• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $23,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $23 Million dollars
  • Wish you could meet up with other TUG members? Well look no further as this annual event has been going on for years in Orlando! How to Attend the TUG January Get-Together!
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Trouble - Marriott Grand Residence Tahoe [Management Agreement in Jeopardy?]

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
51,441
Reaction score
22,898
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
Actually, the Trust owners are not subsidizing the legacy owners per se; the assessments are the same per interest whether owned by the Trust or the few remaining individuals. However, both the legacy fractional owners and the Trust owners are grossly carrying the brand standards for the whole owners. The whole owners have all the same amenities at the property, but don't pay for them.
A big expense for timeshares is housekeeping and front desk. I doubt whole owners have any of these amenities. They don't get a weekly clean, do they? How are housekeeping fees paid for owners at this resort? I know at GRC they pay a housekeeping fee separately from the maintenance fees. You seem to be rather cagey (perhaps understandably) and not providing a lot of actual details. Just accusations.
 

rcdcowner557

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2024
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
Interesting posting. Based on the username @rcdcowner557 and the discussion of subsidizing whole owners and legacy owners, I would guess the property is one of the Ritz-Carlton Destination Clubs that is co-located with whole ownership residences. It's not really clear what the problem is as the discussion of who is subsidizing what seems fluid. It's also not clear what amenities are causing the differences and whether there are possible reasons for the cost allocations. I'm a bit interested because I just picked up a fractional at a sister resort; can you provide any details on what the charges and amenities are?
The key is to look at the governing documents. MVW is allocating costs based on estimated usage, which is problematic for a number of reasons, first and foremost that that method of allocating costs is not allowed by our governing documents. We never would have bought into a condominium building where how much we used a doorman, etc. was the basis of how much we paid. It would be great if that were the metric, because we don't use any of the amenities (wine night, porter, valet, concierge). However, the whole owners use them every day for everything from parking their car to delivering their door dash to bringing up their groceries. What is even more absurd is the "estimated usage" was from a time where the entire mix of whole owner units was different from fractionally owned units.
 

rcdcowner557

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2024
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
A big expense for timeshares is housekeeping and front desk. I doubt whole owners have any of these amenities. They don't get a weekly clean, do they? How are housekeeping fees paid for owners at this resort? I know at GRC they pay a housekeeping fee separately from the maintenance fees. You seem to be rather cagey (perhaps understandably) and not providing a lot of actual details. Just accusations.
housekeeping expenses are not at issue. What is at issue are all the staff in the common areas who serve fractional and whole owners on the same terms. You have the same amenities whether you are a fractional owner or a whole owner, with the exception of housekeeping; we have taken no issue with that charge. It is the charge for the concierges, porters, doormen and valet that are at issue. The whole owners avail themselves of this excellent staff day-in and day-out. There are 76 wholly-owned residences and only 25 fractionally-owned residences; all are to be treated the same under the governing documents; yet MVW has allocated the vast majority of the expenses for the staff to the fractional owners.
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
51,441
Reaction score
22,898
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
housekeeping expenses are not at issue. What is at issue are all the staff in the common areas who serve fractional and whole owners on the same terms. You have the same amenities whether you are a fractional owner or a whole owner, with the exception of housekeeping; we have taken no issue with that charge. It is the charge for the concierges, porters, doormen and valet that are at issue. The whole owners avail themselves of this excellent staff day-in and day-out. There are 76 wholly-owned residences and only 25 fractionally-owned residences; all are to be treated the same under the governing documents; yet MVW has allocated the vast majority of the expenses for the staff to the fractional owners.
Perhaps the BOD/HOA needs to hire their own independent council to review the documents and make the case.
 

rcdcowner557

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2024
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
The key is to look at the governing documents. MVW is allocating costs based on estimated usage, which is problematic for a number of reasons, first and foremost that that method of allocating costs is not allowed by our governing documents. We never would have bought into a condominium building where how much we used a doorman, etc. was the basis of how much we paid. It would be great if that were the metric, because we don't use any of the amenities (wine night, porter, valet, concierge). However, the whole owners use them every day for everything from parking their car to delivering their door dash to bringing up their groceries. What is even more absurd is the "estimated usage" was from a time where the entire mix of whole owner units was different from fractionally owned units.
MVW is now pushing us to amend the governing documents to legalize what they have been doing. It will be interesting to see how this develops because the Trust owns the vast majority of the fractional interests, so if the MVC Trust BOD (controlled by MVW employees) votes to amend the governing documents to legalize what they have been doing, keep your eyes posted for the lawsuit that will ensue. I am putting this out here because our property cannot be the only one where this is occurring. I would recommend anybody who is in a MVW-managed property where the Trust owns a large portion to examine the cost allocations in the property wide budget to make sure they comply.
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
51,441
Reaction score
22,898
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
MVW is now pushing us to amend the governing documents to legalize what they have been doing. It will be interesting to see how this develops because the Trust owns the vast majority of the fractional interests, so if the MVC Trust BOD (controlled by MVW employees) votes to amend the governing documents to legalize what they have been doing, keep your eyes posted for the lawsuit that will ensue. I am putting this out here because our property cannot be the only one where this is occurring. I would recommend anybody who is in a MVW-managed property where the Trust owns a large portion to examine the cost allocations in the property wide budget to make sure they comply.
I don't think there are very many properties in the MVC system that have whole ownership and fractional at the same resort. Perhaps only some of the RCC and maybe Kauai Lagoons.
 

rcdcowner557

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2024
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
Perhaps the BOD/HOA needs to hire their own independent council to review the documents and make the case.
We did. Two outside legal opinions came back saying the current allocations are not allowed by the governing documents. Again, stay tuned for the legal action that sadly may have to ensue, and, in the interim, check the governing documents and allocations at your own properties.
 

rcdcowner557

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2024
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
Interesting posting. Based on the username @rcdcowner557 and the discussion of subsidizing whole owners and legacy owners, I would guess the property is one of the Ritz-Carlton Destination Clubs that is co-located with whole ownership residences. It's not really clear what the problem is as the discussion of who is subsidizing what seems fluid. It's also not clear what amenities are causing the differences and whether there are possible reasons for the cost allocations. I'm a bit interested because I just picked up a fractional at a sister resort; can you provide any details on what the charges and amenities are?
If the fractional interest you just picked up happens to be at Vail, look at the amendments to the governing documents made in 2023 and ask your BOD to explain.
 

Eric B

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2017
Messages
6,267
Reaction score
6,017
Resorts Owned
Vacation Village, Wyndham, WorldMark, Vistana, Vidanta, Flora Farms, HGVC Max, and some independents
It isn't; it's St Thomas and there aren't any whole ownerships there so I don't think we'll have the same problems.
 

pedro47

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
23,239
Reaction score
9,371
Location
East Coast
The key is to look at the governing documents. MVW is allocating costs based on estimated usage, which is problematic for a number of reasons, first and foremost that that method of allocating costs is not allowed by our governing documents. We never would have bought into a condominium building where how much we used a doorman, etc. was the basis of how much we paid. It would be great if that were the metric, because we don't use any of the amenities (wine night, porter, valet, concierge). However, the whole owners use them every day for everything from parking their car to delivering their door dash to bringing up their groceries. What is even more absurd is the "estimated usage" was from a time where the entire mix of whole owner units was different from fractionally owned units.
What page or pages are you referring to in the governing documents?
 

rcdcowner557

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2024
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
What page or pages are you referring to in the governing documents?
Every set of governing documents is different, but all have a section that addresses the purpose of assessments and how they are calculated. Accordingly, I cannot answer the question with respect to your property's governing documents. I would just look at all the sections that address assessments and consult a qualified attorney if you have questions about them.
 

rcdcowner557

Guest
Joined
Dec 15, 2024
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
I believe the "firing" comment was regarding the Board member MVW is trying to get elected. They could "fire" that person "fire" and replace with a more loyal servant. As they do with their permanent Board seat. That changes from time to time at their discretion.

Similarly, this is normally a volunteer Board. Presumably, the Marriott candidate is not doing this for free. There is zero transparency regarding compensation. Likewise, this candidate claims to have served on boards at over 30 properties. Essentially making a career out of being "their guy". Loyalty is in the bag. At how many other properties was it openly disclosed of the relationship between the candidate and MVW? Willing to bet zero. It certainly wasn't in the bio for the GRC Board. His blurb made no mention of serving on behalf of the Trust and was as vague as possible regarding career history.
This describes one of the guys they put on our board. Freakishly vague about gainful employment. I actually felt both the Trust reps on our board might have been selected by MVW for their lack of analytical or issue spotting ability. I was frankly shocked and just left wondering how and why MVW picked these guys to be on the MVC TOA Board. Not distinguished by any metric - Average Joe 1 and 2 overseeing the MVC TOA budget of what, $700 million? How convenient for MVW.
 
Last edited:

cubigbird

Tug Review Crew Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
1,804
Reaction score
706
Location
Western US
Resorts Owned
Westin Lagunamar, Westin Kierland X2, Westin St John-Sunset Bay X2, Westin Desert Willow, Westin Aventuras
MVW is now pushing us to amend the governing documents to legalize what they have been doing. It will be interesting to see how this develops because the Trust owns the vast majority of the fractional interests, so if the MVC Trust BOD (controlled by MVW employees) votes to amend the governing documents to legalize what they have been doing, keep your eyes posted for the lawsuit that will ensue. I am putting this out here because our property cannot be the only one where this is occurring. I would recommend anybody who is in a MVW-managed property where the Trust owns a large portion to examine the cost allocations in the property wide budget to make sure they comply.
Perhaps a reason why sales is so hell bent on getting owners to trade in their deeds to “upgrade” to points.
 
Top