I have to question your animosity to the present board and president while, at the same time, you express support for, and satisfaction with, prior boards and officers. The current president may be unresponsive to you missives, but wasn't it prior boards that did not accumulate enough of a reserve for these repairs and the refurbishment?
That isnt the case at all. The prior board president(who is still on the board now...but who knows for how long if Marriott has its way) and the previous board were basing reserves on what info they were provided by Marriott. Do not forget for a second that most of the figures and projections are based on info provided by Marriott people, certainly in the beginnig and to some extent even now. Only in the last couple of years have certain things begun coming to light. A perfect example of this is the 5 year status of the roof when the timeshares were sold by Marriott. The board was only made aware of this in the most recent past. If this was hidden then how could the board have known. Why in heavens name do you think that Marriott is agreeing to pay "a portion" of the refurbishment costs? When many things were questioned by the previous president and he began pushing for answers on behalf of the owners and providing information to the owners Marriott stepped in and tried to quelch things. By many of the recent actions it has become abundantly clear that Marriott and some of the members of the current board do not want owners to have any of this information. IMHO that is simply wrong and promote a great deal of mistrust. I find it quite strange that the most important thing to Marriott and the current board is to keep info from owners. Think of it this way...if you lived in a condo, and your maintenance fees were changing dramatically, but your board refused to discuss why would you not be concerned. To me it is the veil of secrecy that is most disconcerting.
Why would Marriott(and the current president and some members ) not want the owners to have all info? If one is trying to hide something that usually means there is something to hide. If the board and Marriott were operating openly dh and I would likely simply just "deal" . We are fortunately in a position where the increase isnt going to affect us. Many others are not so fortunate.
My concern is with the bigger picture which is quite frankly one of open and honest dealings. From all reports, the new president and board feels they have to account only to Marriott and not the owners. For heavens sake....Marriott is the management company FOR THE OWNERS!!! Mariott is NOT the owner, this is not one of their hotels. It is supposed to be our board. They should be telling it like it is to the owners who they are responsible to, explaining the situation honestly, not hiding, and prepared to deal with whatever flack there is. There's an old adage...if you cant stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
This may or may not be a case for legal action, personally I quite frankly havent formulated my opinion on that just yet, but it isnt that difficult to get enough members involved to call for a meeting and I would suspect that those who are involved in this process are well on there way to so doing...it is perhaps time to change some of the bylaws to prevent this kind of nonsense from ever taking place again(and again by a perusal of the bylaws that also isnt that difficult). It may not have an effect on either the special assesment or the maintenance fees but it very well could have an effect on the way the board is run in the future.