.
 

DanCali

TUG Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
4,492
Reaction score
1,790
Points
398
Resorts Owned
Vistana, Marriott, DVC
I filled in form yesterday guest got confirmation yesterday but I have not received any confirmation.

You will not get a confirmation because they likely removed your Bonvoy number from the confirmation and set the guest's email as the default email for confirmations.

In such a case, your "confirmation" is seeking the week drop out of your "My Trips" page on marriott.com
 

jmhpsu93

TUG Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2018
Messages
1,764
Reaction score
1,147
Points
274
Location
Maryland, USA
Resorts Owned
MVC Abound Points
MVC Grande Vista (x2)
MVC Cypress Harbour (x2)
MVC Harbour Lake (x2)
Golden Shores (Mexico)
Funny that's it's easier to change guest info and Bonvoy number on an Interval trade than a MVC reservation. :shrug:
 

WahooWah

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
120
Reaction score
55
Points
188
I filled out the guest change form on Sunday. I had received no confirmation of the change earlier today so I called a VOA. They confirmed that the reservation was in the guest's name and attached to the guest's email and that I should not have received a confirmation. I asked the VOA to send me one. I then reached out to the guest and they said they had not received confirmation (checked their spam folder and everything). I had to then forward to the guest the confirmation email that the VOA forwarded to me. How ridiculous.
 

Fasttr

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
6,260
Reaction score
3,401
Points
498
Location
Connecticut
Resorts Owned
Marriott's Grande Ocean (Enrolled)
MVC Trust Points
I filled out the guest change form on Sunday. I had received no confirmation of the change earlier today so I called a VOA. They confirmed that the reservation was in the guest's name and attached to the guest's email and that I should not have received a confirmation. I asked the VOA to send me one. I then reached out to the guest and they said they had not received confirmation (checked their spam folder and everything). I had to then forward to the guest the confirmation email that the VOA forwarded to me. How ridiculous.
Sounds like its working to "MVC-Perfection". (insert eye roll emoji here!!)
 

igopogo

TUG Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2022
Messages
288
Reaction score
146
Points
103
There is now a link to the form on the reservation summary (from manage points reservations). "Change arriving guest information."
 

RENTER

Guest
Joined
Aug 17, 2021
Messages
268
Reaction score
77
Points
38
Marriott needs to accept responsibility for creating the big time rental monster and need to come up with a better way to DEFINE commercial and phase into a level of tolerance in the entire system, points and weeks. It needs to be both points and weeks because MVC modified the program to be flexible and it should be fully flexible.

There is HISTORY of sales department TOUTING RENTING. There is also history for “how to use your ownership” as PRECEDENCE to show MVC ENCOURAGED, FACILITATED and TOLERATED rentals.

When we bought in ‘99 Marriott gave the option to rent through them. As I remember it, Ocean Pointe it was a 65/35 split but at Aruba Ocean Club it was 40/60. Then after points were initiated MVC no longer wanted to facilitate this option and limited the weeks they would accept. Since renting wasn’t prohibited but was no longer facilitated by MVC owners found other options and the big rental monster was born.

I say it wasn’t prohibited because OS reps we’re understanding when you called to change names on the ressie. They would even ask if you were staying or asked if you were renting and remove your personal Bonvoy information. The PRECEDENCE was MVC was ACCOMODATING!

HISTORY, FACILITATION, ACCOMMODATION, PRECEDENCE, TOLERANCE, SELLING THE OPTION.

MVC needs to ACCEPT responsibility for the big rental problem, define commercial and make allowances for what they promised as part of the program they sold.

It’s the Marriott Way.
I just had a heated argument with a Mariott salesperson over this issue. She wanted me to buy more points and when I said I do not need more points she said you can rent them out. I told her it was BS because I just went thru this with Wyndham where they changed the rules on renting. Renting was ok as long as you paid Wyndham 40% and Mariott 35%. But once owners figured out they can rent themselves on online rental sites, they started to lose business and started to change the rules. Wyndham owners started to fight back and pointed out the hypocrisy that you an rent thru them but cannot rent on your own. Also owners fought back about the definition of commercial and pointed out the courts and the IRS do not consider individuals renting a commercial business. They pointed out that homeowner associations usually win their cases against homeowners except in the case where they declare a homeowner renting their home a commercial business. Then they always lose. They also told Wyndham they are crazy if they think people can afford these points if they do not rent. The owners do not know if it is a trap or they made their point, but Wyndham since the fall has partnered with these short-term rental sites and are allowing owners to rent on them as long as they have the right of approval on the wording of the rental posting. The wording they wanted included, many owners already had in their posting. She brought in her supervisor who told me rules always change. I told him then do not ask me for more money if rules always change.
 

WahooWah

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
120
Reaction score
55
Points
188
I just had a heated argument with a Mariott salesperson over this issue. She wanted me to buy more points and when I said I do not need more points she said you can rent them out. I told her it was BS because I just went thru this with Wyndham where they changed the rules on renting. Renting was ok as long as you paid Wyndham 40% and Mariott 35%. But once owners figured out they can rent themselves on online rental sites, they started to lose business and started to change the rules. Wyndham owners started to fight back and pointed out the hypocrisy that you an rent thru them but cannot rent on your own. Also owners fought back about the definition of commercial and pointed out the courts and the IRS do not consider individuals renting a commercial business. They pointed out that homeowner associations usually win their cases against homeowners except in the case where they declare a homeowner renting their home a commercial business. Then they always lose. They also told Wyndham they are crazy if they think people can afford these points if they do not rent. The owners do not know if it is a trap or they made their point, but Wyndham since the fall has partnered with these short-term rental sites and are allowing owners to rent on them as long as they have the right of approval on the wording of the rental posting. The wording they wanted included, many owners already had in their posting. She brought in her supervisor who told me rules always change. I told him then do not ask me for more money if rules always change.
Does anyone have any links to this saga between Wyndham and Wyndham owners and how it concluded? Also any links to court decisions or proclamations by the IRS about their interpretation of renting as a commercial business?
 

Tride

TUG Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2021
Messages
15
Reaction score
6
Points
63
Resorts Owned
Marriott Destination Points
Marriott Harbour Lake
Marriott Surfwatch
Does anyone have any links to this saga between Wyndham and Wyndham owners and how it concluded? Also any links to court decisions or proclamations by the IRS about their interpretation of renting as a commercial business?
want to get other peoples opinions on this “new” policy for changing guests names on a existing reservation. We are now liable for any damage done by a renter? And what is considered commercial use? Are we not able to rent out our weeks or points anymore?


The Owner/Member identified above hereby submits this Guest Form and provides the following certifications and acknowledgments:

I have obtained consent from the Guest to provide Marriott Vacation Club International and its affiliates (“MVCI”) the required Guest information.

I have advised the Guest of MVCI’s Global Privacy Statement and agree to hold harmless and indemnity MVCI for any claim by the Guest relating to MVCI’s collection and use of the Guest information.

Guest name and contact information provided are accurate and I have advised the Guest that, should MVCI be unable to verify the Guest information prior to arrival, the Guest will not be allowed to check-in.

I have advised the Guest that the Guest must check-in at the front desk of the property with valid identification and a valid credit card.

I am responsible for any damages to the property caused by the Guest and others associated with the Guest.

If I do NOT stay at the property, I will not receive Marriott Bonvoy Elite night credits.

If I do stay at the property, I will not receive Marriott Bonvoy Elite night credits unless I present valid identification and check-in at the front desk.

Commercial use of Accommodations, Base Exchange Benefits, Base Plus Exchange Benefits, Special Benefits or Use Periods, including a pattern of rental activity, is prohibited under the Abound Exchange Procedures and may result in cancellation of reservations. I certify that this reservation is not for any commercial purpose and release Exchange Company and its affiliates from any and all liability relating to or arising from such reservation cancellation.
Please choose one of the follow:

I intend to stay at the property for substantially the full length of the stay according to the confirmation details.

I DO NOT intend to stay at the property for substantially the full length of the stay according to the
 

Dean

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
9,909
Reaction score
3,583
Points
648
I think we've always been liable for our guests though the risks are minimal IMO. They haven't formally published a definition of commercial renting but I think the only ones that would have risk are the ones who are renting a considerable volume repeatedly where most reasonable people would agree that it's commercial. The only issue I have is having to send the info in and hope they get it changed in a reasonable period of time.
 

sponger76

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2022
Messages
1,624
Reaction score
1,076
Points
223
Location
Texas
Does anyone have any links to this saga between Wyndham and Wyndham owners and how it concluded? Also any links to court decisions or proclamations by the IRS about their interpretation of renting as a commercial business?
IRS definition of business activities

See the above link for IRS definition of what constitutes a business.

It starts off with: "A trade or business is generally an activity carried on for a livelihood or in good faith to make a profit." (emphasis mine)

It goes on to list some of the "facts and circumstances used to make this determination," including:
  • regularity of the activities
  • production of income

Based on the above, my personal interpretation is that if every once in a while you happen to be unable to occupy your timeshare so you rent it out to recoup the maintenance fees only (no profit), its not a business. However, if you are doing it consistently (regularity of the activity) and/or for profit (production of income), you are engaged in business activity.
 

Dean

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
9,909
Reaction score
3,583
Points
648
IRS definition of business activities

See the above link for IRS definition of what constitutes a business.

It starts off with: "A trade or business is generally an activity carried on for a livelihood or in good faith to make a profit." (emphasis mine)

It goes on to list some of the "facts and circumstances used to make this determination," including:
  • regularity of the activities
  • production of income

Based on the above, my personal interpretation is that if every once in a while you happen to be unable to occupy your timeshare so you rent it out to recoup the maintenance fees only (no profit), its not a business. However, if you are doing it consistently (regularity of the activity) and/or for profit (production of income), you are engaged in business activity.
IMO this is completely different that the IRS guidelines which are tax based. Since we are allowed to rent but not for Commercial use, profitability per se isn't going to be a component of the equation. From a practical standpoint MVC wouldn't be able to track profits even if they wanted to.
 

sponger76

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2022
Messages
1,624
Reaction score
1,076
Points
223
Location
Texas
IMO this is completely different that the IRS guidelines which are tax based. Since we are allowed to rent but not for Commercial use, profitability per se isn't going to be a component of the equation. From a practical standpoint MVC wouldn't be able to track profits even if they wanted to.
I agree, from MVC or any timeshare company's standpoint, they won't be able to track profitability. I was responding to someone asking if the IRS had an interpretation of renting as a business. While it doesn't specify renting, the page does talk about what the IRS considers to be a business. For me personally, this is a quick litmus test way for an owner considering renting to define whether or not they may be engaged in a commercial business. The part where the timeshare companies could track it is regularity.
 

Tride

TUG Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2021
Messages
15
Reaction score
6
Points
63
Resorts Owned
Marriott Destination Points
Marriott Harbour Lake
Marriott Surfwatch
I think we've always been liable for our guests though the risks are minimal IMO. They haven't formally published a definition of commercial renting but I think the only ones that would have risk are the ones who are renting a considerable volume repeatedly where most reasonable people would agree that it's commercial. The only issue I have is having to send the info in and hope they get it changed in a reasonable period of time.
Do they keep the owners credit card on file to charge for any damages? And why wouldn’t they charge it to the guest who has occupied the unit when they need to provide a credit card when they check in
 

Dean

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
9,909
Reaction score
3,583
Points
648
Do they keep the owners credit card on file to charge for any damages? And why wouldn’t they charge it to the guest who has occupied the unit when they need to provide a credit card when they check in
They wouldn't have to have your CC, they could simply hold your account hostage. While they generally would take a CC from the person checking in, this is something that can be bypassed. Also, for someone low enough to cause a major problem, they can cancel the CC mid stream, I know if this happening. Still very low risk IMO and non't something that would prevent me from renting, but it is among the reasons I wouldn't rent to someone I got a bad vibe from.
 

Dean

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
9,909
Reaction score
3,583
Points
648
I agree, from MVC or any timeshare company's standpoint, they won't be able to track profitability. I was responding to someone asking if the IRS had an interpretation of renting as a business. While it doesn't specify renting, the page does talk about what the IRS considers to be a business. For me personally, this is a quick litmus test way for an owner considering renting to define whether or not they may be engaged in a commercial business. The part where the timeshare companies could track it is regularity.
Maybe I missed the iRS part previously though I still see zero applicability to the issue of commercial timesahare renting and not just because of the difficulty of tracking profits. I suspect you could ask 100 people on TUG for their definition and you'd get 100 different answers ranging from no renting to unlimited. Mine personally would be volume based and possibly a dedicate website. Now if renting were contractually forbidden, like with II, it'd be different. But there certainly are things they can do to make it more difficult and I guess this is one but IMO, it's a weird one that doesn't make a lot of sense in how it's being implemented. Certainly acknowledging the risks, obligations and provide the contact info is reasonable, but 30 days?
 

sponger76

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2022
Messages
1,624
Reaction score
1,076
Points
223
Location
Texas
Maybe I missed the iRS part previously though I still see zero applicability to the issue of commercial timesahare renting and not just because of the difficulty of tracking profits. I suspect you could ask 100 people on TUG for their definition and you'd get 100 different answers ranging from no renting to unlimited. Mine personally would be volume based and possibly a dedicate website. Now if renting were contractually forbidden, like with II, it'd be different. But there certainly are things they can do to make it more difficult and I guess this is one but IMO, it's a weird one that doesn't make a lot of sense in how it's being implemented. Certainly acknowledging the risks, obligations and provide the contact info is reasonable, but 30 days?
I'm not disagreeing with you about how onerous the new process is for changing names on reservations. I was just engaging in the tangential topic of how to define commercial (business) use. We all know that pretty much all the major timeshare players prohibit "commercial" use, but most systems don't outright prohibit all renting. Most TUG users who've been around for a few minutes or more realize that there are as many opinions of what commercial use is as there are TUG members. Again, I was just responding to somebody who specifically asked if there was an IRS definition of renting as a commercial business.
 
Top