From
@jme post above, in the article was this statement:
..."[T]here’s clear scientific evidence now by all the droplet experiments that happen and that others have done to show that a mask does prevent droplets from reaching others," Birx told "Fox News Sunday," recognizing that Americans will want to get out over the holiday weekend. "And out of respect for each other, as Americans that care for each other we need to be wearing masks in public when we cannot social distance. It’s really critically important, we have the scientific evidence of how important mask wearing is to prevent those droplets from reaching others.”...
I just returned from a trip to town today and was paying even more attention that usual to the mask / no mask decision. It is worth noting that my trip involved stops at Home Depot, Kroger and Sam's. The timing of these visits were chosen in the hope of low crowd counts in each of these places of business, and sure enough, all three were sparsely populated during today's visit.
I did not - and do not - wear a mask. To be clear, I am not saying my decision is right or wrong but given the circumstances in our area, applying the standard noted by Dr. Blix above with respect to wearing a mask
in the places I regularly visit, at the time(s) regularly visited and with the usual population density in these establishments during these visits does not seem to be a necessary act
because a minimum social distance -and more- can be maintained at all times.
My goal in making this point
is not to inflame this conversation, but to draw some consideration toward the decision that because a person chooses NOT to wear a mask, it does not follow that person is acting in an irresponsible way
based solely on this decision. Is the person maintaining (at least) proper social distancing minimums and taking appropriate actions when sneezing or coughing - these things are harder to measure quickly, but are just as important toward stopping the spread of ANY virus.
I suppose another way of saying this is I live in a more rural area than most TUG'gers (I suspect) and what may be necessary in the big city doesn't apply everywhere equally. In reading responses over the past few days, I am pretty confident most TUG'gers would agree that one standard cannot apply everywhere and that we most be local in our approach to COVID 19, but at the same time, things can change - and our - and my - approach to dealing with COVID 19 may need to change as well.