- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Messages
- 7,273
- Reaction score
- 1,992
- Location
- Milwaukee, WI
- Resorts Owned
- After 40+ years of T/S ownership, I am no longer "an owner"
My photo in print by the musher, Egil Ellis.
My photo in print by the musher, Egil Ellis.
Hey - I recognize that place!!!
Looks as if you were there on a VOG-free day.
Many photoshop type programs have a similar feature now. Also any camera that has manual, aperture, or shutter speed priority settings can be used to create shallow depth of field. Since most digital cameras except the very cheapest ones have M-A-S options, you don't need a DSLR camera to work with depth of field.
++++++
A big limitation of the depth of field software tools is that you have to identify a specific oval or circle shape that is the area to remain in focus while the rest of the photo is blurred. If that oval contains background details, those details remain sharp and in focus instead of blurring as they would if the photo had been shot with a large aperture. For example, in the photo you selected the carved-wood duck and the candlestick holder in the background next to the lamp are in sharp focus. But the adjacent lamp, which is the same focal distance, is half in focus and half out of focus because the blurring selection passed through the middle of the lamp. There are some similar conditions at the base of the bowl.
Another way to do the same thing (and get some added photo enhancement benefits) is to make a feathered selection of the area you want blurred, then apply a blur to that selected area.
I had similar issues creating a suitable blurred area with this photo of my nephew, his wife, and their daughter.
With the range of objects in the photo I couldn't use the blurring tool to get everything to come out right. The objects in the background directly behind the sofa are a particular problem. The snowman figure and the chimes naturally draw attention, but using the blurring tool I couldn't blur them without also including peoples heads in the blurred area. To get around that, I selected the areas I wanted to blur using the selection tool (including both the near field portions of the blanket close to my camera and the far field objects and wall behind the sofa). I then applied a blur to that selected area. I did some additional work on the photo to remove red eye and flash reflection, and adjust color balance and skin tones. Here's the final result:
++++++++++++
When you do the selection technique it allows you to do some other manipulations of the background that can further minimize distracting photo elements.
In this photo of another one of my nephews I thought the greenish wall behind him made an unattractive background and I found my attention sometimes being drawn to the color clash and the foliage behind his head instead of to my nephew's face.
So after selecting the background area, not only did I blur the background, but I changed the background to a less obtrusive and more harmonious tone.
didn't travel far for this shot (almost in my backyard), just a little bit "photoshopped"
My precious Zoe in Florida.
She drives . . . she scores!