Monykalyn
TUG Member
Yeah our plan was "developed" with everyone other than teachers-including some who may be financially benefiting from the arrangement. What's really frustrating is all the surrounding districts are 5 seated days a week. Football is going on, but all marching band competitions cancelled. And for those who are seated 5 days a week if quarantine at home is needed then the teacher is required to do the online teaching for them as well.Actually the majority of our parents (60+%) also wanted full-time in school, but we’re willing to settle with hybrid, so at least we’d have some in school time, but the district and teachers union insisted on full remote (even though 2/3 of the teachers were willing to go back to the classroom. ). They even cut the school day by 2.5 hours. So, in the end they picked the option that only satisfied 10-15% of the families, and it’s not working well.
Would it not have made more sense for a dedicated set of teachers who do online only? And those who desired to be in the classroom allowed to be there? My street has 5 teachers in about 10 houses-not a single one is happy with the plan. Our district is looking for a whole heck of a lot of "sub" teachers-state only requires 20 hours training to become a sub; hub is considering it as his business is hugely impacted.
Wow! And for iffy service. Wish those who want to brush off virtual learning as "easy" or the "only option" actually considered the ramifications for at risk families.We are paying $155 per month to have the two services.
Remember reading something about how wastewater could be used to identify community outbreaks or potential outbreaks/hot spots before they got out of control pretty early on. Pretty cool to see it in practice!!THIS kind of monitoring is what it will take to really mitigate/ control the spread of the virus in lieu of a vaccine.