It just occurred to me (I'm clearly a little slow) that one big effect, undoubtedly intentional, of the movement away from deeded weeks, is that I assume that all of those weeks in the various trusts mean that MVW gets to vote those ownerships as it wishes. In other words, "owners" of Flex points or other points-based products are not actually legal owners of the underlying real estate, and so if something comes up in any of the HOAs requiring a vote of the owners, MVW gets to vote for all of those weeks in the trusts.
This means that MVW will never have to worry about owners rebelling and deciding to pull out of their network, because the majority of owners are actually "owners" (with quotes) who have no voting rights. Am I right about that?
I'm thinking of the Vistana property that pulled out a few years ago – Villas at Cave Creek I think it was. That was kind of an unusual situation, but if MVC had sold their properties out as deeded weeks, it would have conceivably been possible that could happen again at another resort. Now it is precluded because they control such a big chunk of the votes and will do so in perpetuity even if they were to sell out all the available points.
Sorry, this is marginally off-topic. Occurred to me while reading this thread.