WaikikiFirst
Guest
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2023
- Messages
- 1,481
- Reaction score
- 726
good qstn. after posting that I realized I maybe should mention I was looking at a WEEKLY chart, not a daily. I tend to use RSI(9) on wkly charts, but this is all in the weeds. Doesn't matter. I quoted the relative RSIs only to point out how the stock with weaker PUBLICLY AVAILABLE company fundamentals has, only AFTER they both REPORTED, now performed about 20% worse in the last couple of months. But, despite the weaker company fundamentals being PUBLICLY AVAILABLE, the disparity opened only AFTER they REPORTED it themselves. So much of "efficiency" on PUBLICLY AVAILABLE info.What Length RSI are you using for your RSI Levels
None of the above. I just quoted it as it stood yesterday. I did not enter the "pairs-trade" based on technical analysis. I did it based on the disparity in PUBLICLY AVAILABLE company fundamentals. Of course, if TPH had alread crashed by 20% below GRBK, then I would have said "Hey, Mr Market gets it." In that case, I would not have entered the "pair-trade". Likewise, as soon as GRBK announced and the 20% gap was there, I closed both positions yesterday AM.Are you using this length in conjunction with back tested oversold and overbought readings
"efficiency" based on PUBLICLY AVAILABLE info? LMAO. Mr Market fully absorbs PUBLICLY AVAILABLE info only when it has been admitted and discussed by the CEO &/or CFO. Not until. in addition to all his other psychoses, Mr Market is generally a donkey being led around by the nose by the CEOs & CFOs.
Last edited: