I hate to write this, but you really don't know what you're saying.
Sent from my iPad
In light of the inevitable debacle? OK-my language was a little strong. Maybe there was a better way of putting it.
People who invested in Bitcoins did so ignoring or in spite of the obvious risks of placing money in an untested, unregulated, currency that might be easily and secretly manipulated by unknown players anywhere in the world. Money that might be easily stolen because it might be placed in the hands of untested and unknown people and organizations. It has obvious allure for criminal and other dark operations. Some will say "any currency is subject to manipulation etc. etc." Currency trading in real recognized, tested, currency is regulated all over the world and there are criminal law enforcement people all over the world ready to step in to find those who violate law, or regulation. Not so much for Bitcoin.
To quote from the article of mr. Manjoo, cited above:
"But the comparison between Citigroup’s loss and the fall of Mt. Gox highlights just how unusual and untamable digital currency can be. When scandal engulfs traditional financial institutions like Citigroup, there are investigations and calls for greater oversight — human oversight. Bitcoin, though, was born of mistrust of humans and their institutions. It rests on the belief that financial safety emerges from the integrity of the technology, a computer code that controls a payment system, rather than the trustworthiness of the humans who participate in it.
To save their nascent currency, Bitcoin’s backers may be forced to alter their philosophy and embrace the same messy humans — auditors, insurers and even regulators — that the currency’s most ardent supporters have long abhorred. This raises two difficult questions: Can human oversight integrate into Bitcoin’s free-for-all ethos quickly enough to render Bitcoin safe? And, can Bitcoin be made safer without tamping down on the very openness that proponents say makes Bitcoin such a cheap, efficient and innovative financial platform? At the moment, the answers are still very much up in the air.
"