What if, as the majority owners, Wyndham votes to end the property as a timeshare, tear it down and build something much more profitable? The minority owners would only get a token reimbursement.
Denise - I think it's possible that you might be underestimating the hurdles associated with development of a new project in Kaua'i, especially an ocean front site. And especially if such a project is going to result in an increase in tourism. I perceive a substantial local sentiment that Kaua'i is beyond max capacity with tourists, and projects that would add to that load have significant difficulty.
For at least 15 years Diamond has been trying to create a new building somewhere in Hawaii, with no success. If you are familiar with the Kona area, there is property on Alii Drive next to Kona Reef, which for years has been the foundation for an uncompleted building. They acquired some type of interest in that property, with the intent to complete a new project on a parcel that was already zoned for a new project, had been issued (now-expired) permits, and is an eye-sore. They weren't able to do it. Ultimately, they resorted to acquiring the Modern property in Waikiki, which was an existing building.
For years various people have been trying to do something with the CoCo Palms property, to no avail. (And I recognize there are some cultural clashes with that project.)
And should a tear-down rebuild project gain traction at the KBV site, I'm sure that opposing groups could find some cultural issue associated with the site that would suffice to mothball the project.
The only near ocean projects that seem to get permitted on Kaua'i there days are subdivision projects. Most resort and condo projects are mauka. But with restrictions on short-term rentals, that means those properties are being sold to individual owners who will occupy the units, whether full time or part time (with a limited amount of black market short-term rental).