COVID-19 'has NO credible natural ancestor' and WAS created by Chinese scientists who then tried to cover their tracks with 'retro-engineering'

[bluehende]

A scientific paper by nature is not political but this one uses names of US politicians and the word "conspiracy" 26 times. I guess you found what you were looking for. Scientific... not. I will not quote any of the political stuff mentioned by the Indonesian author. Just for you to understand how ridiculous his arguments are:

"It is highly unlikely that SARS-CoV-2 was accidentally released from a laboratory since no direct ancestral virus is identified in the current database. ". He is referring to the database of the Wuhan lab .

So if the Chinese were working on the manipulation of the virus to make it highly transmissible to humans they were going to post it ALL online. If HE can't see it, it means it does not exist. WOW, his logic is flawless! We already know that being true and Peter Daszak has already admitted when he talked about what his "colleagues in China" where doing. Maybe Mohamad S Hakim is the last person to find that out.

Fauci-Funded Daszak Describes 'Colleagues In China' Manipulating Viruses Into 'Killers'

Fauci-Funded Peter Daszak Describes His 'Colleagues In China' Manipulating Viruses Into 'Killers' In Unseen Video.

rumble.com

Says the guy that posts non papers from fox , qanon sites, and british tabloids.

 

[Brett]

The thing I find interesting about this thread, whether the intend it or not, is the frequent posters seem to be cheering for one side or the other. Either they hope is came from animals or there are other wanting to have been released from the lab. Shouldn't we all just be interested in finding out the truth of what really happened? Unfortunately, truth seems to have taken a back seat to political stances in todays world.

The "cheering" is not about the "truth"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...69f022-c55b-11eb-9a8d-f95d7724967c_story.html

"One would have to come to the firm conclusion that not only was the virus developed in a lab — something experts have said is nearly impossible given the virus’s features — but that Americans helped cover it up and that President Biden is now aiding in the effort.

But more significantly, the focus on where the virus came from appears to be an attempt to distract from the chief failure of the Trump administration — its uneven and chaotic response to the outbreak once it began spreading within the United States.

“They’re using Dr. Fauci as a way to direct attention from what actually was a massive government failure from the White House and individuals Donald Trump put in place to handle some of this pandemic,” Adalja said.

The central argument from Trump and his allies is that the possibility that the virus escaped from a lab in Wuhan or was manufactured there — a claim for which there is no public evidence — as opposed to spreading from an animal to a human, was unfairly dismissed or covered up by scientists and media organizations bent on destroying the former president.

 

[Yellowfin]

Says the guy that posts non papers from fox , qanon sites, and british tabloids.

If you can't read or at least watch videos that show that you are wrong it is your problem. Many of your comments are political, full of conspiracies and innuendo. Because you did not like the content of an article you say I post qanon sites? Wow, that is rich. I am surprised you have not been banned (yet) for clear and repeated violations of the rules.

 

[Yellowfin]

Covid-19: Did the pandemic start in a Wuhan lab? - BBC Newsnight

 

[Ken555]

If you can't read or at least watch videos that show that you are wrong it is your problem. Many of your comments are political, full of conspiracies and innuendo. Because you did not like the content of an article you say I post qanon sites? Wow, that is rich. I am surprised you have not been banned (yet) for clear and repeated violations of the rules.

On almost any controversial topic there will be “videos” and other sources representing all perspectives. The issue here is the challenge many of us have of finding sources that are primarily based on objective scientific reporting. Sadly, many of the sources you have posted do not qualify for that designation.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Yellowfin]

On almost any controversial topic there will be “videos” and other sources representing all perspectives. The issue here is the challenge many of us have of finding sources that are primarily based on objective scientific reporting. Sadly, many of the sources you have posted do not qualify for that designation.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

So Nicolas Wade is not an objective scientific reporting? But Peter Daszak (who funded the lab with Dr Fauci) is? Please clarify.

 

["Roger"]

Leading biologist dampens his ‘smoking gun’ Covid lab leak theory

Nobel laureate David Baltimore says he overstated case, and the origins of the virus are still unknown

www.theguardian.com

 

[Yellowfin]

Leading biologist dampens his ‘smoking gun’ Covid lab leak theory

Nobel laureate David Baltimore says he overstated case, and the origins of the virus are still unknown

www.theguardian.com

So not exactly a smoking gun but he is not backing the natural theory either.

 

["Roger"]

So not exactly a smoking gun but he is not backing the natural theory either.

That's the way I read it.

 

[DeniseM]

Multiple reported posts - I think we are done here.