
Doubts About Contact Tracing | The Daily Economy
“Contact tracing might make sense for certain diseases. But it turns out that there is no evidence that this novel coronavirus can be contained by contact t ...

... I would think the time and effort invested in contact tracing would be better invested toward more testing - create even more testing centers, increase test processing capability, expand test center hours - etc.
But some say that if we did less testing, there'd be less COVID-19. [/Satire]
But some say that if we did less testing, there'd be less COVID-19. [/Satire]
I agree with this idea entirely, but is there truly a practical, efficient and accurate manner in which to measure and perform tracing in areas where you come into contact with higher numbers of people? I still suggest the money being put toward contact tracing would be better spent toward testing. But just for grins, I was thinking about yesterday when I had to make a trip to town and if I had to recount the interactions I had, could I accurately do that?If someone I've been in contact with contracts the virus I would want to be contacted so that I would be vigilant in case I contract it and if so I can contact those with whom I've been in contact to let them know they might contract it..
Four of my sisters friends had it and it wasn’t pleasant. Her neighbors nephew 30’s passed away from it with no pre existing conditions.From what I understand, it is only considered "contact" if you spent 15+ minutes with a person. Anyone else hear it this way? If that is the case, I could do a better job making a list of my contacts. And yes, I would alter my behavior if told I had been in contact with someone who tested positive.I
As of today, in my world, I do not know anyone who has tested positive.
And I do not know anyone who knows anyone who has tested positive.
Third party stories are the closest I have come -- and I am grateful.
And I have two friends who have lost parents.From what I understand, it is only considered "contact" if you spent 15+ minutes with a person. Anyone else hear it this way? If that is the case, I could do a better job making a list of my contacts. And yes, I would alter my behavior if told I had been in contact with someone who tested positive.I
As of today, in my world, I do not know anyone who has tested positive.
And I do not know anyone who knows anyone who has tested positive.
Third party stories are the closest I have come -- and I am grateful.
I think when it affects your family or someone you know, the severity is real, and Cannot be ignored.And I have two friends who have lost parents.
I understand concerns about scammers. They are rampant. But if I got a phone call like this, I would go get tested. I don't see how a scammer would benefit from that.I just saw a report on CNN that indicated when you get the phone call notifying you that you have been named as someone a covid positive patient has come in contact with, and of course the first thing you ask is "who have I been in contact with?", the answer is "we can't tell you because of privacy rules". My response would be "click". You can't tell me who I might have come in contact with, I automatically classify you as a phone scammer.
Was she tested?My daughters two best friends (who are 17 YO twins) had C19. Both very mild symptoms. My daughter was with both of them the day before they tested positive. She's fine.
Twice . And so was I.Was she tested?
lol, maybe just a stalkerI understand concerns about scammers. They are rampant. But if I got a phone call like this, I would go get tested. I don't see how a scammer would benefit from that.
They should consider hiring those who are set to work as Census takers. That number is staggering.N.Y.C. Hired 3,000 Workers for Contact Tracing. It’s Off to a Slow Start.
![]()
N.Y.C. Hired 3,000 Workers for Contact Tracing. It’s Off to a Slow Start. (Published 2020)
The program is crucial to the next phase of reopening, which begins on Monday. But workers have not had much success in getting information from people who test positive.www.nytimes.com