JudyS
TUG Member
Jim, I often agree with you, but not in this case.There is no way the guy could have gotten the information needed to get a key from the desk except from the 'victim.' And why was her deadbolt and/or chainlock not in place? Obviously the drunken guy used some deception to gain access, but there appears to have been some complacency on the part of the woman.
The guy could have gotten the victim's name and room number without the victim's complatency. All he would have to do is sit in the lobby, within earshot of the desk, pretending to read a paper. When a suitable victim checks in, he listens for her to tell the clerk her name. Then, he listens for the clerk to tell the woman her room number. (Even if clerk just shows the room number on a piece of paper, the clerk is likely to say what floor the room is on. The guy can go to that floor while the woman is finishing up her transaction at the front desk, hang out in the ice machine area (or wherever) and see what room the woman goes to.)
Do I know that this happened in this case? No, I don't, but you don't what happened, either. There is no evidence that the woman gave alleged intruder her name or room number. And, the reality is that many rapists admit to having planned out their crimes.
As for door chains and those little metal doohickeys you can latch, maybe she did have hers on. They are there to keep housekeeping from accidentally walking in on you. They won't keep out a determined intruder.