• Welcome to the FREE TUGBBS forums! The absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 32 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 32 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 32nd anniversary: Happy 32nd Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    All subscribers auto-entered to win all free TUG membership giveaways!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

You're Being Lied to About Electric Cars

I do not know anyone who owns a Ford EV. A car dealer I know use to brag how Ford had 40% of the new vehicle registrations in San Diego County
reminds me when Bill recently had the 1000 ICEs per 1 EV idea that got me thinking about what I see. Repeat what I realized then: round here you'd think Tesla is one of "The Big 3", and at least one of the orig Big 3 is almost kaput.

My favorite Big 3? Bird, McHale and Parish, maybe the original "Big 3" too. P Pierce, K Garnett & R Allen close behind.

I don't live in SD county, but I'd be surprised if Ford has 20%, unless SD county has a heckuva lotta F-150s, etc away from the coast (of course, as I say many times ... I KNOW that data is readily available) ... quick search confounded by AI, which is pathetically unable to understand primary data sources ... but

what I read makes me think Ford has < 10%. :shrug: I think F-150 is the #1 seller and it is only a few %. The data IS available. I have seen it, but can't find it quickly today
 
Last edited:
Do you use your Sienna for a lot of local errands where the daily driving is generally under 30-40 miles per day? This is where PHEVs are ideal - whereby the miles that the battery alone can power the vehicle cover either the entirety or the majority of the daily driven miles. That way your daily driving is basically 100% covered by charging overnight at your home. A standard outlet works better for charging PHEVs since the battery pack is much smaller than a BEV, so in most cases you would never need to install a EV charger in your home for a PHEV.

My sister has a Prius Prime and plug it into the outdoor outlet near the driveway. These look way better than the old Prius, imo.

Bill
 
BYD and a few other Chinese manufacturers have some compelling EVs these days. Longevity is TBD - but still - in some ways I wish the US would stop with the protectionist economic policies and let consumers save 25-50% on EVs in the US market. We keep hearing how people want cheaper EVs - letting Chinese EVs into the US marketplace would solve that problem literally overnight. This is coming from someone who is a major Tesla investor and consumer.

The problem is all of these Chinese companies have significant ties to the PRC which is a know problem with Intelligence agencies and politicians. These ties are the reason these products aren't going to be coming to North America and most of Europe. If you look at Chinese telecommunications you see the same problem with spyware and data collection.

It's never going to happen and probably for reasons other than trade protection which is another good reason to keep them out. China exports 80% ice to 20% EV. China is the largest exporter of ice vehicles in the world. China exported about 6 1/2 million ice vehicles last year. In contrast, the last report was the USA exported about 1.5 million in 2023.

Bill
 
reminds me when Bill recently had the 1000 ICEs per 1 EV idea that got me thinking about what I see. Repeat what I realized then: round here you'd think Tesla is one of "The Big 3", and at least one of the orig Big 3 is almost kaput.

My favorite Big 3? Bird, McHale and Parish, maybe the original "Big 3" too. P Pierce, K Garnett & R Allen close behind.

I don't live in SD county, but I'd be surprised if Ford has 20%, unless SD county has a heckuva lotta F-150s, etc away from the coast (of course, as I say many times ... I KNOW that data is readily available) ... quick search confounded by AI, which is pathetically unable to understand primary data sources ... but

what I read makes me think Ford has < 10%. :shrug: I think F-150 is the #1 seller and it is only a few %. The data IS available. I have seen it, but can't find it quickly today

While we were at Huntington Beach the ratio of any EV to ice was really heavy to ice. We were also in Sacramento, LA, Palm Springs and many places where I thought ev's would be popular because of gas prices. I think the ratio is much higher than 1000-1 outside of the niche EV areas in California.

With the EV rule of being able to drive in the CA carpool lane now gone and tickets being given out for about $490, EV heavy areas in CA are probably going to thin out a bit depending on how underwater the owners are on their EV , imo.

Bill
 
Here is an article that supports Advanced Autonomous Vehicle Driving Safety
Uses Waymo data (which the author is quick to point out)


Recently, Waymo's have been found to ignore school busses and they continue to drive around the busses stop signals. It's happened so often it's now under investigation. Then I wonder who will be responsible for a spilled water bottle in a Waymo should that water spill disable the EV.

Bill
 
reminds me when Bill recently had the 1000 ICEs per 1 EV idea that got me thinking about what I see. Repeat what I realized then: round here you'd think Tesla is one of "The Big 3", and at least one of the orig Big 3 is almost kaput.

My favorite Big 3? Bird, McHale and Parish, maybe the original "Big 3" too. P Pierce, K Garnett & R Allen close behind.

I don't live in SD county, but I'd be surprised if Ford has 20%, unless SD county has a heckuva lotta F-150s, etc away from the coast (of course, as I say many times ... I KNOW that data is readily available) ... quick search confounded by AI, which is pathetically unable to understand primary data sources ... but

what I read makes me think Ford has < 10%. :shrug: I think F-150 is the #1 seller and it is only a few %. The data IS available. I have seen it, but can't find it quickly today
Best selling vehicles in the US 2024: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/g60385784/bestselling-cars-2024/

Top 10 best selling vehicles in the US 2024 by car, SUV, and truck: https://www.autoevolution.com/news/top-30-best-selling-cars-suvs-and-trucks-246062.html
 
With the EV rule of being able to drive in the CA carpool lane now gone and tickets being given out for about $490, EV heavy areas in CA are probably going to thin out a bit depending on how underwater the owners are on their EV , imo.

Bill
Cali will continue to offer aggressive electrification incentives regardless of what the Feds choose to do - so I doubt it. It's not like a light switch and all of a sudden everyone stops buying EVs - as the reasons most people buy EVs have little to do with incentives. Sure we will see a lower demand in Q4 2025 due to demand in Q3 2025 being pulled forward due to the expiration of the federal tax incentives - but we will likely see US states offer higher tax rebates and incentives over the next year or so, especially in the absence of federal incentives. By the Feds own admission - all of this new legislation will only drop the average new vehicle price by $1000 - considering it's $50k right now - $49k doesn't make a huge difference. In other words, it's mostly political hype - not real world savings. This will likely result in the "big three", who cannot figure out how to manufacture BEVs profitably like Tesla, dropping BEVs from their lineups - which IMHO is only good for Tesla - as they will pick up market share - and as BEV adoption continues to grow - it will be advantage Tesla. Only time will tell, but I think in five years' time, especially when FSD goes Unsupervised in 2026 and the average consumer realizes they no longer have to drive themselves around and can own a vehicle that is provably much safer than any human driven vehicle, and can recover all that drive time for actual productive use or leisure use, the big three will be in real trouble, as they will have no answer for this technology any time soon.

EDIT: For example, last month we installed a 21.5kw solar array on our south facing roofing. From this point forward, that array will basically cover 100% of our annual electric consumption - including our Tesla EV. So, in other words, as long as we're in this house, we will never pay for "fuel" again. How much does everyone spend on gas every month on average? Most folks spend $200-400 a month on gas alone. That's not possible with any ICE vehicle.
 
Last edited:
My sister has a Prius Prime and plug it into the outdoor outlet near the driveway. These look way better than the old Prius, imo.

Bill
The Prius Prime is a nice-looking PHEV without a doubt, IMHO.
 
Recently, Waymo's have been found to ignore school busses and they continue to drive around the busses stop signals. It's happened so often it's now under investigation. Then I wonder who will be responsible for a spilled water bottle in a Waymo should that water spill disable the EV.

Bill
Meanwhile FSD 14.1.2 doesn't ignore school buses and honors the stop signals - even hand signals - all day long.
 
Recently, Waymo's have been found to ignore school busses and they continue to drive around the busses stop signals. It's happened so often it's now under investigation. Then I wonder who will be responsible for a spilled water bottle in a Waymo should that water spill disable the EV.

Bill
People spill water or other liquids in Tesla vehicles every day - no issues at all.
 
Cali will continue to offer aggressive electrification incentives regardless of what the Feds choose to do - so I doubt it. It's not like a light switch and all of a sudden everyone stops buying EVs - as the reasons most people buy EVs have little to do with incentives. Sure we will see a lower demand in Q4 2025 due to demand in Q3 2025 being pulled forward due to the expiration of the federal tax incentives - but we will likely see US states offer higher tax rebates and incentives over the next year or so, especially in the absence of federal incentives. By the Feds own admission - all of this new legislation will only drop the average new vehicle price by $1000 - considering it's $50k right now - $49k doesn't make a huge difference. In other words, it's mostly political hype - not real world savings. This will likely result in the "big three", who cannot figure out how to manufacture BEVs profitably like Tesla, dropping BEVs from their lineups - which IMHO is only good for Tesla - as they will pick up market share - and as BEV adoption continues to grow - it will be advantage Tesla. Only time will tell, but I think in five years' time, especially when FSD goes Unsupervised in 2026 and the average consumer realizes they no longer have to drive themselves around and can own a vehicle that is provably much safer than any human driven vehicle, and can recover all that drive time for actual productive use or leisure use, the big three will be in real trouble, as they will have no answer for this technology any time soon.

EDIT: For example, last month we installed a 21.5kw solar array on our south facing roofing. From this point forward, that array will basically cover 100% of our annual electric consumption - including our Tesla EV. So, in other words, as long as we're in this house, we will never pay for "fuel" again. How much does everyone spend on gas every month on average? Most folks spend $200-400 a month on gas alone. That's not possible with any ICE vehicle.

You are definitely in the minority regarding your excellent electrification progress , imo. It seems like the cards are stacked against electrification in CA. The main reason most people buy ev's anywhere is it benefits them personally, imo. When gas prices come down, which it has in many places, and as emission regulations change, which they are, why would anyone bother with buying a depreciating vehicle unless they get it for nothing ?

In CA , I've read that some insurance companies are using solar panels as a reason to cancel a policy. I've also read that some insurance companies use EV chargers as a reason for non-renewal in CA. Oddly, in CA, some of the power companies won't allow solar power to be connected to grid citing black out concerns.

Bill
 
Cali will continue to offer aggressive electrification incentives regardless of what the Feds choose to do - so I doubt it. It's not like a light switch and all of a sudden everyone stops buying EVs - as the reasons most people buy EVs have little to do with incentives. Sure we will see a lower demand in Q4 2025 due to demand in Q3 2025 being pulled forward due to the expiration of the federal tax incentives - but we will likely see US states offer higher tax rebates and incentives over the next year or so, especially in the absence of federal incentives. By the Feds own admission - all of this new legislation will only drop the average new vehicle price by $1000 - considering it's $50k right now - $49k doesn't make a huge difference. In other words, it's mostly political hype - not real world savings. This will likely result in the "big three", who cannot figure out how to manufacture BEVs profitably like Tesla, dropping BEVs from their lineups - which IMHO is only good for Tesla - as they will pick up market share - and as BEV adoption continues to grow - it will be advantage Tesla. Only time will tell, but I think in five years' time, especially when FSD goes Unsupervised in 2026 and the average consumer realizes they no longer have to drive themselves around and can own a vehicle that is provably much safer than any human driven vehicle, and can recover all that drive time for actual productive use or leisure use, the big three will be in real trouble, as they will have no answer for this technology any time soon.

EDIT: For example, last month we installed a 21.5kw solar array on our south facing roofing. From this point forward, that array will basically cover 100% of our annual electric consumption - including our Tesla EV. So, in other words, as long as we're in this house, we will never pay for "fuel" again. How much does everyone spend on gas every month on average? Most folks spend $200-400 a month on gas alone. That's not possible with any ICE vehicle.
I am a big fan of solar
Don't believe me
Drop by the Wind Power Thread some time

My point here is that your solar installation had/has a cost
Tax benefits reduce your costs
But your electricity is still not "free"
Could be considerably less than what you were paying the utility company
Which would make your energy costs for your car really, really low
But solar electricity is not "free"

If you are lucky enough to be in an area where you can sell electricity back to the utility company
Then you have a dream scenario
You are getting a positive ROI on your investment in solar panels
And "free" solar electricity
 
You are definitely in the minority regarding your excellent electrification progress , imo. It seems like the cards are stacked against electrification in CA. The main reason most people buy ev's anywhere is it benefits them personally, imo. When gas prices come down, which it has in many places, and as emission regulations change, which they are, why would anyone bother with buying a depreciating vehicle unless they get it for nothing ?
Actually I'm not, I'm a follower and late to the game in many respects. Cali literally has hundreds of thousands of residential solar installations, and many of those people own BEVs. Solar is much more prevalent in Cali given the higher grid electric costs. 50% of the people I know that live in Cali have solar arrays for example. Anecdotal obviously, but telling at the same time. The more expensive the grid power, the more cost effective solar becomes.

You seem to be under the impression that BEVs are merely a financial decision. They are a better vehicle in most respects when compared to ICE vehicles. Our Tesla is literally the best vehicle we've ever owned. It's quieter, faster, handles better, has more interior room, better storage, and much better tech than any other vehicle we've ever owned. The ownership loyalty for Tesla beats out any other auto manufacturer - even today. That's not because of financial reasons - that's because it's a great product, period. Even with all of the other BEVs coming to market, Tesla still does well:

1764883126148.png

In CA , I've read that some insurance companies are using solar panels as a reason to cancel a policy. I've also read that some insurance companies use EV chargers as a reason for non-renewal in CA. Oddly, in CA, some of the power companies won't allow solar power to be connected to grid citing black out concerns.

Bill
What are your sources for these claims?
 
I am a big fan of solar
Don't believe me
Drop by the Wind Power Thread some time
I need to head over there - I haven't been tracking that thread closely.
My point here is that your solar installation had/has a cost
Tax benefits reduce your costs
But your electricity is still not "free"
Could be considerably less than what you were paying the utility company
Which would make your energy costs for your car really, really low
But solar electricity is not "free"
Yes, there's a cost - but it's less than our monthly electric bill on average - which is around $450/month (we are 100% electric - except for a backup oil burner that only runs when the temps drop below 15 degrees - which is rare). The gross cost of the solar array was $51k. $6k in up-front power company rebates, $15k federal tax credits, $30k subsidized solar energy loan from Delaware state for 2.99% over 10 years - payment is $280/month. 450-280=170/month net monthly savings.
If you are lucky enough to be in an area where you can sell electricity back to the utility company
Then you have a dream scenario
You are getting a positive ROI on your investment in solar panels
And "free" solar electricity
Delmarva Power offers 1:1 net-metering for solar, and SRECs. If we choose to stay here long term we'll probably add a Tesla Powerwall 3 system for backup power eventually - to go completely grid independent. I'd only have to add 1-2 PW3's with the extender packs to cover nightly usage when the array isn't producing. That would also allow us to use the BEV battery as a backup source if/when needed.
 
Do you use your Sienna for a lot of local errands where the daily driving is generally under 30-40 miles per day? This is where PHEVs are ideal - whereby the miles that the battery alone can power the vehicle cover either the entirety or the majority of the daily driven miles. That way your daily driving is basically 100% covered by charging overnight at your home. A standard outlet works better for charging PHEVs since the battery pack is much smaller than a BEV, so in most cases you would never need to install a EV charger in your home for a PHEV.
Most of our driving is local, normal errands and visiting family and friends. We do take one 5 week trip every summer up through Wyoming and Montana to visit family up there, put 4000 miles in the new Sienna. There are nine of us (4 adults and 5 grandkids). We now take 2 minivans. My daughter’s Odyssey averaged 22 mpg, we averaged over 35 in the Sienna. But we will definitely get the PHEV Sienna when available. Other than the odd trip out of town, we would probably not have to use much gas until every July…
 
I need to head over there - I haven't been tracking that thread closely.

Yes, there's a cost - but it's less than our monthly electric bill on average - which is around $450/month (we are 100% electric - except for a backup oil burner that only runs when the temps drop below 15 degrees - which is rare). The gross cost of the solar array was $51k. $6k in up-front power company rebates, $15k federal tax credits, $30k subsidized solar energy loan from Delaware state for 2.99% over 10 years - payment is $280/month. 450-280=170/month net monthly savings.

Delmarva Power offers 1:1 net-metering for solar, and SRECs. If we choose to stay here long term we'll probably add a Tesla Powerwall 3 system for backup power eventually - to go completely grid independent. I'd only have to add 1-2 PW3's with the extender packs to cover nightly usage when the array isn't producing. That would also allow us to use the BEV battery as a backup source if/when needed.
That kind of math I understand
Your savings are significant
Your EV "fuel" costs are part of your monthly payment
You are protected from the anticipated rate increases coming down the line from:
1.) AI energy demand increases pass through by the utilities
2.) Grid upgrades

The cost of backup batteries is dropping significantly as LFP battery production ramps up
Not sure about the PW3 since I am not a part of the Tesla infrastructure

Avoid the wind thread
It is a rehash of current administration policy and ignorance of the cost of energy production
 
You seem to be under the impression that BEVs are merely a financial decision.

For the majority of all car buyers of any kind, yes, it's a major financial decision. If you look at the demographic of the usual Tesla buyer you find a white male at around 48 years old earning over $140,000 a year. This demographic can easily afford the massive depreciation and other costs of an EV. The median income for all males at 48 years old is between $30,000 - $70,000 depending on ethnicity. For this majority of the demographic of the 48 year old male, it would probably be a huge financial decision.

So you are probably right regarding your demographic as this group can afford it.

I thought the Tesla accident numbers were interesting. The research doesn't break the accidents down by gender. It does break down the gender of owners at 23% female and 77% male.

Bill


Do Tesla owners really cause more accidents?​

According to a recent study published by LendingTree, Tesla owners have the highest accident rate of 30 vehicle brands, with 23.54 accidents per 1,000 drivers. They got at this information by analyzing millions of insurance quotes. Only Tesla, Ram and Subaru owners had more than 20 accidents per 1,000 drivers.
 
Top