Some important clarifications...
So, I did call in to check on this, and got some interesting clarifications:
1. There is an "transition period" that will occur between Aug 3/4 - where all of your current cancelled points will become regular use year points. These points will NOT be associated to a contract... the contract line will be "blank".
2. AFTER August 4th, any reservation you cancel, the points will go back to where they came from to make the reservation, NOT to the use year of the reservation. The examples I was provided included:
A. Reservations made from a credit pool will go back to the same credit pool
B. Reservations made from a contract will go back to that contract and to the same use year of that contract - so if you borrow points to make a reservation in the express window, with the intention of cancelling the reservation and making a different reservation NOT in the express window - you will no longer be able to do this.
3. The 10 unit/20% limit does NOT apply to units listed with Extra Holidays. You could reserve all of Bonnet Creek (if you happened to have several hundred million points) and put all of the reservations with Extra Holidays, and none of the reservations would be cancelled.
4. There will NOT be a block on making the reservation when you reach the Nightly Unit Limit (NUL). What will happen instead is that the reservation will be automatically cancelled. Supposedly the points will go back to where they are supposed to go (unless it's inside the 15-day window, in which case the points will simply be lost.) Which reservation gets cancelled when you book the 11th night? Supposedly, the last one. This is troubling because you may not know that a reservation you're making isn't allowed, and you need to know that because you may have to choose between which reservation you'll want to keep, rather than having the system automatically cancel the last one.
5. Overlaps count, even if only a single night of overlap.
The "waiver" for placing reservations with Extra Holidays seems to reflect an OCI issue (Organizational Conflict of Interest). Wyndham is, in its role as manager/administrator of CWP, advantaging its own subsidiary to the detriment of owners and 3rd party companies. I'll leave it to the attorneys amongst us to weigh in on that aspect.