Ridewithme38
TUG Member
If that's easier to believe for you, Ride.
National Geographic and History Channel just present the facts. It's very interesting to watch, and I know a few people who didn't believe in anything they could not see and touch, literally doubting Thomases, but no longer. You don't even have to watch these shows with an open mind.
Yup, i don't know if the Shroud is real or if it fraud, but i know that we have no evidence that it was ever used on any specific person and with the thousands upon thousands of people that WERE crucified during that time frame and assuming it is real and is an image of an actual person, used in the way guessed at.....That person could be ANYONE
"Sadly, we have seen many claims spread in the Web made by journalist/bloggers that discuss the content of a paper they never read," lead researcher Paolo Di Lazzaro told me today in an email. "It is obvious that a serious scientific work cannot prove any supernatural action. We have shown that the most advanced technology available today is unable to replicate all the characteristics of the Shroud image. As a consequence, we may argue it appears unlikely a forger may have done this image with technologies available in the Middle Ages or earlier. The probability the Shroud is a medieval fake is really low. In this sense, the Shroud image is still a scientific challenge."
Last edited: