• Welcome to the FREE TUGBBS forums! The absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 31 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 32 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 32st anniversary: Happy 32st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    All subscribers auto-entered to win all free TUG membership giveaways!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Wyndham is closing a handful of legacy resorts - dedicated chart/tracker located in the first post for this unfolding set of events

This afternoon, Travel and Leisure CEO Michael Brown was interviewed on CNBC as T&L stock was soaring at 15.3% intra day. Here is why it is soaring today.

"Travel + Leisure is up 39.5% since the beginning of the year, and at $69.57 per share, has set a new 52-week high. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Travel + Leisure’s shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $1,934."

I guess doubling their money in five years ain't bad. But I'm sure happy I bought berk.b instead of T&L five years ago :)
 
Believe me, I am not a Wyndham apologist, but without people buying retail, Wyndham does not exist and we don't benefit from our ownership.
There are several resort management only companies out there. They could still exist just from earning management fees. Not every timeshare has to be actively selling. Though selling is where the bigger bucks are made.
 
Their sales are up. Seems we aren't doing a good enough job persuading people to buy resale...
Sales are up (specifically VOI sales) and profits are up, which means those who want to believe that Wyndham is selling off resorts because of financial trouble, don't have a leg to stand on really.
 
Sales are up (specifically VOI sales) and profits are up, which means those who want to believe that Wyndham is selling off resorts because of financial trouble, don't have a leg to stand on really.
I know they are selling because the resorts are old and in need of major improvements and not enough owners. That is why timeshares should be RTU with expiration date. That said I hope Wyndham does add more resorts in the Northeast, Philadelphia would be a nice addition. So would Martha's Vineyard or Nantucket.
 
I know they are selling because the resorts are old and in need of major improvements and not enough owners. That is why timeshares should be RTU with expiration date. That said I hope Wyndham does add more resorts in the Northeast, Philadelphia would be a nice addition. So would Martha's Vineyard or Nantucket.
100%, they were the only chain big in the NE. The NYC / Boston Studio/1BR don't count in my mind as those are basically the same as many hotels... But I also figure it's hard to get TS to work up here cause you basically can only do Ski for year round coverage...
 
I know they are selling because the resorts are old and in need of major improvements and not enough owners. That is why timeshares should be RTU with expiration date. That said I hope Wyndham does add more resorts in the Northeast, Philadelphia would be a nice addition. So would Martha's Vineyard or Nantucket.
I think most TUGGERs are aware that it has nothing to do with financials. There are tons of folks on the Wyndham FB groups that seem to be woefully uninformed though, and seem to be under the impression that Wyndham is in financial trouble - why else would they be dumping resorts? That's why I tend to avoid the FB groups for the most part, way too much noise as opposed to signal. I would like to see more resorts in the northeast without a doubt, given we live in the mid-Atlantic area. We are now down to only two resorts within a two hour drive - National Harbor and Alexandria. Midtown45 is within three hours - traffic dependent. Then we jump up to 5-6 hours - Newtown RI and Williamsburg. 2-2.5 hours each way is about our drivetime limit for weekend getaways.
 
Northeast is problematic because it is highly seasonal. This is why you mainly see older and smaller independent properties up there. The bigger brands want resorts in locations where people are more likely to travel year round. Where seasonal fluctuations aren't as high. Thus also why we see the occupancy rates at these properties where they are. They may have decent occupancy in the few peak months but outside of those the places are mostly a ghost town. Wyndham dumping these properties.

I think they could do well with properties in the larger cities in the north east. City destinations can do better year round and I think they actually did a good job with the Atlanta and Nashville (Margaritaville) properties.
 
Believe me, I am not a Wyndham apologist, but without people buying retail, Wyndham does not exist and we don't benefit from our ownership.
I harbor no illusions about the tiny percentage of total owners we help with our advice, but we do help those few.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the kind words on my earlier post. I got a copy of the presentation and have cleaned up the table. Presentation attached.

Could the "Ridge Top Village - 2 BR Deluxe" be the Valley View units owned separately from the HOA? I also heard that Fairway has some year-round residents. Also it is interesting that the table below (from the Hilco real estate presentation) slices up the units a little differently.

NRA - Net Rentable Area

Unit TypeNo. Of UnitsAverage Unit SizeNRA (ft2)
River Village – 2 BR361,10039,600
River Village Phase IIIB – 2 BR1321,100145,200
Fairway House – 1 BR109609,600
Fairway House – 2 BR391,13644,304
Depuy House – 1 BR78005,600
Depuy House – 2 BR661,20079,200
Ridge Top Village – 2 BR2051,151235,955
Ridge Top Village – 2 BR Deluxe441,33058,520
Ridge Top Crestview – 4 BR Pres32,2846,852
Ridge Top Crestview – 2 BR381,14443,472
Total/Average5801,152668,303
 

Attachments

  • Shawnee-River Village IIIB SPEC MEMBER MTG PPT-2025.10.20.pdf
    5.8 MB · Views: 12
Last edited:
Thanks for the kind words on my earlier post. I got a copy of the presentation and have cleaned up the table. Presentation attached.

Could the "Ridge Top Village - 2 BR Deluxe" be the Valley View units owned separately from the HOA? I also heard that Fairway has some year-round residents.

IME the RT two bedroom deluxe units are at the top of the hill in an area called Ridge Top Summit. Both Club Wyndham and Worldmark hold inventory in these units. I don’t recall seeing any dedicated parking spaces in the two streets off of the main drag that constitute the Summit area either - and we have stayed in both areas repeatedly over time - but it’s possible. On the map below - the Summit units are color coded in light blue.

VV is not located anywhere near the Summit area though. VV is located not far from the main lodge - the road is called Valley View drive - resort map below for reference:

IMG_4682.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
IME the RT two bedroom deluxe units are at the top of the hill in an area called Ridge Top Summit. Both Club Wyndham and Worldmark hold inventory in these units. I don’t recall seeing any dedicated parking spaces in the two streets off of the main drag that constitute the Summit area either - and we have stayed in both areas repeatedly over time - but it’s possible. On the map below - the Summit units are color coded in light blue.

VV is not located anywhere near the Summit area though. VV is located not far from the main lodge - the road is called Valley View drive - resort map below for reference:
Thanks again for helpful info... I've never spent so much time researching this timeshare since we bought it around 2001!

The "VV" units are in the general area of RT49-54 in the map you shared, although they dont have "RT" numbers.

I hope the delay in organizing meetings for the Ridge Top HOA will not impact or delay bankruptcy proceedings for the other HOAs.
 
Thanks again for helpful info... I've never spent so much time researching this timeshare since we bought it around 2001!

The "VV" units are in the general area of RT49-54 in the map you shared, although they dont have "RT" numbers.

I hope the delay in organizing meetings for the Ridge Top HOA will not impact or delay bankruptcy proceedings for the other HOAs.

Yup that’s where the VV units are located. My general understanding is that each HOA is basically a separate incorporated entity so a delay for one HOA should not alter the process, unless Wyndham and the HOAs choose to delay said processes - such as delaying the bankruptcy filings - until all HOAs have voted accordingly. That’s actually a good question that I will plan to ask Wyndham on my Friday upcoming touchbase.

Also, it occurred to me that when we use the two bedroom deluxe terminology - we are only referring to the Summit units. There are other two bedroom deluxe units elsewhere in the resort - including Crestview and Depuy. The differentiator between a normal two bedroom and a deluxe within all of Wyndham Shawnee is the main bedrooms have king sized beds, as opposed to queen or double beds in the non-deluxe units. We pretty much stick with the deluxe units as a result.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I
Yup that’s where the VV units are located. My general understanding is that each HOA is basically a separate incorporated entity so a delay for one HOA should not alter the process, unless Wyndham and the HOAs choose to delay said processes - such as delaying the bankruptcy filings - until all HOAs have voted accordingly. That’s actually a good question that I will plan to ask Wyndham on my Friday upcoming touchbase.

Also, it occurred to me that when we use the two bedroom deluxe terminology - we are only referring to the Summit units. There are other two bedroom deluxe units elsewhere in the resort - including Crestview and Depuy. The differentiator between a normal two bedroom and a deluxe within all of Wyndham Shawnee is the main bedrooms have king sized beds, as opposed to queen or double beds in the non-deluxe units. We pretty much stick with the deluxe units as a result.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do you know what is going on with Fairways?
 
"Travel + Leisure is up 39.5% since the beginning of the year, and at $69.57 per share, has set a new 52-week high.
This is additional confirmation of speculation posted on Day 2 (July 12) of this thread, just before the second quarter earnings announcement, which did not discuss the resorts closures and had no effect on the stock price.
Does this information [resort closures] have a chance to impact share price?
In a word, "No."
 
Also posted on Day 2 of this thread (July 12):
The real timeshare revenue is in sales. That is what the 10k reports and conference calls focus on.
The focus in the Q3 earnings call remains sales as measured by Volume Per Guest (VPG):

"Outlook & Guidance
Travel + Leisure Co raised its full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance to between $965 and $985 million. The company also increased its gross VOI sales guidance to $2.45 to $2.50 billion and raised its VPG guidance to $3,250 to $3,275. These upward revisions indicate management’s confidence in sustained growth and operational efficiency."
 
I

Do you know what is going on with Fairways?

The Ridge Top HOA and the Fairways HOA have additional complexities involved that will take more time and effort to work through. I don’t have details outside of a general understanding that these two HOAs have whole interval ownerships to deal with that may contribute to the complexities and delays.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
And to conclude from Day 2 of this thread:
It will be interesting if it gets a mention in the next quarterly report conference call.
The resorts closures did get a mention in the next "next quarterly" Q3 earnings call (bolding added for those who just want to skim):

"Stephen Grambling, Analyst, Morgan Stanley: Great. Just a quick follow-up question here. I’ve noticed some online message board discussion about closing a handful of your legacy resorts. If, in fact, that’s true, it’s not something you typically see. If, in fact, that is happening, I’m curious what the rationale for that may be and what, if any, might be the financial impact to your company from apps. Thank you.

Michael Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer, Travel + Leisure Co.: Patrick, you’re about probably 30 or 30 minutes or an hour ahead of us. You’ll see it as part of our disclosures exactly this today as part of our disclosures and our queue. This is really, I would call it, resort portfolio maintenance. I would describe what we’re doing as a catch-up to what we probably should have been doing over the last decade and what all hospitality companies do, which is you look at your high and low demand locations, same with satisfaction scores, and add new inventory with better demand, better seasonality, newer construction into your system. We’ve announced a double-digit number of those resorts over the last few years. On an annual basis, look at your portfolio and pull out the ones that no longer have that demand, are primarily renters or low owner occupancy or low satisfaction scores. That’s exactly what we’re doing.

It’s a relatively small amount. I would say it’s maybe 10 or 12 this year, somewhere in that range. I cannot be specific because we haven’t finished the process, and therefore, the number isn’t finalized. It’s a relatively small amount. It’s a catch-up year. I think the other big implication or awareness that is part of this decision-making is, you know, we’ve been in business a very long time, decades. As resorts move along, your normal room renovation gets into bigger items such as infrastructure, things like rooms and bigger expense items. What this also greatly helps to do is avoid any significant special assessments, which is to the benefit of the owners and the overall system.
I would say this is a very normal process of bringing new resorts into the systems, all the things we’ve announced in our press releases, and taking out the ones who’ve reached their natural useful life. We’re providing a lot of optionality for those owners to get back into our system or exit fully. I think this is normal maintenance and a little bit of a catch-up that we probably should have been doing over the last decade and others continue to do.

Stephen Grambling, Analyst, Morgan Stanley: Okay. Good color. Is it fair to think that one of the reasons perhaps for closing these down, if you do have on-sold inventory, or which is inventory you own, you would not be on the hook for a special assessment? It might save you money there by closing these down. Is that one way to think about it?

Michael Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer, Travel + Leisure Co.: That’s one way to think about it. I think it’s only the partial answer as well. The answer I originally gave around overall resort portfolio is primary. The second is, yeah, whether it’s an individual owner or us as a developer, absolutely what you said is accurate. The flip side of that is some of these have sales locations. You might be thinking, "Oh, well, this is just an economic plus. There’s no economic minus." If any of these resorts do have sales locations, that’s the balancing minus. When you net it all out, the clear benefit is a better, newer, less seasonal, higher demanded, higher occupancy portfolio. There are economic downstream effects, which we don’t, we haven’t estimated or presented the estimation, but there’s one plus and one minus, which is less sales at those locations and less carry cost.

That’s a balancing that we’ll go through should these resorts ultimately end up closed. If they do, then we’ll provide an update on that, I would expect in our Q4 call and as part of any 2026 guidance."
 
Are you surprised that the analyst seemed to be in the dark (or at least dismissive of 'online message boards') about resort closures? Would you be satisfied with the 'relatively small amount' answer? Is that 2 or 3 percent or is it 10% of the portfolio? I tried to get an AI answer to that from Perplexity app, answer was the former but the sources even included this thread!
 
Are you surprised that the analyst seemed to be in the dark (or at least dismissive of 'online message boards') about resort closures?
I am just trying to provide some enlightening information and maybe a few facts -- just for a change of pace in this thread. Are you asking my opinion?

I did not interpret the question as "dismissive" of online message boards. It is clear these are inputs for the analysts, but they are not caught up in the emotion and rumors of online message boards. This was the first time the question of resort closures was broached, so it called for a lot of "if" statements.

Would you be satisfied with the 'relatively small amount' answer? Is that 2 or 3 percent or is it 10% of the portfolio? I tried to get an AI answer to that from Perplexity app, answer was the former but the sources even included this thread!
The analysts focus on Travel + Leisure as a whole, not any specific Club. I am sure the analysts are familiar with the "more than 270 vacation club resorts locations" from the annual 10-K. Michael Brown stated " I would say it’s maybe 10 or 12 this year, somewhere in that range." The analysts can do the arithmetic to arrive at about 4% -- which is "a small amount."
 
Michael Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer, Travel + Leisure Co.: Patrick, you’re about probably 30 or 30 minutes or an hour ahead of us. You’ll see it as part of our disclosures exactly this today as part of our disclosures and our queue. This is really, I would call it, resort portfolio maintenance. I would describe what we’re doing as a catch-up to what we probably should have been doing over the last decade and what all hospitality companies do, which is you look at your high and low demand locations, same with satisfaction scores, and add new inventory with better demand, better seasonality, newer construction into your system. We’ve announced a double-digit number of those resorts over the last few years. On an annual basis, look at your portfolio and pull out the ones that no longer have that demand, are primarily renters or low owner occupancy or low satisfaction scores. That’s exactly what we’re doing.
I love having all this "optionality." And more seasonality.

The numbers cited ("maybe 10 or 12 this year") are lower than what we're seeing, probably because they can hide behind the fact that much of what we have been tracking is likely to take place in 2026 and beyond.
 
I love having all this "optionality." And more seasonality.

The numbers cited ("maybe 10 or 12 this year") are lower than what we're seeing, probably because they can hide behind the fact that much of what we have been tracking is likely to take place in 2026 and beyond.

If we remove the five resort locations where it’s just a downsizing - specifically Pagosa, Edisto, Branson, Williamsburg, and Orlando - the number is actually under 10-12 with regard to resort closures. If we remove only the resorts where HOAs are being downsized, then we're at 12 (out of 14).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Branson has three resorts, and one is closing. It's not multiple HOAs of one resort. Otherwise you could say that Williamsburg is just downsizing, because only one out of three resorts is closing.
 
Branson has three resorts, and one is closing. It's not multiple HOAs of one resort. Otherwise you could say that Williamsburg is just downsizing, because only one out of three resorts is closing.
Yes, that's why I said resort locations - not HOAs - it's a downsizing in the Branson area - the nature of the downsizing is irrelevant. Same with Williamsburg and Newport RI, I just neglected to mention these areas. Point being - there's a marked difference between an area being downsized vs an entire resort closure when it's the only Wyndham presence in that area. So, if we subtract these downsized areas - regardless of the method used - from the 14 resorts on our list - we get 9 - so a bit less than the 10-12 mentioned. If we subtract only the areas where HOAs are being removed - Pagosa and Edisto - then we get 12. So the actual range is 9-12 dependent upon how we slice and dice things.
 
Yes, that's why I said resort locations - not HOAs - it's a downsizing in the Branson area - the nature of the downsizing is irrelevant. Same with Williamsburg and Newport RI, I just neglected to mention these areas. Point being - there's a marked difference between an area being downsized vs an entire resort closure when it's the only Wyndham presence in that area. So, if we subtract these downsized areas - regardless of the method used - from the 14 resorts on our list - we get 9 - so a bit less than the 10-12 mentioned. If we subtract only the areas where HOAs are being removed - Pagosa and Edisto - then we get 12. So the actual range is 9-12 dependent upon how we slice and dice things.
Initially you seemed to conflate "resorts" with "markets" (grouping Branson as a market downsizing with Edisto and Pagosa, which are just a subset of HOAs closing within a single resort that stays open, and referring to them as "the" three resort locations with a downsizing), but as long as you make that distinction clearer I have no problem with that. Don't forget Orlando in the "market" category then.
 
Initially you seemed to conflate "resorts" with "markets" (grouping Branson as a market downsizing with Edisto and Pagosa, which are just a subset of HOAs closing within a single resort that stays open, and referring to them as "the" three resort locations with a downsizing), but as long as you make that distinction clearer I have no problem with that. Don't forget Orlando in the "market" category then.
Well, to be fair I said "resort locations" not resorts. I never used the term markets. In this case, the word resort is a descriptive adjective to the noun locations. That said, I take your point, however I was on my mobile, as was indicated via the Tapatalk signature alert, so I wasn't providing a holistic answer, just a quick reply while on the go. My post has now been corrected to provide a more comprehensive answer now that I'm back at my desk. I suppose I should think twice about replying on my phone these days.
 
Top