Such is the problem with trying to separate Worldmark out of the other Wyndham systems. There is going to be more confusion like this. If you look at the Wyndham Worldwide home page, it clearly identifies the "four primary consumer brands, CLUB WYNDHAM®, WorldMark by Wyndham, Wyndham Vacation Resorts Asia Pacific and Shell Vacations Club."
http://www.wyndhamworldwide.com/about-wyndham-worldwide/wyndham-vacation-ownership
Yes, WVR Asia Pacific
used to be Worldmark South Pacific, and Wyn has not and probably will never change Worldmark South Pacific in old (
or current) literature (that you can find in web search) to its current legal name of WVR Asia Pacific (which it uses on legal stuff like copyright). Wyndham likes them intertwined. They like fuzzy boundaries - to cross-sell
I think the main question for TUG's separation of a Worldmark sub-forum is whether the questions, answers and discussions pertaining to WVR Asia Pacific belong with (1) the Worldmark sub-forum, or (2) the main Wyndham forum which has everything else. As their governing documents, rules and procedures, and resorts are different from those of Worldmark, I think the latter.
Another question is the fractionals/Residence Clubs. There are 3 Wyndham Residence Clubs: Depoe Bay, Seaside, and South Shore. They are intertwined with Worldmark, but their GDs, rules and procedures, and web sites are separate, and they have each of the 3 resorts as home resorts, whereas Worldmark has no home resorts. When people have questions on them, the Worldmark forum may not have the answers, because the Worldmark GDs and rules and procedures do not govern them.
Such is the problem of separating the intertwined Worldmark/Wyndham systems.