• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $23,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $23 Million dollars
  • Wish you could meet up with other TUG members? Well look no further as this annual event has been going on for years in Orlando! How to Attend the TUG January Get-Together!
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Sheraton Vistana Resort Special Assessment[MERGED]

marijalas

Tug Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
77
Reaction score
12
Location
Bethesda MD
Starwood Manipulations

I wantred to respond even though I don't have any new information to report. I have contacted Starwood - 1800-847-8262 US & CANADA, 0-800-89-5065 UK and been given the royal run-around. I requested a copy of the Charter that gives the Board of Directors their rights and copies of the board meeting that voted in these charges. The fellow said that he had mailed it out approximately 15 days ago. Lost in the mail? Really? They know where to send my bill! Starwood is delaying giving us information until we will be unable to take action, The renovations do not appear to warrant those kind of charges. These are not due to a catastophe, they are doing interior face lifts, they are not re-roofing (standard maintenance), or expanding our apartments, I don't need a granite countertop to enjoy my vacation. Further as I read other posts regarding Starwoods manipulation of points and options and values, I see less than straight forward managment. I plan on calling the State of Florida which has very strict regulations regarding Timeshare behavior and when I get this information will share. I for one have been too complacent about our timeshare and believed that if they did well for themselves they would do well for owners. I casually signed the proxy, again thinking that the board, as owners would look out for all our best interests. Todays recession and the subject of greed are too apparent. After all RCI is being sued for their behavior regarding exchanges, perhaps Starwood needs to be looked into as well.
 

botham

TUG Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
92
Reaction score
8
Location
UK
My wife and I are not at all happy with the situation, but we live in the UK and have no idea about US law. The prices seem excessive and I'd love to challenge them, but have no idea how to.

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to do this.
 

nodge

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2006
Messages
1,321
Reaction score
1
Location
Portland, Oregon
Has any court owner filed a complaint to the state of Florida for these high assessments and for us not having a say in what we want?

Also why the Courts board not respond to us owners directly if we send mail or email to them?

We may also start a petition to stop the assessment,

James

Here is a link to the official complaint form for the Florida government organization responsible for ensuring timeshare owners don't get screwed by Florida-based timeshare developers, timeshare management companies, and the like.

If anyone suspects foul play regarding these assessments, or even that they were not adequately informed, etc., this organization can't do a darned thing about it . . . . until somebody first complains to it, in writing, using this form. I suspect the more complaints it gets, the more likely it will do something.

For everyone upset over recent developments at Vistana Resort, if you haven’t filled out and mailed this form, you have no right to complain.

-nodge
 

marijalas

Tug Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
77
Reaction score
12
Location
Bethesda MD
Special Assessment Contacts & Info

Hi again...I have been doing more research and want to pass this on to you all. Firstly I contacted the State of Florida and was given the Statutes that apply to timeshares - 721.13 -14,16, 53, 55,56 . You can read them at www.leg.state.fl.us, My next step is to call state of Florida Timeshare Bureau at 1-850-488-1122. We can all do this. The statutes are pretty clear and I cannot see that Starwood can charge these fees. On the Tug website itself under generalinformation:Annual Budgets/Assessments and Reserve Funding for Timeshares located in Florida <http://www.tug2.net/advice/budget.htm>
Letter from Florida Bureau of Timeshare. Subject - Swiss Americian Bank <http://www.tug2.net/advice/SAB.htm>
A group effort or committee might be effective to combat the stonewalling we have been getting from Starwood regarding this issue.
Any and all ideas for next steps would be great.
I have set up an email for this purpose _ I hope I am not out of line with the TUG BBS - it is mariatimeshare@yahoo.com. I can create a list of those who want to start a petition or other action in this matter. Hope to hear from you...Maria
 
Last edited:

DeniseM

Moderator
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
58,631
Reaction score
10,563
Location
Northern, CA
Resorts Owned
WKORV, WKV, SDO, 4-Kauai Beach Villas, Island Park Village (Yellowstone), Hyatt High Sierra, Dolphin's Cove (Anaheim) NEW: 3 Lawa'i Beach Resort!
Maria - what you are doing is perfectly fine - good luck to you!
 

Jeffy3

newbie
Joined
Sep 8, 2008
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Location
Springfield, Pa
We spent a week in our court townhouse last week and was able to see the sample renovated townhouse. A couple of other owners were there two and we were all in agreement that the cost being charged is outrageous compared to what is being done.
 

damianinpa

Guest
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
56
Reaction score
4
Location
Pennsylvania
I sent an email explaining that I feel the cost of all of this should come from the resort, not me. Also stated their cost figures seemed extrememly high. Here was the email I got back:

Thank you for contacting Vistana Spa Condominium Association and expressing your concerns with us. Owner feedback is something we value and take very seriously.

The Board of Directors and your Association approved a refurbishment project to completely update the interior of the villas. Many of the changes that will take place are being planned to provide an upscale feel that you as an owner have come to expect. In the competitive world we live in, we must maintain ourselves as one of the top vacation destinations in Orlando. The Board of Directors is entrusted to ensure that each unit meets industry and brand standards.

We have been in contact with the highest caliber designers in the hospitality industry to combine a look of comfort and relaxation with luxury and elegance in mind. Using items of the highest quality will ensure a longer period of enjoyment and satisfaction for you and your family.

In the past we have replaced items for which Replacement Reserves were allocated. This is the first refurbishment that includes items not in the reserve plan, such as countertops, cabinets, and bathrooms. Reserve funds that are allocated for specific items will be accessed as previously established in the reserve funds. A refurbishment takes into consideration the aesthetic life of the furnishings, while the replacement reserves consider the useful life.

The Board of Directors and your Association reviewed and analyzed all avenues available for a cost effective project. The refurbishment has been divided into 3 installments to ease the burden of the assessment. Please contact Association Management at 1-800-847-8262 should you require payment arrangements. Please note the Board must have the funds available to begin the construction process. This is the reason why we are billing the owners in advance.

Voting on this matter and most issues associated with the management and operations of the associations is solely at the discretion of the Vistana Spa Board of Directors, which is governed by the Articles of Incorporation and the Declaration of the Association.

We strongly encourage owner participation in the next upcoming annual meeting. This will be a great opportunity to bring up any other issues you may have regarding this project.

We are very pleased and excited with the changes to come and are confident you will not be disappointed with the final end result. Once again, we appreciate the time you have taken to provide your feedback. We value you as an owner and we look forward to serving you in your future vacation plans for years to come.

Sincerely,

Aixa Garcia

SVO Association Management
 

timeos2

Tug Review Crew: Rookie
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
11,183
Reaction score
5
Location
Rochester, NY
A few comments

I sent an email explaining that I feel the cost of all of this should come from the resort, not me. Also stated their cost figures seemed extrememly high. Here was the email I got back:

You ARE the resort! Why is it some people seem to feel there is a resort / Association that has control/money and then there is "us" - the owner? You are one in the same when you own a timeshare/condo.

In the past we have replaced items for which Replacement Reserves were allocated. This is the first refurbishment that includes items not in the reserve plan, such as countertops, cabinets, and bathrooms. Reserve funds that are allocated for specific items will be accessed as previously established in the reserve funds. A refurbishment takes into consideration the aesthetic life of the furnishings, while the replacement reserves consider the useful life.

Now this is bull! A well designed reserve program accounts and collects for replacements as well as longer term items such as counter tops, cabinets, floor tile and other items that wouldn't be done in a 5-7 year replacement but would be required every 10-20 years. It is pure semantics to say there is a difference. Creative though.

The Board of Directors and your Association reviewed and analyzed all avenues available for a cost effective project. The refurbishment has been divided into 3 installments to ease the burden of the assessment. Please contact Association Management at 1-800-847-8262 should you require payment arrangements. Please note the Board must have the funds available to begin the construction process. This is the reason why we are billing the owners in advance.

Voting on this matter and most issues associated with the management and operations of the associations is solely at the discretion of the Vistana Spa Board of Directors, which is governed by the Articles of Incorporation and the Declaration of the Association.

We strongly encourage owner participation in the next upcoming annual meeting. This will be a great opportunity to bring up any other issues you may have regarding this project.

We are very pleased and excited with the changes to come and are confident you will not be disappointed with the final end result. Once again, we appreciate the time you have taken to provide your feedback. We value you as an owner and we look forward to serving you in your future vacation plans for years to come.

Sincerely,

Aixa Garcia

SVO Association Management

I notice they give a number to call to pay but no contacts, except to attend the meeting, to query the Board/Management. Hiding I would say. Not the way to run a resort and certainly not the way to run a super high special assessment!
 
Last edited:

Steve P

newbie
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
NJ
Refurbishment Assessment

I own a week in the Spa section and was just notified of my $1,626 assessment. Here is a copy of the email I sent to Vistana.

Is anyone interested in consulting legal counsel for a possible class action suit?



I am appalled by the incredibly arrogant and ill-advised decision by the board embark on this renovation project for the following reasons:

1. I have served on several condo boards and never did the board have unlimited authority to spend $24,000,000 without owner approval.
2. The cost of $96,200 per unit is exorbitant. The units are barely worth that much.
3. The shortfall of 87% in reserves indicates a total lack of foresight and planning by the board.
4. An assessment of $1,626 per unit is outrageous and will result in hundreds of foreclosures.
5. Your assessment billing procedure is unfair in that you are collecting all of the money before the work even begins. With interest rates at an all-time low why not finance the renovations over a longer period of time?
6. Given the current state of the economy this plan should be postponed and scaled back.

I would urge you to rethink this project as many owners are considering legal action against the board for their total disregard of the owners’ wishes and incompetent and negligent planning in providing for adequate reserve funding over the years.

If your goal was to take back hundreds of units in foreclosure so you could resell them at a profit, you will probably succeed; but in the process you have soured me, and anyone I talk to, on the merits of time-share ownership.

:annoyed: :annoyed: :annoyed:
 

Jeffy3

newbie
Joined
Sep 8, 2008
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Location
Springfield, Pa
I own a week in the Spa section and was just notified of my $1,626 assessment. Here is a copy of the email I sent to Vistana.

Is anyone interested in consulting legal counsel for a possible class action suit?



I am appalled by the incredibly arrogant and ill-advised decision by the board embark on this renovation project for the following reasons:

1. I have served on several condo boards and never did the board have unlimited authority to spend $24,000,000 without owner approval.
2. The cost of $96,200 per unit is exorbitant. The units are barely worth that much.
3. The shortfall of 87% in reserves indicates a total lack of foresight and planning by the board.
4. An assessment of $1,626 per unit is outrageous and will result in hundreds of foreclosures.
5. Your assessment billing procedure is unfair in that you are collecting all of the money before the work even begins. With interest rates at an all-time low why not finance the renovations over a longer period of time?
6. Given the current state of the economy this plan should be postponed and scaled back.

I would urge you to rethink this project as many owners are considering legal action against the board for their total disregard of the owners’ wishes and incompetent and negligent planning in providing for adequate reserve funding over the years.

If your goal was to take back hundreds of units in foreclosure so you could resell them at a profit, you will probably succeed; but in the process you have soured me, and anyone I talk to, on the merits of time-share ownership.

:annoyed: :annoyed: :annoyed:

Excellent letter/email! You took the words right off my fingertips.
 

damianinpa

Guest
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
56
Reaction score
4
Location
Pennsylvania
Obvioulsy the majority of people who own in Vistana are not happy about this. So, this leads me to question of legality. Does the Condo Association from a legal standpoint have the right to vote for renovations and pass cost along to owners? That is the million dollar question. Only other option is to sell the timeshare which I really don't want to do. I love Vistana resort and always have a great time, but, this Cost is crazy. So, if anyone on this board is or knows a lawyer, we need to find out if they have the full right to do this and charge us for it or as owners can we challenge this.
Damian
 

timeos2

Tug Review Crew: Rookie
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
11,183
Reaction score
5
Location
Rochester, NY
yes, the Board has the right

Obvioulsy the majority of people who own in Vistana are not happy about this. So, this leads me to question of legality. Does the Condo Association from a legal standpoint have the right to vote for renovations and pass cost along to owners? That is the million dollar question. Only other option is to sell the timeshare which I really don't want to do. I love Vistana resort and always have a great time, but, this Cost is crazy. So, if anyone on this board is or knows a lawyer, we need to find out if they have the full right to do this and charge us for it or as owners can we challenge this.
Damian

In fact they have a fiduciary responsibility to make required repairs and to bill the cost to the owners. The right to vote occurs when you elect the Board members and place them in charge.

Now they should be looking for owner input - not hiding - and trying to explain why things are needed and why the costs seem so high. While they have the right to do what they've done if its really needed they should be actively promoting that fact & selling it to the owners. Since they aren't it raises serious questions they need to answer.
 

LisaRex

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2007
Messages
6,792
Reaction score
317
Location
'burbs of Cincinnati, OH
Resorts Owned
Used to own: WKORV-N; SVV - Bella
I don't know. Courts don't like one-sided agreements. And this one seems very one-sided. What if they wanted to install gold faucets and 1200 count Egyptian cotton sheets? What if they wanted to hire one of their relatives to do all the work at a 200% mark-up? Regardless of what the Board says, no contract gives someone unfettered rights to do whatever the hell they want to do while forcing you to foot the bill. For a contract to be valid in the United States it has to be reasonable and equitable.

If I were you I'd create a new thread with a much simpler title "Vistana Special Assessment" or "Soliciting Sheraton Vistana Timeshare Owners" in the title so that Owners using Yahoo to search it will find their way to this thread. That way, you can use your power in numbers to put pressure on the board to at least hear from the owners before imposing this special assessment. I'd also contact an attorney in the State of Florida specializing in contracts to ask his opinion.
 

Ken555

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
14,925
Reaction score
6,035
Location
Los Angeles
Resorts Owned
Westin Kierland
Sheraton Desert Oasis
In fact they have a fiduciary responsibility to make required repairs and to bill the cost to the owners. The right to vote occurs when you elect the Board members and place them in charge.

Are you certain? Most HOA Boards I'm aware of do NOT have the right to impose a Special Assessment without a vote of the owners.
 

timeos2

Tug Review Crew: Rookie
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
11,183
Reaction score
5
Location
Rochester, NY
Are you certain? Most HOA Boards I'm aware of do NOT have the right to impose a Special Assessment without a vote of the owners.

Abosulutely certain that is the law in Fl. Researched by one of the top condo/timeshare lawfirms who won a tough lawsuit against our developer for our owners.
 

Ken555

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
14,925
Reaction score
6,035
Location
Los Angeles
Resorts Owned
Westin Kierland
Sheraton Desert Oasis
Abosulutely certain that is the law in Fl. Researched by one of the top condo/timeshare lawfirms who won a tough lawsuit against our developer for our owners.

Wow, good to know. Thanks.

I suppose it's typical that Florida allow timeshare developers/HOA's extreme latitude in this area. As we've discussed on this forum in the past, Westin St John can't pass a Special Assessment as not enough owners vote. Perhaps we need a summary listing of what's allowed in each State, to assist owners in researching this topic. It may be a nice addition to this site.
 

damianinpa

Guest
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
56
Reaction score
4
Location
Pennsylvania
I called the Florida Timeshare bureau on Friday. Unfortunately, I was on hold for quite a bit and had to hang up. I'll try again Monday. In the mean time, I emailed them about Vistana and this 'special assessment'. I'll share with everyone the response if I get one. Everyone can look at this site and either email or call them. I think we should keep questioning this until we get a clear cut answer as to the legality of this. Also, I emailed the condo association asking them for proof in the by-laws stating this type of fee can be passed to owners. Nothing back from them yet.
http://www.myfloridalicense.com/dbpr/lsc/index.html
 

timeos2

Tug Review Crew: Rookie
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
11,183
Reaction score
5
Location
Rochester, NY
Wasting time - redirect your efforts to make real change

I called the Florida Timeshare bureau on Friday. Unfortunately, I was on hold for quite a bit and had to hang up. I'll try again Monday. In the mean time, I emailed them about Vistana and this 'special assessment'. I'll share with everyone the response if I get one. Everyone can look at this site and either email or call them. I think we should keep questioning this until we get a clear cut answer as to the legality of this. Also, I emailed the condo association asking them for proof in the by-laws stating this type of fee can be passed to owners. Nothing back from them yet.
http://www.myfloridalicense.com/dbpr/lsc/index.html

Trying to get at the Association/Board/Management by calling this "illegal" is a dead end. As I posted above the Board has an absolute right under Fl law to make this assessment. The real problem is you have an unresponsive Board to the owners. THAT you can change if you rally your owners and make the Board understand who they represent (hint - it shouldn't be the developer!). The timeshare department isn't going to help you do that as all they will be able to tell you, if you get through to them, is the actions the Board took are perfectly legal. You should use your anger and frustration to make changes and seriously make moves to push the Board for changes. Only that type of action with plenty of other owners will actually change things for the better. It can be done but it takes real effort and plenty of time. Go for it if you really want to make your resort better.
 

AwayWeGo

TUG Review Crew: Elite
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
15,819
Reaction score
1,762
Location
McLean (Fairfax County), Virginia, USA.
Resorts Owned
Grandview At Las Vegas

[triennial - points]
Not For The Faint Of Heart.

You should use your anger and frustration to make changes and seriously make moves to push the Board for changes. Only that type of action with plenty of other owners will actually change things for the better. It can be done but it takes real effort and plenty of time. Go for it if you really want to make your resort better.
That sounds like major serious good advice.

Earlier in the year, when I was an (unsuccessful) candidate for the 1 vacant spot on a (non-Westin & non-Sheraton) Florida timeshare HOA-BOD, I got to wondering just how an individual owner could get anywhere with any kind of grassroots campaign based on contact with lots of other owners.

For privacy reasons, I don't think timeshare owner lists are given out. And although there are places on the Internet where fellow owners can post & read messages (e.g., TUG-BBS, Yahoo "Groups," etc.), those reach a low percentage of the other owners at best.

The only idea I could come up with was labor-intensive & apt to be incomplete, assuming that attempting it is even practical in the 1st place.

I figured it's possible to do tedious & time-consuming on-line records searches at the County Registrar's web site for Orange County FL, manually noting the names & addresses of people shown as fellow owners at the timeshare. Of course, the task would mean doing mini-chain-of-title searches to figure out which people are current owners & which are former owners. Plus, it's likely that many of the current owners are no longer at the home addresses shown on the deeds because they've moved during the years since buying their timeshares.

All that effort would generate only a semi-accurate & semi-incomplete list of owners. Reaching out to them would involve either more Internet-based research to find their telephone numbers & E-Mail addresses, or relying on the postal service to deliver snail mail to them, or both.

It is questionable how many owners could be contacted that way, & even more questionable how many would respond at all, much less respond positively to the idea of an owner uprising at some dumb timeshare down in Florida when there are so many other & more important things to worry about closer to home.

So I believe that the deck is stacked against us regular walking-around timeshare owners, not by evil intent or diabolical conspiracy but simply by the nature of the beast. Add in evil intent, etc., at any timeshare where something unsavory actually is involved & it's an even steeper slog for an individual owner or even a group of like-minded owners to get reforms off the ground.

These realizations do not add to my disappointment in getting whomped in the HOA-BOD voting, but they do compound my appreciation for those owner-minded independent timeshare HOA-BODs out there who act solely in the interests of their fellow owners, rather than with an eye mainly to the timeshare company's profit-loss statements.

Constantly sticking up for the interests of the regular deeded timeshare week owners while keeping up productive working relations with the timeshare company and complying with all the various layers of law & regulation at the state & county level is a major serious undertaking, & not for the faint of heart.

Plus, HOA-BOD members don't get paid for their work & don't even receive much in the way of freebies, other than maybe a few extra bars of mini-size Timeshare Soap to take home, if even that.

Timeshare owners whose resorts are under the management & control of owner-oriented independent HOA-BODs can count themselves as extremely fortunate -- all the more so if their independent HOA-BODs are made up of capable & talented & dedicated men & women seeing to it that every dollar owed is collected (so that our annual fees aren't jacked up because of other people's unpaid bills) & taking care likewise to see that every dollar spent returns value to the regular walking-around timeshare owners.

-- Alan Cole, McLean (Fairfax County), Virginia, USA.​


 
Last edited:

Joshadelic

TUG Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
473
Reaction score
8
Location
Overland Park, KS
I think everyone is forgetting, too, that they are collecting your regular MF's while also collecting this "special assesment". For an example, a 2br in the Cascades section would have cost $1572 (I think) for the assesment and on top of that your regular MF's are around $958. That is $2530 per week or $131,560 per 2br unit. Even more outrageous, huh?

Why are they charging MF's when there is nothing to M for your F. If the units are being completely refurbished, then there is nobody occupying them - therefore they don't require any routine M...right?
 
Last edited:

Ken555

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
14,925
Reaction score
6,035
Location
Los Angeles
Resorts Owned
Westin Kierland
Sheraton Desert Oasis
Why are they charging MF's when there is nothing to M for your F. If the units are being completely refurbished, then there is nobody occupying them - therefore they don't require any routine M...right?

The grounds still need to be maintained, as well as any other common space or equipment, staff needs to be paid, etc. Why do you think they wouldn't have these expenses during an upgrade? It's time to be reasonable here...
 

Joshadelic

TUG Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
473
Reaction score
8
Location
Overland Park, KS
Maybe some of the expenses, but who is using toilet paper, paper towels, linens, soap, etc. in the units if they aren't being occupied...what about water for showers, laundry and dishes. They don't need housekeepers to come in weekly and make the beds...it's not like the construction guys vacationing there.

My point is that it seems to me that they should have diverted some of the regular MF's to this "special" assesment. It just amazes me that Starwood is too cowardly to actually show everyone a breakdown of where all of this money is going. If I owned there, I would be greatly upset!
 

Ken555

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
14,925
Reaction score
6,035
Location
Los Angeles
Resorts Owned
Westin Kierland
Sheraton Desert Oasis
Maybe some of the expenses, but who is using toilet paper, paper towels, linens, soap, etc. in the units if they aren't being occupied...what about water for showers, laundry and dishes. They don't need housekeepers to come in weekly and make the beds...it's not like the construction guys vacationing there.

I assume some of this is taken into account by SVN. And if there is extra, then the Board has a fiduciary duty to use the income wisely - in other words, perhaps excess would be put into a reserve fund.

My point is that it seems to me that they should have diverted some of the regular MF's to this "special" assesment. It just amazes me that Starwood is too cowardly to actually show everyone a breakdown of where all of this money is going. If I owned there, I would be greatly upset!

Well, people ARE "greatly upset". Some of the MFs are undoubtedly being spent toward upgrades, at least as much as has been put into the reserve fund.
 

damianinpa

Guest
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
56
Reaction score
4
Location
Pennsylvania
I got this back from a regulation specialist...(Warning..it is long). Does anyone make anything of this???

Thank you for your e-mail to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. On behalf of the department, the Customer Contact Center appreciates the opportunity to assist you.

Timeshares in Florida are governed by the requirements of Chapter 721, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and the timeshare administrative rules. The department's Division of Condominiums, Timeshares and Mobile Homes regulates the creation, operation, sale and marketing of Florida timeshare plans pursuant to Chapter 721, F.S., also known as the "Florida Vacation Plan and Timesharing Act." Please be aware that the department cannot render legal advice or give opinions; however, the Customer Contact Center can guide customers to those portions of the statute relevant to their queries.

721.15 Assessments for common expenses.--
(1)(a) Until a managing entity is created or provided pursuant to s. 721.13, the developer shall pay all common expenses. The timeshare instrument shall provide for the allocation of common expenses among all timeshare units or timeshare interests on a reasonable basis, including timeshare interests owned or not yet sold by the developer. The timeshare instrument may provide that the common expenses allocated may differ between those timeshare units that are part of the timeshare plan and those units that are not part of the timeshare plan; however, the different proportion of expenses must be based upon reasonable differences in the benefit provided to each. The timeshare instrument shall allocate common expenses to timeshare interests owned or not yet sold by the developer on the same basis that common expenses are allocated to similar or equivalent timeshare interests sold to purchasers.

(b) Notwithstanding any provision of chapter 718 or chapter 719 to the contrary, the allocation of total common expenses for a condominium or a cooperative timeshare plan may vary on any reasonable basis, including, but not limited to, timeshare unit size, timeshare unit type, timeshare unit location, specific identification, or a combination of these factors, if the percentage interest in the common elements attributable to each timeshare condominium parcel or timeshare cooperative parcel equals the share of the total common expenses allocable to that parcel. The share of a timeshare interest in the common expenses allocable to the timeshare condominium parcel or the timeshare cooperative parcel containing such interest may vary on any reasonable basis if the timeshare interest's share of its parcel's common expense allocation is equal to that timeshare interest's share of the percentage interest in common elements attributable to such parcel.

(2)(a) After the creation or provision of a managing entity, the managing entity shall make an annual assessment against each purchaser for the payment of common expenses, based on the projected annual budget, in the amount specified by the contract between the seller and the purchaser or in the timeshare instrument.

(b) No owner of a timeshare interest may be excused from the payment of her or his share of the common expenses unless all owners are likewise excused from payment, except that the developer may be excused from the payment of her or his share of the common expenses which would have been assessed against her or his timeshare interests during a stated period of time during which the developer has guaranteed to each purchaser in the timeshare instrument, or by agreement between the developer and a majority of the owners of timeshare interests other than the developer, that the assessment for common expenses imposed upon the owners would not increase over a stated dollar amount. In the event of such a guarantee, the developer is obligated to pay all common expenses incurred during the guarantee period in excess of the total revenues of the timeshare plan. Notwithstanding this limitation, if a developer-controlled owners' association has maintained all insurance coverages required by s. 721.165, the common expenses incurred during the guarantee period resulting from a natural disaster or an act of God, which are not covered by insurance proceeds from the insurance maintained by the owners' association, may be assessed against all purchasers owning timeshare interests on the date of such natural disaster or act of God, and their successors and assigns, including the developer with respect to timeshare interests owned by the developer. In the event of such an assessment, all timeshare interests shall be assessed in accordance with their ownership interest as required by paragraph (1)(a).

(c) For the purpose of calculating the obligation of a developer under a guarantee pursuant to paragraph (b), depreciation expenses related to real property shall be excluded from common expenses incurred during the guarantee period, except that for real property that is used for the production of fees, revenues, or other income, depreciation expenses shall be excluded only to the extent that they exceed the net income from the production of such fees, revenues, or other income.

(d) A guarantee pursuant to paragraph (b) may provide that the developer may extend or increase the guarantee for one or more additional stated periods.

(3) Delinquent assessments may bear interest at the highest rate permitted by law or at some lesser rate established by the managing entity. In addition to such interest, the managing entity may charge an administrative late fee in an amount not to exceed $25 for each delinquent assessment. Any costs of collection, including reasonable collection agency fees and reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in the collection of a delinquent assessment shall be paid by the purchaser and shall be secured by a lien in favor of the managing entity upon the timeshare interest with respect to which the delinquent assessment has been incurred; however, in the event that a managing entity turns the matter over to a collection agency, the managing entity must advise the purchaser at least 60 days prior to turning the matter over to the collection agency that the purchaser may be liable for the fees of the collection agency and that a lien may result therefrom.

(4) Unless otherwise specified in the contract between the seller and the purchaser, any common expenses benefiting fewer than all purchasers shall be assessed only against those purchasers benefited.

(5) Any assessments for common expenses which have not been spent for common expenses during the year for which such assessments were made shall be shown as an item on the annual budget.

(6) Notwithstanding any contrary requirements of s. 718.112(2)(g) or s. 719.106(1)(g), for timeshare plans subject to this chapter, assessments against purchasers need not be made more frequently than annually.

(7) A purchaser, regardless of how her or his timeshare estate or timeshare license has been acquired, including a purchaser at a judicial sale, is personally liable for all assessments for common expenses which come due while the purchaser is the owner of such interest. A successor in interest is jointly and severally liable with her or his predecessor in interest for all unpaid assessments against such predecessor up to the time of transfer of the timeshare interest to such successor without prejudice to any right a successor in interest may have to recover from her or his predecessor in interest any amounts assessed against such predecessor and paid by such successor. The predecessor in interest shall provide the managing entity with a copy of the recorded deed of conveyance if the interest is a timeshare estate or a copy of the instrument of transfer if the interest is a timeshare license, containing the name and mailing address of the successor in interest within 15 days after the date of transfer. The managing entity shall not be liable to any person for any inaccuracy in the books and records of the timeshare plan arising from the failure of the predecessor in interest to timely and correctly notify the managing entity of the name and mailing address of the successor in interest.

(8) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (7), a first mortgagee or its successor or assignee who acquires title to a timeshare interest as a result of the foreclosure of the mortgage or by deed in lieu of foreclosure of the mortgage shall be exempt from liability for all unpaid assessments attributable to the timeshare interest or chargeable to the previous owner which came due prior to acquisition of title by the first mortgagee.

(9)(a) Anything contained in chapter 718 or chapter 719 to the contrary notwithstanding, the managing entity of a timeshare plan shall not commingle operating funds with reserve funds; however, the managing entity may maintain operating and reserve funds within a single account for a period not to exceed 30 days after the date on which the managing entity received payment of such funds.

(b) Anything contained in chapter 718 or chapter 719 to the contrary notwithstanding, a managing entity which serves as managing entity of more than one timeshare plan, or of more than one component site pursuant to part II, shall not commingle the common expense funds of any one timeshare plan or component site with the common expense funds of any other timeshare plan or component site. However, the managing entity may maintain common expense funds of multiple timeshare plans or multiple component sites within a single account for a period not to exceed 30 days after the date on which the managing entity received payment of such funds.

(10) This section shall not apply to personal property timeshare plans.

721.16 Liens for overdue assessments; liens for labor performed on, or materials furnished to, a timeshare unit.--

(1) The managing entity has a lien on a timeshare interest for any assessment levied against that timeshare interest from the date such assessment becomes due. The managing entity also has a lien on a timeshare interest of any purchaser for the cost of any maintenance, repairs, or replacement resulting from an act of such purchaser or purchaser's guest that results in damage to the timeshare property or facilities made available to the purchasers.

(2) The managing entity may bring an action in its name to foreclose a lien under subsection (1) in the manner a mortgage of real property is foreclosed and may also bring an action to recover a money judgment for the unpaid assessments without waiving any claim of lien.

(3) The lien is effective from the date of recording a claim of lien in the public records of the county or counties in which the accommodations and facilities constituting the timeshare plan are located. The claim of lien shall state the name of the timeshare plan and identify the timeshare interest for which the lien is effective, state the name of the purchaser, state the assessment amount due, and state the due dates. Notwithstanding any provision of s. 718.116(5)(a) or s. 719.108(4) to the contrary, the lien is effective until satisfied or until 5 years have expired after the date the claim of lien is recorded unless, within that time, an action to enforce the lien is commenced pursuant to subsection (2). A claim of lien for assessments may include only assessments which are due when the claim is recorded. A claim of lien shall be signed and acknowledged by an officer or agent of the managing entity. Upon full payment, the person making the payment is entitled to receive a satisfaction of the lien.

(4) A judgment in any action or suit brought under this section shall include costs and reasonable attorney's fees for the prevailing party.

(5) Labor performed on a timeshare unit, or materials furnished to a timeshare unit, shall not be the basis for the filing of a lien pursuant to part I of chapter 713, the Construction Lien Law, against the timeshare unit of any timeshare-period owner not expressly consenting to or requesting the labor or materials.

(6) This section shall not apply to personal property timeshare plans.

Again, thank you again for writing. You may view the Florida Vacation Plan and Timesharing Act, the timeshare administrative rules, and other educational material on-line at: http://www.myflorida.com/dbpr/lsc/timeshare.html. f you have any additional questions or concerns, please contact the department's Customer Contact Center by calling (850) 488-1122.

Sincerely,

Sarah M. Sanders
Regulatory Specialist III
Customer Contact Center
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
 
Top