Since Arimaas was one of the only posters to attempt to keep this topic relevant to the actual thread, and in a productive and respectful manner, I'll reply in agreement. We simply don’t know how the impact of these actions will play out. No one knows for sure. Sure we can debate the finer points, but keep it respectful, or future posts from this point foward will be moderated to remove all offending content, or simply outright deleted. If you want to debate these points incessantly in a disrespectful, sarcastic and/or insulting manner, please use PMs/DMs.
For my part, we also don't know what the proportion of inventory is at these older Fairfield resorts that consists of actual pure fixed weeks. I suspect there are more than many of us believe. For these folks, I also suspect that many of them will simply exit the system as a result of these actions. The relative minority that may take a CWA conversion, likely won't significantly impact availability either way. It's also worth noting that that average points owner makes reservations 5-6 months out. This is data kept by Wyndham and it's published annually in the owner review meetings. So while TUGGERs may make a big deal about 10 vs 13 month reservations, again this serves as an example of TUGGERS being the exception not the rule when it comes to both timeshare knowledge and timeshare usage, which reinforcees Arimaas's point made above. The bottom line is, no one knows what the impact will be.
