I agree that Hawaii has missed the boat on this and squandered a lot of time to upgrade their health system capacity and contact tracing.
You are also correct that they are by far the state that is in the most precarious position right now in terms of spread. As you point out, the R value is the highest in the US right now.
I’m not so sure I am agreeing with your assessment of California being the best comparison on the R value basis. If anything CA is mediocre at best. The two states with the best R values currently are Alabama and Arizona. Hardly shining beacons of lock-down behaviour. Even Florida isn’t looking too bad on this metric.
I believe the simplest explanation here is that the early and largely successful efforts to suppress transmission in Hawaii left a lot of people potentially exposed for the eventual arrival. To use a firefighting analogy, by trying to put out every small fire (Complete lockdown and quarantine) rather than using controlled burns (targeted measures coupled with appropriate medical capacity and contact tracing), there has been a lot of dry tinder available for the wildfire to consume.
Locking down with nearly complete isolation, and hoping a vaccine arrives one day may work for New Zealand which has a much more self-sustaining economy, but if the virus gets loose before the vaccine - all hell can break loose - which is what I think we are seeing in Hawaii right now coupled with an economic disaster.
I’m not advocating herd immunity or not trying any targeted public health measures. I do think that complete lockdowns and 14 day mandatory quarantines without testing exceptions are heavy handed and end up backfiring in the long run.
View attachment 25256View attachment 25257View attachment 25258