In one recent post I asked if trustee X was ever a "single owner" and after it was posted, I realized it could be misconstrued, so I pressed the 'edit' button and changed it to "single-week owner," which better describes the meaning I intended to convey (my imaginary legal team was unavailable to advise me on this one).
I vaguely recall a moderator asking why the need to edit-- replying honestly and the edit was made. All of us have the opportunity to edit, repair, delete our own messages. Look for the edit button. Others have the right to copy and archive original versions. It's not a conspiracy.
No one here has a problem with you editing your own post within TUG's allowed timeframe. The problem comes when you want to edit my post containing your quote. If you need to consult an attorney about whether you should say something in your post or not, ask for the legal advice before you post it. Once you post it and someone copies your quote within their post, it is no longer yours to change.
I have no problem with trustee x trying to make a profit, that is what businesses that survive do. However if your trustee x is going to make other people improve his property with their money while not contributing any money himself towards improvements and upgrades, that is a problem. I wish I could buy part of a house to flip, make the other owners of the house pay 100% of the renovation costs, and then sell my portion for more money without having to contribute my share of the expenses to improve the value of the property. In addition as long as I own a portion of the house to sell, the other owners will pay 100% of the electricity, taxes, insurance, upkeep, and incidentals for not only their portion of the property, but they will pay my share too. If it take me a year or 20 years to sell, the other owners will always have to cover my share of the expenses while I pay nothing. When I sell the people that covered my expense for all of those years are not entitled to one penny of the proceeds from my sale. That is exactly what trustee x is doing and it isn't right. He should pay the same amount for each week he owns as owners pay because after all he is an OWNER of 500 weeks. If you own 10 weeks you have to pay assessments and annual MF's on each and every week. So should he.
Trustee x has placed himself and 2 others as trustees with no votes or input from the owners. He has assessed with no vote or input. He has raised MF's with no vote or input. If you read his comments about other resorts he has controlled, one (I thing Brewster Green) had 3 or 4 separate assessments in the span of a few years. Southscape owners might have just paid the first of many assessments that he will charge to get the resort renovated to a level that will allow him to sell his weeks for a premium price. If you don't mind being repeatedly assessed and paying ever increasing MF's with no vote or input (since he controls the mgt company and the trustees), then this might be a good deal for you. I personally would hate it. I like to have a vote in resorts I own. I like the board to be composed of owners, not developers. I want the board's main goal to be taking care of the owners, not maximizing sales profit for themselves.
If he is going to sell this resort as festiva, announce it in a newsletter. Extoll the virtues of Festiva and proudly proclaim the reasons he chose Festiva to associate with and why he chose outfield to sell festiva to owners. He dodges the issue and acts like he has nothing to do with Festiva or Outfield. We aren't stupid. He hired outfield because he owns the weeks and controls the board/trustees. Who else could have hired them? He had to have known that Outfield sold festiva exclusivelly when he hired Outfield. To act like he had nothing to do with it is an outright lie IMO.
Festiva is IMO a horrible organization with regards to the way they treat owners. They, like trustee x, take control and do what they want with no input from the owners. They renovate and upgrade so that they can charge more for their weeks they sell. They make owners mad and get many free "prime" weeks for them to sell that owners deed back to them once the assessments and MF's become ridiculous. Trustee x and Festiva can't be gotten rid of because they control the vote, the board, and the mgt companies. They are both like herpes IMO because you don't want it, you aren't quite sure how you got it, and you can't get rid of it.