Just out of curiousity, why is VRI listed here???
I'm well aware that VRI is a management company; I own several different weeks at two different VRI managed (but otherwise independent) resorts myself, neither one having anything at all to do with the other beyond having the same management company.
But VRI is not actually a resort "system", per se, so it would seem to be irrelevant and meaningless to have it listed among "ownership options". Nonetheless, I see that some folks have apparently (and inexplicably) listed it anyhow. Harmless, certainly, but also completely irrelevant, unless I am just missing something here...
P.S. It has belatedly occured to me that the VRI takeover of ORE (and its weeks) some time ago could, in fact, make VRI an "ownership system" in a limited sort of way, so I guess I withdraw my own question. If there is some other reason as well, I'd be glad to know it.