comicbookman
TUG Member
Special Olympics is a totally different category by itself born out of the compassion of the humane.
It should not even be mentioned in the same breath as participation trophies for the fully-abled born out of the condescension of the elite.
The argument for participation trophies is that it is compassion. Why shouldn't the less gifted be recognized as well. The question is where does one draw the line? is the child who is obese through no fault of there own, and therefore not athletically gifted, considered able-bodied? Is the kid who is not coordinated enough to swim faster than a turtle, fully able-bodied? I think you comment is unintentionally condescending since it implies that you are the arbitrator of who is able-bodied and anyone who disagrees should not speak up. As I have said previously, I am not in favor of participation trophies, but if a majority are, then so be it. And in my world view, they get to mention things like that.