I'm not sure how this will turn out in the long run, but with the recent changes to SVN itself (vistana, flex, etc), these types of changes became more possible. I doubt we've seen the last change, either.
SVO's behavior becomes a lot more predictable if you assume that all of the changes they began implementing a couple of years ago are part of a well-orchestrated
master plan rather than simply arbitrary.
Viewed through that lens, StarOptions banking was always -- rather obviously, in hindsight -- the mechanism by which SVO could start developing new resorts at higher SO values without fundamentally breaking the SVN marketplace. Everybody knows that 148,100 & 196,900 were the top-tier 2BR and 3BR valuations. Without banking, there was no way to introduce "inflation" into the StarOption currency because the new WSJ 257,700 valuations could only be
deposited in SVN but never
redeemed. When StarOptions banking was introduced, it seemed like such a great feature -- but in reality it makes it much, much easier to continually devalue SOs because hey, you can always bank this year's StarOptions and reserve that shiny new resort next year. It also acts as a very useful sales tool by encouraging owners to regularly "trade up" to new resorts with higher SO valuations.
I know what you're thinking -- as owners trade up, how will SVO resell those newly devalued deeds? I'm glad you asked. If I were SVO, I would probably create a holding company that sells points packages backed by all of those deeds. Oh wait, they already did that.
Not to derail this thread, but this is fundamentally the reason why I think it's obvious that SVO will begin adding new resorts to the existing Sheraton Flex plan -- and possibly a new Westin Flex plan for the higher-end resorts -- but will stop selling them as individually deeded, or even individually "pointed" (i.e. WSJ-CV), ownerships.
I could be wrong, but I'm having a hard time coming up with a reason why...