M&MsDad2008
TUG Member
Even if they were able to procure ROFR Maui OF inventory, they would still be bound by the overall agreement at 12 months out. MVC would be like any other purchaser, and they could not have an extended reservation time period.Wouldn’t Marriott just be able to exercise ROFR on this inventory to get it into the trust at half price or less? If they do not exercise ROFR on Maui OF inventory, then I will assume they own a bunch already and it was not sold out.
I hate to say this and once again it will be controversial…but Tuggers sound like they think they are smarter than a corporation employed by experts. I am not talking about the lowly employees at the sales offices but the highly paid marketing and finance experts. I used to work for the corporate office of a travel corporation and believe me, they knew what they were doing.
If MVC was able to do that, there would be less inventory for an owner at WKORV or WKORVN to secure a reservation for an OF at 12 months out for their selected week That most likely would be in violation when Starwood first sold the timeshares, starting in the early 2000s. This would expose MVC to liability to a class action for all owners of those properties.
If MVC follows the advice of their lawyers, they will not provide the 13 month window at WKORV or WKORVN.