Thank goodness Humor out'covers' both of them- at least on TUG!IMHO, this thread shows that COVID coverage is not greater than airplane-crash coverage.
I don't want to give this thread more attention that it has already had over the years, but riddle me this: After all this time, is it realistic to expect the wreckage will be intact? Jets are pretty fragile things, compared with ships. Presuming it suffered some structural damage on impact, isn't it likely things have been spread out by now, and a single site doesn't really exist?
Dave
yeah, likely just the engines and parts of the fuselage remaining.
dammit ... I added to this thread
IMHO, it is time to closed this mystery case and let the passengers and airline crew RIP.
I agree. When there is any real news, the press will tell us.IMHO, it is time to closed this mystery case and let the passengers and airline crew RIP.
Behind a paywall for Me too. All I could read was this one sentence - "MH370: New debris fnd onIt is. What does it say?
Dave
They want a buck a day for access. If it's THAT informative, it will show up elsewhere.Behind a paywall for Me too. All I could read was this one sentence - "MH370: New debris fnd on
Antsiraka Peninsula South Beach sheds light on flight's final moments"
Richard
If the Gear was extended above the limit speed for extension or retraction, the Gear doors would have likely departed the aircraft. They are not designed to withstand the cruise speeds while open. The Gear themselves are pretty beefy but who knows what a 500+ MPH breeze would do to the linkages, etc.The gist is that the landing gear was extended upon impact. A related question, not addressed at all in the article and likely unknowable, is at what point during flight would the landing gear have been extended. Suppose the landing gear had been extended for much of the flight. Wouldn't that increase the fuel consumption - meaning the plane would have flown as far before crashing as has been assumed when selecting search areas?