We completed the upgrade of the TUGBBS forums recently and are still working on issues/customizations/changes etc. Please post in the thread in the ABOUT TUGBBS section with your feedback. Note if you are unable to log in or access the forums please email us at firstname.lastname@example.org!
Follow the TUG Member Banner as it travels the world on vacation with Timeshare owners! Also sign up to get the banner sent to you so you can submit a photo of your vacation with the banner to share with TUG! Banner Thread
Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free! Join tens of thousands of other owners who get this every week! Latest resort reviews and the most important topics discussed by owners during the week!
Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!
I'm well aware that VRI is a management company; I own several different weeks at two different VRI managed (but otherwise independent) resorts myself, neither one having anything at all to do with the other beyond having the same management company.
But VRI is not actually a resort "system", per se, so it would seem to be irrelevant and meaningless to have it listed among "ownership options". Nonetheless, I see that some folks have apparently (and inexplicably) listed it anyhow. Harmless, certainly, but also completely irrelevant, unless I am just missing something here...
P.S. It has belatedly occured to me that the VRI takeover of ORE (and its weeks) some time ago could, in fact, make VRI an "ownership system" in a limited sort of way, so I guess I withdraw my own question. If there is some other reason as well, I'd be glad to know it.