• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 30th anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $23,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $23 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Marriott Vacations Worldwide (VAC) purchase of Interval Leisure Group (ILG) discussion!

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
50,564
Reaction score
22,031
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
My prediction is: We will have to wait at least two years before we know anything. First, the sale has to actually go through. Second, it will take them time to figure out how to cut internal duplication and realize some quick cost savings (let's put out bids to suppliers for toilet paper, etc for cost savings). Third, they'll need time to decide if they'll continue to run different programs or combine into one (that will take a LOT of thought). Fourth, they dream up ways to "enhance" each program (somehow they'll give us access to additional properties). Then they'll have to actually design/merge computer systems or at least get them to talk to each other. At that point, they'll start throwing a few crumbs our way. And at a later date they'll actually start "selling" the new program. Remember, it wasn't until a month ago that we found out how Marriott and Starwood programs were going to merge (and there were no deeds/purchase contracts with customers involved) and that took two years.
So we have two more years of this speculation. I wonder how long this thread will get by then?
 

SueDonJ

Moderator
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Messages
16,695
Reaction score
5,932
Location
Massachusetts and Hilton Head Island
Resorts Owned
Marriott Barony Beach and SurfWatch
So we have two more years of this speculation. I wonder how long this thread will get by then?

The pre-DC speculation thread is the most active thread in TUG's Marriott forum with 2,959 Replies and 200,323 Views, begun 2/9/10 and closed 6/21/10. We have miles to go before we sleep. :D
 

jimf41

TUG Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2006
Messages
2,604
Reaction score
566
Location
Stony Brook, New York
Is the skim zero sum over 52 weeks? Is there, say, a deeded week in the low season that converts to 2000 points but costs only 1,500 points to reserve?
Yes, an Ocean Pointe silver 3bd will convert to 4225 DC points. An Ocean Pointe gold 3bd can be had for 4000 DC points.

I own 7 weeks, 4 at Ocean Pointe FL and 3 at Frenchmans Cove St Thomas. Each year I convert all my Ocean Pointe weeks and use my Frenchmans Cove weeks. I have never lost a point to "skim". I do in fact make points every time I convert. In order to take advantage of this benefit I do have to pay an annual fee of about $250 but that's a small price for the ability to trade a low season week for a high season week even up.
 

BigMac

Guest
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
193
Reaction score
36
Location
San Diego County
transcript from the MAR earnings call May 9th.

My follow-up, Arne, is whether there's any benefit to Marriott from the Marriott Vacation Club acquisition of ILG.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arne M. Sorenson, Marriott International, Inc. - President, CEO & Director [68]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generally, it will simplify things, and as a consequence, I think we're supportive of it. We've got good relationships with MVW and ILG. We had -- Leeny and team had already completed negotiations with both of those companies so that we were free to proceed with the merger of the loyalty programs and the websites and all the rest of it. So those restrictions were behind us. Nevertheless, I think to be able to deal with one company and not have either one of them necessarily looking behind the curtains to see, "Is there possibly something you've given to one that you haven't given to us?" will simplify things a little bit. I don't think it will be dramatic.
 

Steve Fatula

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
3,722
Reaction score
2,721
Location
Calera, OK
Yes, an Ocean Pointe silver 3bd will convert to 4225 DC points. An Ocean Pointe gold 3bd can be had for 4000 DC points.

I own 7 weeks, 4 at Ocean Pointe FL and 3 at Frenchmans Cove St Thomas. Each year I convert all my Ocean Pointe weeks and use my Frenchmans Cove weeks. I have never lost a point to "skim". I do in fact make points every time I convert. In order to take advantage of this benefit I do have to pay an annual fee of about $250 but that's a small price for the ability to trade a low season week for a high season week even up.

That great! I was not aware of any resort where that was the case, but obviously there is. I see Silver is 4225, but gold is 3725, strange!
 

JIMinNC

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,938
Reaction score
4,534
Location
Marvin, NC (Charlotte) & Hilton Head Island, SC
Resorts Owned
Marriott:
Maui Ocean Club
Waiohai Beach Club
Barony Beach Club
Abound ClubPoints
HGVC:
HGVC at Sea World
I just listened to a recording of the 1Q 2018 Marriott Vacations Worldwide earnings call. There was obviously a lot of discussion about the ILG merger. They hope to close by the end of September 2018. Below are some of the more interesting quotes from the call, copied from the transcript. Apologize for the length. The most interesting comments were from the questions, particularly the last two - one about the potential to expand the MVC inventory repurchase model to ILG locations, and the last one about how the merger will impact their plans to spend on building out new legacy MVC inventory.

Steve Weisz: We see tremendous potential from the combination of the Marriott Vacation Club brands with Vistana Signature Experiences, not only from the additional linkage opportunities those will provide but also from our ability to maximize tour generation from our call transfer program across the broader portfolio. Additionally, while we are already optimistic about the future contract sales growth potential of the digital transfer opportunity we will begin soon with Marriott, the additional marketing opportunities of our combined company creates even more ability to generate incremental sales volume.

Question from Analyst: So you outlined a few of the opportunities for revenue synergies. As you're thinking about those, which ones do you think you might tackle first, offering the biggest opportunity? And what kind of timetable do you expect in terms of reviewing ILG and assessing best practices?

Steve Weisz: First of all, as you might imagine, through due diligence, we were able to get through kind of the top-level review, and we have some ideas along the way. I'll share some of those with you. As far as specific timing, we're still a little early on in that. But as you might imagine, we'll get to that as quickly as we possibly can, post closing. So here are a couple of obvious things. Obviously, linkage opportunities, which, today, we have exclusivity on in the vacation ownership space. As soon as the businesses are combined, that exclusivity will now include everything under the Vistana Signature Experiences area, which really gives us exclusive marketing rights into 15 of the Marriott lodging brands. If we think about call transfer, once again, where we have an exclusive -- we will certainly add the Westin and vacation locations from the VSE portfolio into the call transfer program. And then the other thing that we're probably as excited, if not more excited about, rather than calls transfer, is the whole digital idea. Keep in mind what that is. This is essentially taking the digital-analog to call transfer, where people are calling into a reservation center to either make or change a reservation, where we eventually see if we can speak with them about scheduling a tour, which -- you now do it in the digital space, where, as you well know, the Marriott website is one of the top 10 retail websites in the world as it exists today, before you combine it with the Starwood platform, et cetera. And so we think as more and more people transact with Marriott in a digital space, that we will get the benefit of that coming to us in terms of the effective -- without a different word, the effectiveness of digital call transfer versus physical call transfer. So we see those things. I mean there are some other things that we see kind of right on the top of the line. We think we can actually have some influence to grow financing propensity between the businesses. We've had some great success in our portfolio by virtue of some of the things that we've done lately. We think there are some ways in which we can continue to grow revenues that way. Those are just some examples. And obviously, we're going to continue to work hard on trying to quantify as much of this as we can between now and the time of closing, which we hope to be at the end of September. But that's the approach we're going to take.

Question from Analyst: You may be aware of a little bit of chatter out there about would it makes sense for RCI and then the Interval exchange network to combine. And, perhaps dating myself here, but I recall quite a few years ago that CUC and Cendant had to spin out II due to antitrust issues. Do you think antitrust issues would be an issue today given the changes in that part of the industry in the last 15 years to 20 years?

Steve Weisz: I certainly don't have a lot of purview as to what -- how the FTC might think about that. Let's just say that, at this point in time, we have no plans to spin off the Interval International business or combine it, but I guess all things are possible.

Later in the call Weisz came back to clarify this point:

Steve Weisz:
I want to make sure I didn't give anybody the wrong impression on Interval International. We have absolutely no plans to sell or spin off that business. I mean, to be honest, you took me a little bit by surprise because when you mentioned that there was chatter out there about RCI and II coming together, I'll be honest, that's the absolute first time I've ever heard that. So I want to make sure that everybody understands that we put great value on the Interval business, and we think it's a very attractive business with great cash flow profile and a relatively low CapEx profile to it. And so we have no intentions to move in that direction.

Question from Analyst: One thing I think about is you folks have grown your inventory repurchase program considerably and it's a little bit of an unknown what's going on with ILG. I'm wondering how your repurchase program compares to ILG's?

Steve Weisz: We think ours is a little bit more robust than what we see in the ILG space, and we think the volumes that we put through the -- our repurchase program is a little higher than what we see in the ILG side. There may be opportunities there. Obviously, one of the benefits of that is it allows people that have been very happy owners an exit path that we think is appropriate. Plus it allows us to recycle some inventory at a very reasonable inventory cost.

John Geller: The Points product that we have really enables us to be very effective in reselling it because we put it into the Points product and sell it. And historically, they've sold more of a weeks-based product. They've gone to the Points now, which actually will help facilitate that, but they, to Steve's point, I'm not sure they've done a lot of that. And as we've talked about, because with the weeks-based, when you repurchase those, you don't have certainty to get that into the system and resell it. So folks that sell weeks-based product have a much harder time efficiently recycling that weeks-based product.

Question from Analyst: A large part of the Interval's -- the ILG story was all of the inventory for sale coming up in the next couple of years. Certainly, they had a massive amount. With this acquisition and that large amount of inventory, does that change how you think about your -- or the legacy Marriott Vacations spend on inventory the next couple of years?

John Geller: One of the nice benefits that we get, which is never captured in anybody's EBITDA multiple, is ILG has made significant investments in their inventory pipeline and have -- I believe it's 700, 800 of completed units now -- they have obviously down in Cabo, plus their Nanea project. So that's great for us because that's a lot of good inventory. We don't need to go out...I think over time, we would look to do a very similar model like we do today, which is we're looking to add new flags, add new sales distributions, and time the spending of our inventory to replace what we're selling off the shelf each year. And so that's strategy long term. In the near term, we're going to have the opportunity, because of a lot of great locations they've built, to look at near-term opportunities on our inventory spend. So obviously, we'll be updating you on that as our plans get a little bit clearer and we determine what we're doing.

We're going to be working on that in terms of our longer-term integration plans and how we're going to position products, which will obviously drive our inventory needs. But what I'd say on a combined basis, as I mentioned, the ILG and the inventory they've built out, we're in a good spot there. And maybe potentially the ability to leverage some of that inventory as we think about our Marriott because under our -- combined for the Marriott licensed brands, that's all on the table, if you will, in terms of how we think about that inventory. So we definitely need to do that work here, and obviously, we'll be back with more updates as we progress through and talk about all the great opportunities that this combination, we think, brings for us.
 
Last edited:

JIMinNC

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,938
Reaction score
4,534
Location
Marvin, NC (Charlotte) & Hilton Head Island, SC
Resorts Owned
Marriott:
Maui Ocean Club
Waiohai Beach Club
Barony Beach Club
Abound ClubPoints
HGVC:
HGVC at Sea World
The takeaways I draw from those last two questions are:
  • Long term, they may look for ways to transition the ILG portfolio to a more pure points-based product like the DC to facilitate easier repurchase and recycling of inventory. They clearly do not like the traditional weeks model.
  • In the short run, the large amount of unsold inventory that ILG brings to the table may impact their short term inventory needs and reduce the amount of new inventory that they bring online, but that all depends on how and in what form they choose to integrate their various products. In other words, if they eventually integrate all the brands into one structure, the large amount of unsold ILG inventory might mean they don't need to add inventory on the MVC legacy side. But if they structure things differently and the systems stay more separate, then MVC may still need new supply to fuel DC points sales. It sounds like all options are on the table and they are evaluating the best structure.
 

GregT

TUG Member
TUG Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2007
Messages
7,130
Reaction score
1,891
Location
Carlsbad, CA
Resorts Owned
Marriott: Maui Ocean Club Lahaina Villas (3BRx5), Ko Olina, Shadow Ridge II, Willow Ridge, Aruba Ocean Club, DC Points HGVC: Flamingo, Sea World, I-Drive, Starwood Bella (x4), SDO, TradeWinds, Worldmark
Interesting comments on the conference call. Hard to conclude anything from their answers but I agree with Jim that they clearly like recycling weeks into points, we just need to find out if that extends to recycling Starwood weeks into Marriott Trust (as I still think they will do).

Best,

Greg
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
50,564
Reaction score
22,031
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
Long term, they may look for ways to transition the ILG portfolio to a more pure points-based product like the DC to facilitate easier repurchase and recycling of inventory. They clearly do not like the traditional weeks model.
VSE already has the points based product setup with Westin Flex and Sheraton Flex. They also have the Westin Aventuras in Mexico. I think the structure is there, they just don't have a lot of quality inventory in there yet. The have other fragmented points product out there along with weeks. I don't even know if they are selling weeks at VSE any more.
 

VacationForever

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Messages
17,004
Reaction score
12,062
Location
Somewhere Out There
I am waiting for the speculation to restart based on Jim's post...

Let me start... I am focused on the mention of ILG having plenty of inventory. I think Steve Weisz was referring to the new properties that recently came on and those that are coming on. Well and good... but what about the older sold out properties? Was he saying that when the acquisition of ILG is completed, that MVCI will implement an aggressive repurchasing program for VSE properties? I don't think Hyatt was explicitly called out. Will MVCI have enough inventory through repurchasing program to feed future points sale as well as for (new) points program or DC reservations?
 
Last edited:

WBP

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
707
Reaction score
381
People can say whatever they want about Steve Weisz, MVCI, and MVW, but, at the end of the day, Steve Weisz has been at the helm of MVCI, and its spin-off, for, I'm guessing, 25 years, and Steve Weisz, MVCI, and MVW have a long list of substantial accomplishments over that period. Despite the occasional critics and occasional noise, we've met boatloads of very happy MVCI owners.

Not to suggest that everything that I think about MVCI and MVW is exemplary (the vast majority is), but having experienced the Diamond's, Starwood's, and Wyndham's of the world, I can say with unwavering confidence, that our experiences with/at MVCI/MVW are a million times better than our experiences with/at Diamond, Starwood, and Wyndham's timeshare entities.
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
50,564
Reaction score
22,031
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
I am waiting for the speculation to restart based on Jim's post...

Let me start... I am focused on the mention of ILG having plenty of inventory. I think Steve Weisz was referring to the new properties that recently came on and those that are coming on. Well and good... but what about the older sold out properties? Was he saying that when the acquisition of ILG is completed, that MVCI will implement an aggressive repurchasing program for VSE properties? I don't think Hyatt was explicitly called out. Will MVCI have enough inventory through repurchasing program to feed future points sale as well as for (new) points program or DC reservations?
Vistana certainly hasn't offered any kind of formal repurchase program other than buying back foreclosed weeks from the individual HOAs. With the downturn in II deposits, there may be some pent up demand/supply at voluntary resorts where resale buyers are willing to give their deeds back to VSE/VAC. I don't think it could ever come close to meet the demands of a full time sales operation, but VSE certainly has a lot of inventory at their new properties to meet those needs.
 

JIMinNC

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,938
Reaction score
4,534
Location
Marvin, NC (Charlotte) & Hilton Head Island, SC
Resorts Owned
Marriott:
Maui Ocean Club
Waiohai Beach Club
Barony Beach Club
Abound ClubPoints
HGVC:
HGVC at Sea World
I am waiting for the speculation to restart based on Jim's post...

Let me start... I am focused on the mention of ILG having plenty of inventory. I think Steve Weisz was referring to the new properties that recently came on and those that are coming on. Well and good... but what about the older sold out properties? Was he saying that when the acquisition of ILG is completed, that MVCI will implement an aggressive repurchasing program for VSE properties? I don't think Hyatt was explicitly called out. Will MVCI have enough inventory through repurchasing program to feed future points sale as well as for (new) points program or DC reservations?

The way I interpreted their sorta obtuse and vague statements was 1) ILG has a bunch of new inventory - they specifically mentioned Cabo and Nanea - so depending on how they structure the future program(s) that may or may not change their development plan regarding the legacy MVC DC program. In that, he was specifically speaking about new development/construction/renovation, rather than inventory buybacks; 2) on the topic of buybacks, they intimated that they felt ILG had not been very aggressive with buybacks and that perhaps there was an opportunity there for them to utilize their knowledge and expertise in buybacks to improve the process at ILG and reacquire properties at attractive price points. But he also said that was easier in a pure points environment than in a more traditional weeks-based environment.

VSE already has the points based product setup with Westin Flex and Sheraton Flex. They also have the Westin Aventuras in Mexico. I think the structure is there, they just don't have a lot of quality inventory in there yet. The have other fragmented points product out there along with weeks. I don't even know if they are selling weeks at VSE any more.

That's basically what John Geller said when he said:
"And historically, they've sold more of a weeks-based product. They've gone to the Points now, which actually will help facilitate that, but they, to Steve's point, I'm not sure they've done a lot of that."

I think MVW thinks they can do a better job in building out a points structure, whether they integrate it with the DC or just try to restructure the VSE program(s) in some fashion to resemble the DC more. The sense I got was they may be reluctant to buy back weeks unless they could turn around and put the weeks that were reacquired into one of the trusts. Has VSE put any ROFR'd/foreclosed weeks into their Flex products? Or are their Flex just previously unsold inventory?
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
50,564
Reaction score
22,031
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
Has VSE put any ROFR'd/foreclosed weeks into their Flex products? Or are their Flex just previously unsold inventory?
For Flex they get people to come to a sales presentation and get them to deed back their week ownership and pick up the equivalent number of points and add additional points by buying in to the flex product. They don't have ROFR at a lot of properties, but I would suspect that given the number of conveyances I have seen recorded for their flex products that many come from foreclosure, ROFR and people deeding back when they buy in to Flex.
 

JIMinNC

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,938
Reaction score
4,534
Location
Marvin, NC (Charlotte) & Hilton Head Island, SC
Resorts Owned
Marriott:
Maui Ocean Club
Waiohai Beach Club
Barony Beach Club
Abound ClubPoints
HGVC:
HGVC at Sea World
The other revealing thing was that almost all of the conversation centered around MVC and the VSE brands. Hyatt hardly came up. VSE clearly seems to be the focus due to the synergy with the common ownership now of all those brands by Marriott International.
 

JIMinNC

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,938
Reaction score
4,534
Location
Marvin, NC (Charlotte) & Hilton Head Island, SC
Resorts Owned
Marriott:
Maui Ocean Club
Waiohai Beach Club
Barony Beach Club
Abound ClubPoints
HGVC:
HGVC at Sea World
For Flex they get people to come to a sales presentation and get them to deed back their week ownership and pick up the equivalent number of points and add additional points by buying in to the flex product. They don't have ROFR at a lot of properties, but I would suspect that given the number of conveyances I have seen recorded for their flex products that many come from foreclosure, ROFR and people deeding back when they buy in to Flex.

So if I understand you correctly, whereas MVC got existing weeks to play in their points system through the enrollment route and the DC Exchange, VSE actually has people give up their deeds and buy into pure points that way. I think the MVC approach is the better way.
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
50,564
Reaction score
22,031
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
So if I understand you correctly, whereas MVC got existing weeks to play in their points system through the enrollment route and the DC Exchange, VSE actually has people give up their deeds and buy into pure points that way. I think the MVC approach is the better way.
Correct, there is no option to enroll. Mainly because they already have a points overlay program where at 8 months your points can go anywhere. For all developer buyers and those with mandatory resales, they are already enrolled ala the Marriott approach. The only benefit that deeding back and buying in to Flex is that you can book at any property in the trust at the 12 month mark instead of only your home resort.

The main drawback to Flex, just like DC, is the rather high MF costs associated with most trust products. People have been convinced to sell back deeds that have low MF per SO ratios for what is a very high MF per Home Option ratio in Flex.

Flex was really just a product to package up undesirable weeks to sell as a points product. Somewhat like DC. Though of course, not all weeks in either program are undesirable. But points seem to be an easier sell in the current market.
 

JIMinNC

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,938
Reaction score
4,534
Location
Marvin, NC (Charlotte) & Hilton Head Island, SC
Resorts Owned
Marriott:
Maui Ocean Club
Waiohai Beach Club
Barony Beach Club
Abound ClubPoints
HGVC:
HGVC at Sea World
Correct, there is no option to enroll. Mainly because they already have a points overlay program where at 8 months your points can go anywhere. For all developer buyers and those with mandatory resales, they are already enrolled ala the Marriott approach. The only benefit that deeding back and buying in to Flex is that you can book at any property in the trust at the 12 month mark instead of only your home resort.

The main drawback to Flex, just like DC, is the rather high MF costs associated with most trust products. People have been convinced to sell back deeds that have low MF per SO ratios for what is a very high MF per Home Option ratio in Flex.

Flex was really just a product to package up undesirable weeks to sell as a points product. Somewhat like DC. Though of course, not all weeks in either program are undesirable. But points seem to be an easier sell in the current market.

Under the VSE Flex model, it would seem that it would be much harder for them to get desirable weeks into the Flex (since those were all sold as deeded weeks), so if the high demand weeks aren't in the Flex, then what advantage is the 12 month booking vs booking at 8 months? Seems like even if you bought into Flex all the good stuff would still be at 8 months instead of 12 (if it wasn't all taken up by home resort owners). The MVC approach with the DC exchange seems like a much better way to get quality inventory available to the widest possible owner base. I recognize that VSE already had points, but if you have to wait until 8 months to book attractive weeks, I fail to see the appeal of Flex. The DC seems way more owner-friendly and an easier sell - even though it's still pricey. So, DC seems pricey but with good utility/usability; Flex seems pricey with questionable usability.
 

winger

TUG Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
3,871
Reaction score
372
Location
Northern California
Thanks. Wow that sucks. There is no notion of "skimming" in Hilton or Staroption systems. We will frequently stay at our home Hilton resort but use the points to upgrade to a larger unit, view, or fewer days - no skim - points are points. As long as you pay your MF you are entitled to use them anywhere in the system.

Why do they do this? Why do they care?
They care because it improves their bottom line. There is also no skimming over at Diamond Resorts, BTW
 

EZ-ED

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
555
Reaction score
80
Location
ID
I don't get to TUG that often anymore so am still wading thru all the comments regarding the II takeover by Marriott but after 3 or so pages I am at a loss to understand what Marriott hopes to accomplish, and why Marriott competitors such as Hyatt, Hilton, Westgate, etc would remain a part of II thus giving Marriott access to competitor company inside information (owners, trades). I see no reason from these types to remain within II and would be alarmed that a competitor had access to such information. As yet I have not seen a good case for this sale from Marriott's point or what they hope to accomplish. I do not have a good feeling about this just as I did not see the advantage of adding my Marriott week to the DC program.
 

JIMinNC

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,938
Reaction score
4,534
Location
Marvin, NC (Charlotte) & Hilton Head Island, SC
Resorts Owned
Marriott:
Maui Ocean Club
Waiohai Beach Club
Barony Beach Club
Abound ClubPoints
HGVC:
HGVC at Sea World
I don't get to TUG that often anymore so am still wading thru all the comments regarding the II takeover by Marriott but after 3 or so pages I am at a loss to understand what Marriott hopes to accomplish, and why Marriott competitors such as Hyatt, Hilton, Westgate, etc would remain a part of II thus giving Marriott access to competitor company inside information (owners, trades). I see no reason from these types to remain within II and would be alarmed that a competitor had access to such information. As yet I have not seen a good case for this sale from Marriott's point or what they hope to accomplish. I do not have a good feeling about this just as I did not see the advantage of adding my Marriott week to the DC program.

Buying the II exchange company is not the primary motivation behind this deal for Marriott. This deal happened because ILG owns Westin Vacation Club and Sheraton Vacation Club through their previous acquisition of Vistana. They also own the Hyatt Residence Club. Marriott Vacations Worldwide wants these locations and sales centers to boost their sales and create operating efficiencies. The Interval International exchange business is just a bonus that offers good cash flow and profitability with little capital expenditures required.
 

Marathoner

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
815
Reaction score
524
Location
NYC
I don't get to TUG that often anymore so am still wading thru all the comments regarding the II takeover by Marriott but after 3 or so pages I am at a loss to understand what Marriott hopes to accomplish, and why Marriott competitors such as Hyatt, Hilton, Westgate, etc would remain a part of II thus giving Marriott access to competitor company inside information (owners, trades). I see no reason from these types to remain within II and would be alarmed that a competitor had access to such information. As yet I have not seen a good case for this sale from Marriott's point or what they hope to accomplish. I do not have a good feeling about this just as I did not see the advantage of adding my Marriott week to the DC program.

RCI is owned by Wyndham and soon, II will be owned by Marriott. So, you (e.g. Westgate, Hilton, Welk, etc) would be sending your customers to a potential competitor no matter which venue option you choose. It is also the case that in many industries, a company does business with a partner who has an affiliate which competes against you. As long as everyone's business conduct is professional, this works.

It is also the case that Marriott will want II revenues to grow and flourish. This will only happen by keeping II week owners satisfied with good exchanges and this can only happen if II courts and reassures member timeshare systems to continue to partner with II through good client service and transparency.
 

JIMinNC

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,938
Reaction score
4,534
Location
Marvin, NC (Charlotte) & Hilton Head Island, SC
Resorts Owned
Marriott:
Maui Ocean Club
Waiohai Beach Club
Barony Beach Club
Abound ClubPoints
HGVC:
HGVC at Sea World
It is also the case that in many industries, a company does business with a partner who has an affiliate which competes against you. As long as everyone's business conduct is professional, this works.

Excellent point - a perfect example is the smartphone business. Apple's biggest competitor for the iPhone is the Samsung Galaxy series of phones. But Samsung is also one of Apple's biggest suppliers of components for the iPhone - displays, chips, and other electronics. So Samsung and Apple work together to build the iPhone, but they also compete vigorously in the retail market.
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Lifetime Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
50,564
Reaction score
22,031
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
Under the VSE Flex model, it would seem that it would be much harder for them to get desirable weeks into the Flex (since those were all sold as deeded weeks), so if the high demand weeks aren't in the Flex, then what advantage is the 12 month booking vs booking at 8 months? Seems like even if you bought into Flex all the good stuff would still be at 8 months instead of 12 (if it wasn't all taken up by home resort owners). The MVC approach with the DC exchange seems like a much better way to get quality inventory available to the widest possible owner base. I recognize that VSE already had points, but if you have to wait until 8 months to book attractive weeks, I fail to see the appeal of Flex. The DC seems way more owner-friendly and an easier sell - even though it's still pricey. So, DC seems pricey but with good utility/usability; Flex seems pricey with questionable usability.
This is the big problem with Flex and why it a lot of people don't like it. It is good for booking properties in the trust, but you can't go outside of that for peak season weeks since those are usually booked by owners long before the eight month mark. Vistana also messed up and fragmented their trusts, which makes it harder to bring it all back together.
 
Top