wsrobinson
TUG Member
After conversion, can you convert the club points to Marriott Hotel Points?
Yes at a conversion rate of 33 to 1.
After conversion, can you convert the club points to Marriott Hotel Points?
I don't get this. You lose nothing by joining except for the fee to join which is offset by points.
You save a bundle at $199 each year vs. current fees
You can quit your annual commitment whenever you want if you hate it.
They ARE giving out ALL the points they are requiring. But they are spread over ALL owners in that season/group. There is no skimming or non-existent points being asked for. To say they aren't assigning as many points to those periods as they are asking for is an absolutely incorrect statement. It makes it sound somehow underhanded or a value grab when that just isn't the case.
You lose money every year in which you take the option to occupy your own resort, trade for MR points (unless you own more than 1 week) or deposit the week with II.
Are you sure that you can leave the system at any time?
I think the points that were allocated where based on purchase price.
NCV: 3475 points (no where near what they want for a summer week - 4700)
Cost PP to join: 9.2?
3475 * 9.2: $31970
A few thosusand short of what a NCV costs....
Does that math work for any other owner?
Again, what is the light? I agree the system sucks, but it is going to be the system going forward. You can join for free/low cost and keep your options open. If you don't join what will happen if II trades dry up? What if Marriott changes the point totals to give people MORE points because they find they made a mistake in the demand? If you opted out will you be able to get back in?
Unless you want to make a statement that Marriott is bad then I don't see the value in closing out your options when no one knows what will happen in the next few years.
My 5750 points for a Plat OS 3BR at SurfWatch gets me during the same weeks of my season a Plat 2BR OS at OceanWatch (good example of a similar area/location newer resort) for anywhere between 3175 and 4725 points depending on which week. The 4725 is the highest-demand July 4th holiday, it's 3175 for the earliest/latest weeks in the season, the remaining weeks in the season require 4175. All of those would give me back points which could be banked for the following year or used in the same year for off-season stays of any number of nights. If I didn't enroll in Points, my 3BR SW deposit wouldn't get me anything more than the 2BR at OceanWatch (which would possibly be a gardenview as an exchanger,) considering that this year the SW week is not eligible for an AC if deposited.
Look Tombo, I posted in another thread that I understand what you mean by "skimming" and I'm not thrilled with it either. But the way I figure, it's offset by the impact that this will have on inventory in the Weeks system.
I also posted throughout those months of speculation that I expected points inflation to occur between resorts, I expected that whatever Marriott did they certainly would not be concerned about resale values and would negatively impact them if they could, I expected that the inventory in II would be negatively impacted at least to the extent that Starwood was able to do so. None of those are a surprise. All of them will exist from this point forward regardless of the system you choose.
What IS a surprise is the relatively low enrollment and annual fees (for direct purchases) even considering that Club Dues will probably increase at the rate of m/f. I LOVE the flexibility of the Points system - it's another thing that I posted repeatedly. I said if it was rolled out as an overlay exchange system offering a marriage of DVC's system with Marriott's resorts then "I'd be over the moon." Well, that's what it's rolled out to be - why wouldn't I be happy? Everything that I like about DVC is here: home resort reservations procedures and m/f (although not for new owners who can only buy Points,) flexibility with more or less than 7 night stays, banking and borrowing, instant reservation confirmations ...
I'm still looking at it, haven't committed yet. There are some contract things that I want to be aware of, and certainly the inconsistencies that seem to be happening with SW's point values need to be fixed. (It isn't that 2- and 3-BR units are supposed to be assigned the same values, btw, it's that the system appears to be incorrectly doing that now. They're aware of the problem and looking into it.) But it simply comes down to, Points might work better for me on a consistent basis than Weeks have in the past or will in the future, especially with the Premier Plus advantage.
What works or doesn't work for you may not be the same for somebody else. I'm not implying that you may not understand things enough to see or not see the advantages/disadvantages in your choice. I sure wish I wasn't reading that implication in your words.
I see this a lot in your posts. You seem like a salesman selling on fear. Is that the best way to buy any product? This whole marketing scheme is like a retail TS purchase, buy now or it will be gone tomorrow. We know how that usually works. Call back on 1/1/2011, the same price and offer is on the table.
Doesn't work where Waiohai fixed 51 week Platinum Plus (obviously purchased at a higher dollar amount from developer) is given the same amount of points as a floating Waiohai Platinum week!!!!! Yes, this is comparing same view to same view.
But the reservation point fee for that 51 week is much higher than any of the float weeks!!
I see this a lot in your posts. You seem like a salesman selling on fear. Is that the best way to buy any product? This whole marketing scheme is like a retail TS purchase, buy now or it will be gone tomorrow. We know how that usually works. Call back on 1/1/2011, the same price and offer is on the table.
No I don't, and neither will the majority
Lower fee for my current usage pattern:
Current - II - $89
lockoff - $75
2 internal trades - $218
Total = $382
System fee = $165
.
The average number obviously cannot be lower than the minimum value of any one week so 4075 isn't a possible assigned value.
Again, what is the light? I agree the system sucks, but it is going to be the system going forward. You can join for free/low cost and keep your options open.(For me $1995 is not free/low cost) If you don't join what will happen if II trades dry up? (trade with another company, trade for non-marriott resorts, use my week) What if Marriott changes the point totals to give people MORE points because they find they made a mistake in the demand? (What if Marriott changes the point totals to give people LESS points because they find they made a mistake in the demand?) If you opted out will you be able to get back in? (If you buy in what happens with your voting rights? (Why spend the yearly fees if you plan to use your week at your resort?)
Unless you want to make a statement that Marriott is bad then I don't see the value in closing out your options when no one knows what will happen in the next few years. (Unless you want to make a statement that Marriott is good then I don't see the value in paying out $1995 to buy something of little value NOW when no one knows what will happen in the next few years.)
Most people have weeks that are weak traders in this system and won't trade them for points even if they join. So, in such case, discard the internal trade cost and you get even if you deposit a lockoff unit but you lose money if your unit does not have the lockoff feature, if you decide to occupy or trade in for MR points. The system is certainly not for most of use but only a minority.
sure works for us, MMC Plat 2375 x 9.2 = 21,850I think the points that were allocated where based on purchase price.
NCV: 3475 points (no where near what they want for a summer week - 4700)
Cost PP to join: 9.2?
3475 * 9.2: $31970
A few thosusand short of what a NCV costs....
Does that math work for any other owner?
See my thoughts in RED above.
Ray
You misunderstand the system. You can enroll, reserve your week, deposit it in II, and make a WEEKS trade at no additional charge for internal Marriott exchanges. Just like today only cheaper if you make one trade.
You still have to pay II if you request non-Marriott weeks. Just like today.
See my thoughts in RED above.
Ray
The 4075 would represent each weeks share of the total pot of points represented by the season/designation of say "Platinum". Within that designation would be a number of weeks - some worth a low of 4125 up to some worth 4650. Based on that the real number assigned to each owner week would actually fall between 4125 and 4650. Probably on the lower end like 4320 as there tend to be more lower value weeks than higher ones in most groupings. The average number obviously cannot be lower than the minimum value of any one week so 4075 isn't a possible assigned value.
Hope that helps.
Yes at a conversion rate of 33 to 1.