- Joined
- Jun 6, 2005
- Messages
- 5,556
- Reaction score
- 1,340
This is what is a tad irritating about "name" owners - and it doesn't apply only to Marriott. There is what would appear to a buy in to the sales hype that "only XXXX (fill in the brand name or resort) will be like this". Hogwash. The ownership experience of any good timeshare gets you exactly the same appreciation of great family time together in places you want to visit. There is no special magic in a DVC, Marriott or Hilton that can't also be found at No Name Resort X if it is in the right place and reasonably to outstanding in quality. It's that slight arrogance that somehow it's better because you pay more. All it really means is you didn't find the best value to get the same thing.
I fully understand that a name gives a shortcut to (usually) finding the higher end resorts and often locations but it isn't by any means exclusive to the names. In fact some of the very best resorts aren't names and don't need to be - they stand on their own.
And this post is a prime example. It seems the OP truly believes that only a Marriott can rent a lockoff to cover the annual fees or whatever they are looking for. That couldn't be more wrong. As Boca & others can tell you there are plenty of resorts - name & non-name that can do that consistently. And because the non names have fees way less it's easier to accomplish with less overall investment & annual fees.
I'm really not trying to denigrate Marriott or any other name brand as I know they are usually top notch. I'm merely saying that if you think (or newbies believe) that ONLY name brands offer a great experience in timeshare ownership & use then they are being mislead. By all means pay the premium if that makes you happy but don't think you had to or that by doing so you somehow get better than the savvy $1 buyer or renter can also get. Ultimately we all get the same resorts & units (yes, even the penthouse has been ours with a non-name trade).
I also don't mean to aggravate anyone so I'll let it go now. Hopefully I've presented a valid opposing viewpoint and option for those looking to jump in to timeshares as that is all it really is. I love Marriotts as well - I'm just glad we didn't buy one despite being really tempted twice.
I certainly don't get aggravated by your comments, I very much value your right to your own opinion.... I just never seem to agree with it.
For instance please name the numerous resorts that are beautifully situated like a Maui Marriott or Aruba Surf Club and that have lock-offs that rent at a premium to cover or exceed MFs.
Anyone? I'd like to know because I'd be interested in buying multiple weeks.
The main issue I have with your comments are that you don't acknowledge that in some cases you can't "do exactly the same" and need to buy the prime resort in prime season to be able to enjoy that resort at that time of year.
I've acknowledged that in fact you can acheive "similiar" doing off season while travelling short notice, but you just can't do what Greg T and I do for our families with a no name resort. You just can't. You suggest you can but don't offer comparable examples.
When were you able to rent inexpensively or trade into a prime Marriott during prime time without getting lucky with the 60 day window. It can't be done unless your trading something of somewhat similar value.