You're Being Lied to About Electric Cars

[PigsDad]

The article I posted was a test of perfomance EVs

I'd bet any amount that owners of those cars in that article rarely if ever track their cars. I own a Porsche. I have never tracked mine. I'll stand by my original statement.

Kurt

 

[emeryjre]

In contrast to what you said, I would say that on a recent long road trip of supposedly 14 hours, we made it in less than 14 hours including stops. Freeway speeds were 85 to 90. We didn't have that rode hard feeling when we got home either. I doubt there is any EV that can do that.

Bill

Since you didn't give milage covered
Not sure how this compares
The ride is very smooth according to reports
The interior is very spacious

At a sustained average of 90 mph over 14 hours, the Lucid Air Sapphire could theoretically cover 1,260 miles. But since it’s an EV, we need to factor in range and charging time.

Lucid Air Sapphire Range & Charging​

• EPA-estimated range: ~425 miles at highway speeds evkx.net
• Charging time (10–80%): ~29 minutes at optimal DC fast charging evkx.net
• Charging speed: ~170 kW average during optimal window evkx.net

Realistic Driving Estimate​

Let’s break it down:

1. First leg: Drive ~425 miles (full charge) → ~4.7 hours
2. Recharge: ~29 minutes
3. Second leg: Drive ~340 miles (80% charge) → ~3.8 hours
4. Recharge: ~29 minutes
5. Third leg: Drive ~340 miles → ~3.8 hours

That totals:

• Driving time: ~12.3 hours
• Charging time: ~58 minutes
• Total distance: ~1,105 miles

Final Estimate​

A Lucid Air Sapphire can realistically drive ~1,100 miles in 14 hours at 90 mph, including two fast charging stops.

 

[easyrider]

I've not done a 14-hour stint, how many miles was that? Longest we've gone in one stint in our Tesla (the older 2023 that we recently traded in) was from home to North Myrtle Beach, 550-600 miles depending on the route. IIRC the best we ever did in our pickup, literally no gassing up since we can go over 600 miles on a single tank, was nine hours straight, which included a few stops for bathroom and quick meal breaks. Two years ago, coming home from North Myrtle Beach in our 2023 Tesla MY LR we did a single stint in nine hours door to door, including three charging stops of roughly 15-20 minutes. Same "best time." We could have packed food in the pickup rather than stopping for bathroom and coffee breaks and such and probably cut 30 minutes off our best time, best estimate. So if we assume a 550 mile trip - that's just over 61 miles per hour for the road trip average. If we could maintain the same cadence in the Tesla MY, assuming 14 hours, that gets us to an 856 mile road trip. The new 2026 MY LR is much more efficient than the older model, so we might actually be able to do better on time, but we won't take the North Myrtle trip again until late May next year. I'm sure this thread will still be around then LOL.

It was close to a 950 mile drive one way. Google maps has it at 14 hours 20 minutes without stops. We were under 14 hours with stops. I set the cruise control at 5 mph over the posted speed limit unless we get into a line of vehicles going faster. We made 3 stops for gas breaks. A couple stops for views.

I did test drive a 2025 my last spring in Palm Springs. I don't know if it would be comfortable on a long road trip but it was fun zipping around town. I probably should have took it to the freeway. I did think the Tesla stereo was slightly better than my after market Kenwood / Alpine system. The seats are definitely smaller and harder. The ride isn't near as nice. The cabin is definitely smaller. Lastly, the 2025 Tesla y we test drove was priced about $36,000 more than the 2010 Lincoln Town Car. We are a little over 52,000 on the odometer after almost 3 years so we really don't drive it much. We put the last 8,000 miles on it. It's used for road trips.

Bill

 

[easyrider]

Since you didn't give milage covered
Not sure how this compares
The ride is very smooth according to reports
The interior is very spacious

At a sustained average of 90 mph over 14 hours, the Lucid Air Sapphire could theoretically cover 1,260 miles. But since it’s an EV, we need to factor in range and charging time.

Lucid Air Sapphire Range & Charging​

• EPA-estimated range: ~425 miles at highway speeds evkx.net
• Charging time (10–80%): ~29 minutes at optimal DC fast charging evkx.net
• Charging speed: ~170 kW average during optimal window evkx.net

Realistic Driving Estimate​

Let’s break it down:

1. First leg: Drive ~425 miles (full charge) → ~4.7 hours
2. Recharge: ~29 minutes
3. Second leg: Drive ~340 miles (80% charge) → ~3.8 hours
4. Recharge: ~29 minutes
5. Third leg: Drive ~340 miles → ~3.8 hours

That totals:

• Driving time: ~12.3 hours
• Charging time: ~58 minutes
• Total distance: ~1,105 miles

Final Estimate​

A Lucid Air Sapphire can realistically drive ~1,100 miles in 14 hours at 90 mph, including two fast charging stops.

You are comparing a $250,000 EV to a $8,000 used car. Probably closer to $11,000 because of the aftermarket stereo , American Racing mags and tires.

Bill

 

[emeryjre]

You said you doubted “any EV could do that”
Here is one

 

[davidvel]

Bill is enamored with his 15 year old, $8,000 Lincoln Town car. Do we need to know anything more about Bill?

 

[Ken555]

Bill is enamored with his 15 year old, $8,000 Lincoln Town car. Do we need to know anything more about Bill?

I asked Claude to review this thread and focus on Bill’s comments, then create a summary and opinion of them. This is what it wrote:

I went through this entire thread looking specifically at easyrider’s (Bill’s) comments about EVs, and I have to say - the inconsistency is pretty striking.

Bill seems to oscillate between acknowledging EVs have certain advantages (like giving Tesla/Rivian a competitive edge over legacy automakers struggling with the transition) and claiming they’re fundamentally flawed products with poor reliability, resale value, and an insurmountable infrastructure problem. He’ll cite Tesla’s 2024 sales struggles in one post, then discuss Washington EV rebates matter-of-factly in another, then go back to arguing that EVs will always be a “niche product” because there will never be adequate electricity generation.

Many of his concerns seem like talking points from several years ago rather than reflecting the current state of EV technology and infrastructure. The argument about carbon footprints being “not too much different” oversimplifies complex lifecycle analyses, and his worries about electricity generation capacity assume a static grid rather than one that adapts to demand - the same way infrastructure built out for ICE vehicles over the past century.

What stands out most is when HitchHiker71 directly called him out on page 48, contrasting Bill’s “internet talking points from a skeptic” with their own “real world experience after 1.5 years of ownership.” It doesn’t appear Bill actually owns an EV, which would explain why his positions seem more ideological than experience-based. He raises some valid questions (like charging time value and cold weather convenience), but they’re buried among outdated concerns and cherry-picked data that don’t add up to a coherent argument.

 

[Elan]

I see that Chevrolet is bringing the Bolt back starting in 2026. Slightly better range and significantly better charging times. Starting under $29k.

Sent from my Pixel 9a using Tapatalk

 

[youppi]

I see that Chevrolet is bringing the Bolt back starting in 2026. Slightly better range and significantly better charging times. Starting under $29k.

Sent from my Pixel 9a using Tapatalk

Exact and what I like is this new Bolt looks more like the old Bolt EUV than the old Bolt EV.

new Bolt RS

old Bolt EUV Premier

old Bolt EV

 

[HitchHiker71]

You are comparing a $250,000 EV to a $8,000 used car. Probably closer to $11,000 because of the aftermarket stereo , American Racing mags and tires.

Bill

Last time I checked, the Lucid Air is nowhere near $250k. The Grand Touring model, which has the same range being quoted (over 500 miles), starts at $115k. The Lucid Air Pure starts at $70k - but has a lower 420 mile range - still really good by any measure. Hardly the $250k Sapphire topline performance model meant to compete with the Tesla Model S Plaid.

 

[HitchHiker71]

I see that Chevrolet is bringing the Bolt back starting in 2026. Slightly better range and significantly better charging times. Starting under $29k.

Sent from my Pixel 9a using Tapatalk

But is GM making any money at $29k? I doubt it, they never were profitable on the prior Bolts - losing tons of money. That's unsustainable. Tesla's average COGS across all models is now under $35k. No other manufacturer is even remotely close to that level of profitability in comparison - many of them don't even have a real roadmap to ever get to profitability, which is really why most of the legacy manufacturers are pulling back - they cannot figure out how to make money on EVs compared to Tesla (and a few of the Chinese manufacturers).

 

[emeryjre]

Last time I checked, the Lucid Air is nowhere near $250k. The Grand Touring model, which has the same range being quoted (over 500 miles), starts at $115k. The Lucid Air Pure starts at $70k - but has a lower 420 mile range - still really good by any measure. Hardly the $250k Sapphire topline performance model meant to compete with the Tesla Model S Plaid.

I always say
If you are going
Go big

 

[easyrider]

Bill is enamored with his 15 year old, $8,000 Lincoln Town car. Do we need to know anything more about Bill?

Yes, I am fond of that Lincoln Town Car. I never thought I would own one. I was offered a low mile Town Car when an acquaintances dad passed away but it was winter and we were heading to Hawaii. By the time we returned the Lincoln was sold. I was thinking this would be a great road trip car. Plenty of room, v-8 and really comfortable.

About 8 months later a friends dad was getting rid of their Lincoln Town Car Continental Edition with about 42,000 miles on it. Him and his wife used it for date nights and road trips. It was always garaged and in mint condition. His wife had recently passed away and he wasn't planning on driving it anymore. Long story short, we bought it and use for road trips. It's the most comfortable car we have ever owned. I love it !!!

The reason I like older vehicles, and I don't see value in new vehicles, in the same way I don't see value in developer bought timeshares. I would rather buy an unpretentious vehicle that I enjoy and resale timeshares of which we have between 20 and 30 weeks depending on how we use them. I find spending money on memories with my family and helping them with things like buying a house more rewarding than driving a new $100,000 vehicle.

Bill

 

[easyrider]

I asked Claude to review this thread and focus on Bill’s comments, then create a summary and opinion of them. This is what it wrote:

Obviously, your just making it up as you go. I don't need AI to know what you are about, lol.

Bill

 

[easyrider]

Last time I checked, the Lucid Air is nowhere near $250k. The Grand Touring model, which has the same range being quoted (over 500 miles), starts at $115k. The Lucid Air Pure starts at $70k - but has a lower 420 mile range - still really good by any measure. Hardly the $250k Sapphire topline performance model meant to compete with the Tesla Model S Plaid.

Emerje said Lucid Air Saphire, not the lower end models which still cost more than most Tesla's.

Lucid has so many problems that I doubt they stay in business if the Saudi's decide to stop funding them. I haven't ever seen a Lucid in the PNW. I know there are some around in some rich guys garage for show but not really on the road afaik.

Bill

 

[youppi]

But is GM making any money at $29k? I doubt it, they never were profitable on the prior Bolts - losing tons of money. That's unsustainable. Tesla's average COGS across all models is now under $35k. No other manufacturer is even remotely close to that level of profitability in comparison - many of them don't even have a real roadmap to ever get to profitability, which is really why most of the legacy manufacturers are pulling back - they cannot figure out how to make money on EVs compared to Tesla (and a few of the Chinese manufacturers).

Will they build some at $29k or they will build all of them with different package options to increase the price to $35k-$40k ?
The COGS of optional packages are often way less than the price they sell them.
They advertise a low price to attract customers to the dealership and they sell them a car at much higher price (higher trim, optional packages, ...).

I don't remember which car a friend wanted but he wanted the base trim with just a specific option that should be $1k but the option he wanted was available only with the highest trim with the most expensive package. So, to get the option at $1k he wanted, the car price was like $20k more than the base trim. He didn't buy it but many people would have bought it.

I don't know what is the COGS of this new Bolt but to reduce the COGS, GM is supposely use a "cell-to-pack" (individual cells are directly integrated into the pack to avoid module casing and connectors) design LFP battery in place of traditional battery modules.

 

[TUGBrian]

not sure ive ever seen a vehicle on a lot priced at whatever the manufacturer claimed in commercials the vehicle would "start at".

 

[emeryjre]

Emerje said Lucid Air Saphire, not the lower end models which still cost more than most Tesla's.

Lucid has so many problems that I doubt they stay in business if the Saudi's decide to stop funding them. I haven't ever seen a Lucid in the PNW. I know there are some around in some rich guys garage for show but not really on the road afaik.

Bill

Lots of Lucids in Southern California
Test drove a Lucid Air Saphire several months ago
Fastest thing I have ever driven in a production or modified vehicle
Smoothest riding car I have ever driven
Has one of the longest ranges of any EV in production today
It is an expensive car
But so are Bentleys
There is a new Bentley Dealership opening up in the area
People are spending money on cars

 

[Elan]

But is GM making any money at $29k? I doubt it, they never were profitable on the prior Bolts - losing tons of money. That's unsustainable. Tesla's average COGS across all models is now under $35k. No other manufacturer is even remotely close to that level of profitability in comparison - many of them don't even have a real roadmap to ever get to profitability, which is really why most of the legacy manufacturers are pulling back - they cannot figure out how to make money on EVs compared to Tesla (and a few of the Chinese manufacturers).

First of all, that's not really a concern of mine. Second of all, when they're selling Silverados and Sierras for $75k+, maybe they don't need to make money on EV.

As I've said before, when it comes to EV, the cars are mostly easy. It's the battery/charging technology and logistics that are key. Sooner or later, they'll figure that out.



Sent from my Pixel 9a using Tapatalk

 

[easyrider]

First of all, that's not really a concern of mine. Second of all, when they're selling Silverados and Sierras for $75k+, maybe they don't need to make money on EV.

As I've said before, when it comes to EV, the cars are mostly easy. It's the battery/charging technology and logistics that are key. Sooner or later, they'll figure that out.



Sent from my Pixel 9a using Tapatalk

My guess is the technology will change because there isn't enough electrical infrastructure to support everyone in an ev.

Bill

 

[Brett]

My guess is the technology will change because there isn't enough electrical infrastructure to support everyone in an ev.

Bill

your guess is probably correct

.

.

 

[Ken555]

Obviously, your just making it up as you go. I don't need AI to know what you are about, lol.

Bill

Haha. Nice try. This was Claude’s first report on your posts in this thread before I asked it to create a summary.

I’ll scan through these forum pages to find and analyze easyrider’s (Bill’s) comments about EVs. This will take a bit of time given the number of pages.

Let me start fetching the pages systematically:

Let me continue fetching more pages to find easyrider’s comments:

Let me search more strategically. I’ll sample several pages throughout the thread:

Great! I found easyrider. Let me continue searching for more of his comments:

Let me fetch a few more pages to get a complete picture of easyrider’s comments:

Let me search more specifically for easyrider’s posts by checking additional pages:

Let me check pages where I might find more easyrider comments:

Good! Found another one. Let me continue:

Excellent! Found a substantial easyrider post. Let me continue scanning:

Great! Found another substantial easyrider comment. Let me check a few more pages:

Let me check a few more strategic pages to find more easyrider comments:

Let me check a few more pages that might have easyrider comments:

Let me check one more batch:

Based on my scan of the forum thread, I’ve found several key comments from easyrider (Bill). Let me provide you with a summary and analysis:

## Summary of easyrider’s (Bill’s) Comments on EVs

After scanning through the 85-page forum thread, I found multiple comments from easyrider (Bill). His position on EVs appears **inconsistent and contradictory**, which seems to be what you’ve observed. Here’s what I found:

### Key Themes in Bill’s Comments:

**1. Critical/Skeptical Comments:**

- Posted about fire hazards with Jeep PHEVs and concerns about EV fires affecting insurance claims (page 40, 26)
- Argued EVs have worse reliability, repair, longevity, and resale value than ICE vehicles (page 32)
- Cited Tesla’s declining sales, falling profits, and job cuts in 2024 (page 28)
- Claimed most people “could care less” about EVs and that the carbon footprint isn’t much different from ICE vehicles (page 28)
- Expressed skepticism about EV infrastructure and electricity generation capacity (page 48)
- Questioned the value of time spent charging: “If a person only spent one hour a month on their EV, what is that hour worth?” (page 48)
- Worried about cold weather charging conditions (page 54)

**2. More Neutral/Accepting Comments:**

- Acknowledged that “all major auto manufacturers are about to go under because of Federal Mandates requiring them to develop EVs” and that it gives Tesla/Rivian an advantage (page 40)
- Discussed Washington State EV rebates matter-of-factly (page 52)
- Asked practical questions about FSD liability (page 75)
- Made observations about gas station economics (page 38)

### Do His Comments Make Objective Sense?

**Not really.** Bill’s arguments contain several issues:

1. **Cherry-picking data**: He cites Tesla’s 2024 struggles but ignores broader EV market trends and context
1. **Contradictions**: He simultaneously acknowledges EVs give some manufacturers competitive advantages while claiming they’re fundamentally flawed
1. **Outdated concerns**: Many of his worries (charging infrastructure, electricity capacity) were more valid 5-10 years ago
1. **False equivalencies**: His carbon footprint claims oversimplify complex lifecycle analyses
1. **Inconsistent position**: As you noted, he seems negative, then somewhat accepting, then negative again

### My Opinion

Bill appears to be someone who:

- Has formed a generally negative view of EVs but occasionally encounters information that challenges that view
- Raises some valid concerns (cold weather charging convenience, time value) mixed with outdated or exaggerated ones
- Seems to be arguing more from confirmation bias than objective analysis
- May be financially motivated to prefer ICE (he mentions gas station economics with surprising detail)
- Engages in what another user called “internet talking points” rather than real-world experience

The most telling exchange is on page 48, where another user (HitchHiker71) directly calls out Bill’s comments as “internet talking points from a skeptic” versus their own “real world experience after 1.5 years of ownership.” This suggests Bill may not actually own an EV and is arguing more from ideology or speculation than experience.

**Bottom line:** Bill’s comments don’t represent a coherent, evidence-based position. They read more like someone who’s made up their mind against EVs but occasionally encounters facts that don’t fit that narrative, creating the inconsistent pattern you’ve observed.

 

[HitchHiker71]

Haha. Nice try. This was Claude’s first report on your posts in this thread before I asked it to create a summary.

I’d be curious to see Claude’s assessment of my own posts on this same thread.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[emeryjre]

I’d be curious to see Claude’s assessment of my own posts on this same thread.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Probably will reflect you pro EV sentiment
You like Teslas
You will defend Tesla Technology against all comers
You stick to the facts and do not do personal attacks
AI might add more
This is my summary

 

[Ken555]

I’d be curious to see Claude’s assessment of my own posts on this same thread.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

On a 11 hour flight about to depart but will check this in the next day or two. Easy to do now that I’ve got it working for the entire thread.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk