I can verify the information that we gave to ABC as I worked directly with our CEO in communicating with the reporter. Unfortunately, the reporter failed to provide the complete statement that we gave that Festiva no longer hires outsourced companies to sell our product AT OUR RESORTS, i.e. those resorts that we own and/or manage.
Again, the outsourced company involved in the Missouri AG was NOT Outfield, it was Summerwinds, a company that was selling for us on-site at our Branson resort. The AG allegations took place well before we ever employed anyone to do home visits of any kind. I would love to know where you got the information that it was Outfield.
As cautious consumers, I'm sure you all know and keep in mind that the media has their own way to spin facts to make a better story.
I apparently was mistaken. I assumed that all who filed complaints from 2005 until the settlement with the MO AG in June of 2008 were part of the suit. I have plenty of posts discussing Outfield's sales of Festiva points and details of their sales techniques from 2007 to the present. I re-read and realized that only those who filed in 2005 or prior were covered under the suit. I also assume (feel free to correct me) that Outfield was hired as soon as the AG filed suit to start selling instead of Summerwinds. This way sales never stopped, Southwind could be portrayed as the rogue sales force( making them the scapegoat), and Outfield steps in with stories about how owners weeks will become useless and unsuseable with RCI unless the owner pays to convert to points.
TV news shows are not the only ones who spin facts to make their story sound better, some companies do the same thing to make money and cover their tails. Hmm, if I had to believe a lying local TV news show's story or the honest timeshare company's story, who would I believe as a cautious consumer?
http://www.legalnewsline.com/news/213804-time-share-company-agrees-to-pay-339000-settlement
Two questions.
1. Why would you continue to hire 3rd party sales force after being sued and settling in missouri and after removing Outfield (a 3'rd party sales force) from in house sales due to complaints at Peppertree.
2. Why would you continue to allow Outfield to market in people's homes when you won't allow them to market onsite? If they are doing things to make owners mad at the resort, imagine what they are saying in people's homes with no one around to hear them. If they are unacceptable at the resort for sales, then why aren't they also unacceptable for in home sales?
Last edited: