DannyTS
TUG Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2018
- Messages
- 5,753
- Reaction score
- 3,076
If they get the price right, I think that they will be successfulCorrect, $1995 for all the weeks, not for each week.
If they get the price right, I think that they will be successfulCorrect, $1995 for all the weeks, not for each week.
We are just speculating, there is no official communication from Marriott/VistanaWhy am I not getting any of these emails???
I am a 5 week Vistana/3 week Marriott owner.
Hellllllloooooo. I am here!
I think @GrayFal is referring to the email from post #1.We are just speculating, there is no official communication from Marriott/Vistana
Yup.....I think @GrayFal is referring to the email from post #1.
Yup.....
Thank you, I did check for my account and my husbands as well.Go to your Dashboard under Communications and ensure you have checked to receive emails. That's the only thing I can think of.
I think that you are proving some people's point that Marriott will have to come with a good offer to entice owners like you. You are not missing anything IMONot that I understand these things too well, am I missing something? But, why would I pay to have my resale Lagunamar week go into the Marriott system when I'm happy using the two weeks I get with our 2 bedroom at the Westin. And we've traded it as well on II...just stayed at the Marriott Aruba Surf for two weeks, stayed at Harborside for one last November? Please let me know what detail I'm missing that would give me an incentive to do that?
You could still trade in II but supposedly (according to sales) resale folks wont be able to trade Internally even within Vistana. They did not know we were resale and were trying to reassure us but when I asked about resale was told we would need to spend 30,000 to buy Marriott points and qualify our resale week. May not be true but it is somewhat concerning. They did it to Marriott owners so it is feasibleI think that you are proving some people's point that Marriott will have to come with a good offer to entice owners like you. You are not missing anything IMO
You could still trade in II but supposedly (according to sales) resale folks wont be able to trade Internally even within Vistana. They did not know we were resale and were trying to reassure us but when I asked about resale was told we would need to spend 30,000 to buy Marriott points and qualify our resale week. May not be true but it is somewhat concerning. They did it to Marriott owners so it is feasible
I would disregard anything that sales people say at this moment:You could still trade in II but supposedly (according to sales) resale folks wont be able to trade Internally even within Vistana. They did not know we were resale and were trying to reassure us but when I asked about resale was told we would need to spend 30,000 to buy Marriott points and qualify our resale week. May not be true but it is somewhat concerning. They did it to Marriott owners so it is feasible
YOu have found what many Marriott owners found. If you use your weeks at your home resort, there is little benefit to enrolling weeks in the DC program. There are probably at least still 50% of the eligible Marriott weeks not enrolled in the program. If they open enrollment up to Vistana weeks, they would probably price it in a similar manner and expect the same enrollment rates.Not that I understand these things too well, am I missing something? But, why would I pay to have my resale Lagunamar week go into the Marriott system when I'm happy using the two weeks I get with our 2 bedroom at the Westin. And we've traded it as well on II...just stayed at the Marriott Aruba Surf for two weeks, stayed at Harborside for one last November? Please let me know what detail I'm missing that would give me an incentive to do that?
YOu have found what many Marriott owners found. If you use your weeks at your home resort, there is little benefit to enrolling weeks in the DC program. There are probably at least still 50% of the eligible Marriott weeks not enrolled in the program. If they open enrollment up to Vistana weeks, they would probably price it in a similar manner and expect the same enrollment rates.
You could still trade in II but supposedly (according to sales) resale folks wont be able to trade Internally even within Vistana. They did not know we were resale and were trying to reassure us but when I asked about resale was told we would need to spend 30,000 to buy Marriott points and qualify our resale week. May not be true but it is somewhat concerning. They did it to Marriott owners so it is feasible
it is very possible that Marriott may decide to keep multiple layers of reservation. Large companies value simplicity though so i would not be surprised to see a full integration of all programs. It is not clear how much they dislike the mandatory Vistana deeds but for sure they dislike more the confusion and the costs associated with running multiple programs at the same time.The biggest question lies with how they would do any type of enrollment and how would mandatory weeks be impacted. Marriott certainly doesn't want an easy resale entry in to their DC program. I would think they would keep the previous VSN/StarOption program and simply allow you to also enroll your week in DC. If you enroll you can still either use your home resort, book with StarOptions, exchange through II or elect DC points. This way they can still freeze resale mandatory weeks out of the DC program since they aren't replacing the VSN system.
While they may like simplicity, I think they also prefer to not take benefits away that people currently enjoy and utilize. It also makes for an easier implementation and less chance of legal challenge down the road. If people don't lose anything and only gain a certain benefit they are willing to pay for, they really can't complain about it.it is very possible that Marriott may decide to keep multiple layers of reservation. Large companies value simplicity though so i would not be surprised to see a full integration of all programs. It is not clear how much they dislike the mandatory Vistana deeds but for sure they dislike more the confusion and the costs associated with running multiple programs at the same time.
i agree with you, i just do no see anyone challenging them if they just convert the number of Staroptions to a number of DP and give access to all the network. I know i would not and i do not see why anyone wouldWhile they may like simplicity, I think they also prefer to not take benefits away that people currently enjoy and utilize. It also makes for an easier implementation and less chance of legal challenge down the road. If people don't lose anything and only gain a certain benefit they are willing to pay for, they really can't complain about it.
While they may like simplicity, I think they also prefer to not take benefits away that people currently enjoy and utilize. It also makes for an easier implementation and less chance of legal challenge down the road. If people don't lose anything and only gain a certain benefit they are willing to pay for, they really can't complain about it.
i agree with you, i just do no see anyone challenging them if they just convert the number of Staroptions to a number of DP and give access to all the network. I know i would not and i do not see why anyone would
Since it is fun....Has anybody thought about how the timeshare "elite" programs would fall together? They seem pretty far apart.All this speculation is fun..