The 28 and 32 numbers have been thrown around quite a bit, so I guess what I question, not being super familiar with Marriott points-based timeshares (I used to own a non enrolled week), is are those values realistic for a Marriott equivalent unit? And if they are, would the FLEX really be the only product allowed to access MVC, or is it just that the product would be the only one auto -enrolled while the rest of us unwashed Starwooders have to pay to play? If I have to pay 6 separate enrollment fees, one per unit, regardless of status of resale or retail, that would probably NOT be ok with me, and I would probably downsize some of these, and lose my 4 star elite status. I have been holding on to some of these for a long time waiting to see what Marriott is going to do. If I only had to pay one "kind of high" enrollment fee for my resale to legitimize it, i would be ok with that, too. If I had to pay one modest fee, for all 6, I would do that.
For me as a personal example: I was told the Westin and Harborside would be the 28 ratio, while Sheratons would be the 32, at the presentation i went to, so:
WSJ #1 - 125,000 SO = 4464 MVC Points @ 28:1
WSJ #2 - 125,000 SO = 4464 MVC Points @ 28:1 EVEN 2232 annualized
HRA - 148,100 SO = 5289 MVC Points @ 28:1 (hopefully)
SVV - 81,000 SO = 2531 MVC Points @ 32:1 EVEN 1265 annualized (although this is a resale right now and not qualified)
SVR #1 81,000 SO = 2531 MVC Points @ 32:1 EVEN 1265 annualized
SVR #2 81,000 SO = 2531 MVC Points @ 32:1 EVEN 1265 annualized
So brings me to roughly 14,500 qualified MVC points a year (if we assume resales are out of the picture), rounded down. So that puts me where on the Marriott status level? Given my husband's illness, I would love to be able to make full use of the MVC system, then I could rent the points and hopefully offset most if not all my Maintenance fees. I don't want to let go of all of these just yet, until the dust settles on my husband's illness - which they have said he may live only a few more years, and quite frankly, I don't know what my life will be like 1, 5 or 10 years down the road, but I know I won't be traveling at all really in the short term. But 10 years from now, who knows, I may be remarried, and want to travel again, so I would like to keep my options open. Whatever Marriott is going to do, I wish they would just get it over with already and tell us. This multiple years of suspense is total BS.