What if HKB implements a "resort fee" & "parking fee" for non-owner reservations? So imagine a scenario where you own a deeded week at another HVC resort and you successfully use your 2200 points to trade into HKB. Then as a non-owner at HKB you have to pay a resort fee and parking fee in addition to the Hawaii daily tax. That could amount to a total of an additional $110 or more per day.
If you are an HKB owner, in theory these fees would help to stem the increase of your annual MF dues. Also, not having to pay these extra junk fees would make HKB ownership more valuable. However, what stops every HVC resort from implementing the same policy? Isn't the draw of deeded ownership to trade and have flexibility? Is the entire portfolio going to go down this route of additional junk fees as a way to offset MF's?
I'm hearing HKB will be making some announcements in the near future along these lines. If true, this makes the entire program less attractive in my opinion. Imagine a time in the near future where you pay a reservation fee to book at a resort other than your home resort, pay a guest fee for a friend to stay there, pay a cancellation fee if your plans change, pay a daily resort fee to dip your toe in the pool, pay a daily parking fee and pay a local daily tax for short-term use. Maybe they should create another fee if you have to check out early. I'm sure as owners we could brainstorm ways to add additional fees to non-owners to keep our MF's from increasing so dramatically....(scarcasm)
Has this resort & parking fees idea been kicked around before? This really makes trading across properties much less attractive....