They would IMO simply foreclose on the week. Once the state, the resort, and the new buyer have accepted the new buyer as the owner I can't imagine anyone other than a lawyer who is on the board investigating the deed as a favor. The resort will not spend the time or money researching previously recorded deeds on deliquent accounts. They will place collections on the person who they show to be an owner, when that person doesn't pay they will foreclose on the week and the association will own it. If they wanted to revert to the prior owner they would be in a sticky situation for allowing someone to use and pay MF's on a week they now say they didn't own for a year or years.
The reason why people want the cheapest transfer is because they are transferring weeks selling for $1. Who wants to pay $300 to $900 to transfer a deed on a week that sold for $100 or less? On a home or any VALUABLE property I would never consider using an unknow closing service and I would demand a title search. For a week purchased for $1, a hundred dollar closing is about as high as I want to go. I can call the resort and see if there are any back dues owed, any liens, check with the county to make sure it in not in collections and foreclosure, and buy it feeling pretty sure everything is OK. If it is not OK I don't own the week and I can buy another one for $1.
I sure don't want to pay $300 to $900 to transfer a week I am selling for $1. I will probably sell a few this year for little or nothing even though I have already paid the 2012 MF's. After paying $600 to $900 MF's for my 2012 week the new owner will get use of I do not want to make my loss bigger by paying a high closing fee.
Now if the resorts are going to start researching deed transfers and nullify some, I sure hope that some of the weeks I am trying to sell will be some weeks that were tranferred incorrectly.
Actually our law firm does timeshare foreclosures. And no, if the deed does not transfer title completely, as in the examples above, the rule is you name everyone that has held title back to a good title. That is the policy wether it is a timeshare or a million dollar house.
So while tombo transferred title to jimbo and the title contained a defect and did not legally transfer title and 5 years from now, Jimbo quits paying his maintenance fees and the Association goes to foreclose and they turn it over to the attorney, when title search is done AND the deed was not sufficent to pass title to Jimbo, both Tombo and Jimbo will be named in the foreclosure in order to make sure all parties having an interest or appearing to have an interest are named so that at the conclusion of the foreclosure title is clear again.
So, tell me, is it worth that risk down the road that the deadbeat Jimbo, just put a foreclosure on your public records section of your credit report.
Never once have I or the others said don't go the cheapest route, many lawyers prepare deeds all day long for $100 to $150. All that has been said and continues to be said, the out of state companies that do not follow the laws in what they do are not necessiarly the people that should be trying to pass title. Title work is not a one size fits all and the actual forms and the actual teancy varies greatly in how it is done.
I think that has been the whole exercise here, but people seem to think because the county recorded it and the resort accepted it, it must be good.
A good friend of mine runs the recording division in Orange County is the first to say, WE ARE NOT THE DOCUMENT POLICE. If the document is recordable (usually notaorized) and the money is correct we put a nice little sticker on it and tell you to have a nice day.
From the Counties perspective, they are not attorneys and can not render an opinion if your deed did what it was intended to do. While that is the policy in all of Florida many states share the same belief, if I can record it and the money is right it is recorded.
By the same token, the resort only knows they need a deed that has a recording stamp. If it has that, then they do the transfer. Again, they can not render an opinion of title that it did what was intended.
Herein lies everyones misconception.