• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

[2008] Sandcastle Shift to "Festiva" Points [merged]

HI- do you have us listed? A. Stoll & P. Clapham, week 33.
Thanks
Anita

Anita ...

This is the information (in the previous post) you will need to access this group of owners. I don't know of any other groups like ours. This list has been growing since the annual meeting in April. Not being allowed access to the owners list (despite MA General Laws stating otherwise) we are trying to contact owners and gather names and email address anyway we can. Beryl Soparkar maintains the list so that is why you will have to contact her.

Hope this helps.
 
Advisory board

Does anyone know who's on the advisory committee that to my knowledge was supposed to be meeting today? Please review the info above, since my intent is to bump this up to the top of the page!
According to NEVMSLLC [Post 756702] there was supposed to be an advisory board "that will be made up of individual owners" which will "review all information before it is presented to the trustees and will have direct input for recommendations to the trustees" and should have been appointed in August. Has this promise been kept? What can you Sandcastle owners tell us Southcape Owners about the Sandcastle "advisory board"?
 
Owners Advisory Committee

According to NEVMSLLC [Post 756702] there was supposed to be an advisory board "that will be made up of individual owners" which will "review all information before it is presented to the trustees and will have direct input for recommendations to the trustees" and should have been appointed in August. Has this promise been kept? What can you Sandcastle owners tell us Southcape Owners about the Sandcastle "advisory board"?

The Sandcastle OAC met on September 26th at the Sandcastle. From what I understand there were 6 chosen members and 3 physically attended the meeting and 1 attended via computer (like a net meeting, I think), and 2 were 'no shows'. We have had a couple of reports .. not too much for 2010 was reviewed as far as I could read ... it was more questions from the owners and answers from Cliff and Tom Franks of Outfield Marketing (both are on the Board of Trustees).

Following is a report that was sent to our owners e-list:

Board of Trustees Members Present…Cliff Hagberg, Tom Franks(also Outfield Marketing Partner)

Owners present…Marie Caniglia-Robiolio, Chuck Hazard, Ernie Pergano, Paul Lehrman present via webcam/video conference on laptop…two other owners dropped out.


My questions are italicized. Both Cliff and Tom gave answers to the questions. I did not indiacte who answered what in many cases.


Why did you fail to give the owner’s list to owners who asked to see it?
Cliff’s response was that there are two conflicting laws…one stating we the owners have a right to see the list and the other is the Privacy Act stating it is illegal to give out private information.


Cliff’s attorneys said he would be/ could be sued either way. If he doesn’t give it up he could be sued by the owners for not complying with the law requiring him to do so or he could be sued by someone who got hurt because of the information he gave out. There is a liability here because privacy is compromised. He was advised by his lawyer not to give it out because there is a greater liability in this situation. Someone could be stalked, hurt in some way, bothered by someone who got a hold of that list. He stated it is a responsibility as a trustee to reduce liability and that meant not giving out the owners’ private information. He did state the privacy law number but I was unable to write the number down. Anyone can look it up.


Did you know there was a deficit when you purchased the inventory? They knew there was a deficit but had no idea it was so huge.

You didn’t get a reduced price from the old Trustees on the inventory you bought because of the deficit or the condition of the resort did you? They laughed…NOOO


Why the 26% increase in the 2009 maintenance fees? To cover all the expenses and balance the budget except for the $350,000 shortfall which would be covered by the assessment.


The budget is now balanced.


Do you anticipate the maintenance fees will go up annually? Yes, because all things get more expensive each year, but will not go up anywhere near 26%


Will all financial records be available for owners to view? Yes, on an individual basis, just call the office and let them know in advance when you are coming.


Will you be going after owners who do not pay their Maintenace fees and assessments? Yes, they will go after all the money first, then try for half. If they are unable to get anything, and since it is too expensive to forclose, they will go after it by something called “Entry and Possession” They will go in the room the week the owner is supposed to be there and follow a certain procedure which I will have to get more info on. I didn’t write it all down and I can’t remember the procedure but ultimately the title will revert back to the association. The week can then be sold and it’s the association’s money.


Cliff, did you pay your maintenance fees on your personal week? No, I was unaware that I didn’t pay it until Debbie told me I didn’t pay them this year.

How could you let that happen? It just slipped my mind.

Do you plan on paying them? And any late fee? yes

And are you going to pay the assessment? yes


Cliff did you convert your week to points? No

Do you plan on it? No, I have RCI points.


Will you be taking weeks back? If all maintenance fees are paid and there are extenuating circumstances they will consider it. The title will revert back to the association. They generally will not take weeks back.


If the developer has a week for rent and an owner has a week they want the resort to rent…who gets priority? The developer’s week will get priority because all the money from developer’s weeks that are rented goes to the association as per developer agreement.


The 25% fee that the resort charges to rent an owner’s week also goes to the association as per developer agreement.


I asked about a trust issue we could possibly have since all this is going on? How will we, the owners know that all income is being reported, especially owners’ weeks that are left to be rented out by the resort? They could potentially be occupied by outfield sales people or free night promotional give aways. How will the owners ever know.? It is a trust issue and there has to be some amount of trust. Plus there are maid reports and registry documents that can be seen, and there is always a chance an owner will call their room on their week to be rented and if someone answers the phone after they were told its not been rented…well there is going to trouble and they/ NEVS doesn’t need that or want that trouble.


Well you do know there are big trust issues right now, so trust is hard at this point. You understand? Yes but we have nothing to hide.




********Why doesn’t the developer pay fees and assessments on his unsold inventory? The prior developers didn’t .

So what does that have to do with you as the developer now… The bank would not finance the deal unless the declarent was not responsible for the maintenance fees.

********This is one of the issues that I need to get clarification on. I am not satisfied with their answer at this time and Cliff had issues about discussing it.


Questions about Festiva


Does/Will Festiva pay maintenance fees and assessment? Yes

Will Festiva have voting rights to the units they hold deeds to? Yes

Can/will Festiva have control if they get 51% of the resort? Yes, but it is virtually impossible for Festiva to get 51% based upon the fact that there are 4000 owners. That would mean more than half would have to turn over their weeks. And they also can not take over no matter what percentage they own as long a NEVS is the developer, for contractual reasons.


Cliff and Tom both said there won’t be any issues if the owners make sure they all vote.


I mentioned about the lack of trust we have at this point and not having transparency…

I said there needs to be a way to show that you NEVS/Outfield have nothing to hide. Wouldn’t it be a smart thing to do to let one of the owners be on the Board of Trustees?
Cliff and Tom made a call to another Trustee and decided it would be a good idea to have the owners elects one owner to be on the Board of Trustees.


Cliff and Tom will soon be sending out notices stating the duties and responsibilities of the Trustee and will ask for candidates to submit resumes for owners to review and then an election will be held. Details will follow.



Questions about Outfield Marketing


I mentioned to Tom Franks who is not only a Board of Trustee member, but he is one of the 3 partners in Outfield, that there were so many issues with Outfield and that the owners had been told such as outright lies. I listed several which were told to me directly. He said he was unaware of the complaints as he had not heard from any owners. He did say that some of the original sales people that went to people’s homes were fired for various reasons. Please call them with any Outfield issues.


Is Outfield getting paid by Festiva to sell points? Tom was evasive but I believe after I asked several times he finally said yes.

********I asked how much Outfield got out of the $3000 that Festiva charges? NEVS gets about 50%

********So what does Sandcastle get out of it? We get maintenance fee paying owners.

********I have issues with this answer. Not too happy about it.


Where do the Outfield salespeople stay when here at the resort? In developer units, however, if they stay in an owners rooms they will pay for it.

Does Outfield pay for expenses? Yes, they even have a separate phone bill that they pay but they also have an agreement with the developer.



Cliff is any member of your family involved in the renovations? No

But doesn’t your brother work here as a maintenance man? Yes, but not on renovations


I did mention the fact that Cliff himself said his brother was a master carpenter and that Cliff said his brother was going to do some work on cabinets and furniture to save the resort some money. Cliff agreed with that statement.


I asked about the annex and I asked if the rooms there were going to be rented and how much we could expect…Cliff said that he expects $50,000 -$70,000 per year. About $65 per night. The rents go to the association.



I asked if the rooms were going to be used as free promo nights for outfield marketing ? yes they could be and if they were Outfield would pay for the rooms out of their pockets.


Cliff will be choosing two additional people to be on the advisory board. It will meet about 4 times a year. More details to follow.


I had a question about the assessment fees…if you agreed to pay installments and you are late a few days, they will not charge a late fee and void the installment deal.


Cliff did say that if anyone put anything on their check such as “paying under protest” the checks will be returned as funds not available or something to that effect. And he will then charge you a late fee. There is no escrow fund and the demand letters according to Cliff do not mean a thing.


Cliff and Tom did say that some financial issues and other issues are developer issues and have nothing to do with the association.


I hope I did not leave anything out. If I did I will send the additional notes.
 
"I mentioned to Tom Franks who is not only a Board of Trustee member, but he is one of the 3 partners in Outfield, that there were so many issues with Outfield and that the owners had been told such as outright lies. I listed several which were told to me directly. He said he was unaware of the complaints as he had not heard from any owners. He did say that some of the original sales people that went to people’s homes were fired for various reasons. Please call them with any Outfield issues."

This is a lie, I sent a letter of demand to C. Hagberg with specific complaints about Outfield; he responded that he was forwarding my complaints to Outfield. I NEVER heard from Outfield. So who is lying?
 
"I mentioned to Tom Franks who is not only a Board of Trustee member, but he is one of the 3 partners in Outfield, that there were so many issues with Outfield and that the owners had been told such as outright lies. I listed several which were told to me directly. He said he was unaware of the complaints as he had not heard from any owners. He did say that some of the original sales people that went to people’s homes were fired for various reasons. Please call them with any Outfield issues."

This is a lie, I sent a letter of demand to C. Hagberg with specific complaints about Outfield; he responded that he was forwarding my complaints to Outfield. I NEVER heard from Outfield. So who is lying?

Cliff has said that he reported to Outfield about the complaints and that they fired some, hired new and Outfield sent people to train the new salesmen. If that was the truth then Tom Franks lied, or maybe he is being kept in the dark.

Personally, I don't think they would know the truth if it came up and bit them in their backsides. Their idea of truth is probably anything that is beneficial to them and only them.

I just sat through another meeting with Outfield Marketing ... with a trainee. Not the high pressure, in your face, insulting and demoralizing presentation that I experienced last year, but there were blatant untruths. Could tell he was being very cautious and he even mentioned the complaints received from owners about other salespeople. So if a trainee knows about the problems, how can Tom Franks be so uninformed?
 
Correction to this report

The Sandcastle OAC met on September 26th at the Sandcastle. From what I understand there were 6 chosen members and 3 physically attended the meeting and 1 attended via computer (like a net meeting, I think), and 2 were 'no shows'. We have had a couple of reports .. not too much for 2010 was reviewed as far as I could read ... it was more questions from the owners and answers from Cliff and Tom Franks of Outfield Marketing (both are on the Board of Trustees).

Following is a report that was sent to our owners e-list:

Board of Trustees Members Present…Cliff Hagberg, Tom Franks(also Outfield Marketing Partner)

Owners present…Marie Caniglia-Robiolio, Chuck Hazard, Ernie Pergano, Paul Lehrman present via webcam/video conference on laptop…two other owners dropped out.


My questions are italicized. Both Cliff and Tom gave answers to the questions. I did not indiacte who answered what in many cases.


Why did you fail to give the owner’s list to owners who asked to see it?
Cliff’s response was that there are two conflicting laws…one stating we the owners have a right to see the list and the other is the Privacy Act stating it is illegal to give out private information.


Cliff’s attorneys said he would be/ could be sued either way. If he doesn’t give it up he could be sued by the owners for not complying with the law requiring him to do so or he could be sued by someone who got hurt because of the information he gave out. There is a liability here because privacy is compromised. He was advised by his lawyer not to give it out because there is a greater liability in this situation. Someone could be stalked, hurt in some way, bothered by someone who got a hold of that list. He stated it is a responsibility as a trustee to reduce liability and that meant not giving out the owners’ private information. He did state the privacy law number but I was unable to write the number down. Anyone can look it up.


Did you know there was a deficit when you purchased the inventory? They knew there was a deficit but had no idea it was so huge.

You didn’t get a reduced price from the old Trustees on the inventory you bought because of the deficit or the condition of the resort did you? They laughed…NOOO


Why the 26% increase in the 2009 maintenance fees? To cover all the expenses and balance the budget except for the $350,000 shortfall which would be covered by the assessment.


The budget is now balanced.


Do you anticipate the maintenance fees will go up annually? Yes, because all things get more expensive each year, but will not go up anywhere near 26%


Will all financial records be available for owners to view? Yes, on an individual basis, just call the office and let them know in advance when you are coming.


Will you be going after owners who do not pay their Maintenace fees and assessments? Yes, they will go after all the money first, then try for half. If they are unable to get anything, and since it is too expensive to forclose, they will go after it by something called “Entry and Possession” They will go in the room the week the owner is supposed to be there and follow a certain procedure which I will have to get more info on. I didn’t write it all down and I can’t remember the procedure but ultimately the title will revert back to the association. The week can then be sold and it’s the association’s money.


Cliff, did you pay your maintenance fees on your personal week? No, I was unaware that I didn’t pay it until Debbie told me I didn’t pay them this year.

How could you let that happen? It just slipped my mind.

Do you plan on paying them? And any late fee? yes

And are you going to pay the assessment? yes


Cliff did you convert your week to points? No

Do you plan on it? No, I have RCI points.


Will you be taking weeks back? If all maintenance fees are paid and there are extenuating circumstances they will consider it. The title will revert back to the association. They generally will not take weeks back.


If the developer has a week for rent and an owner has a week they want the resort to rent…who gets priority? The developer’s week will get priority because all the money from developer’s weeks that are rented goes to the association as per developer agreement.


The 25% fee that the resort charges to rent an owner’s week also goes to the association as per developer agreement.


I asked about a trust issue we could possibly have since all this is going on? How will we, the owners know that all income is being reported, especially owners’ weeks that are left to be rented out by the resort? They could potentially be occupied by outfield sales people or free night promotional give aways. How will the owners ever know.? It is a trust issue and there has to be some amount of trust. Plus there are maid reports and registry documents that can be seen, and there is always a chance an owner will call their room on their week to be rented and if someone answers the phone after they were told its not been rented…well there is going to trouble and they/ NEVS doesn’t need that or want that trouble.


Well you do know there are big trust issues right now, so trust is hard at this point. You understand? Yes but we have nothing to hide.




********Why doesn’t the developer pay fees and assessments on his unsold inventory? The prior developers didn’t .

So what does that have to do with you as the developer now… The bank would not finance the deal unless the declarent was not responsible for the maintenance fees.

********This is one of the issues that I need to get clarification on. I am not satisfied with their answer at this time and Cliff had issues about discussing it.


Questions about Festiva


Does/Will Festiva pay maintenance fees and assessment? Yes

Will Festiva have voting rights to the units they hold deeds to? Yes

Can/will Festiva have control if they get 51% of the resort? Yes, but it is virtually impossible for Festiva to get 51% based upon the fact that there are 4000 owners. That would mean more than half would have to turn over their weeks. And they also can not take over no matter what percentage they own as long a NEVS is the developer, for contractual reasons.


Cliff and Tom both said there won’t be any issues if the owners make sure they all vote.


I mentioned about the lack of trust we have at this point and not having transparency…

I said there needs to be a way to show that you NEVS/Outfield have nothing to hide. Wouldn’t it be a smart thing to do to let one of the owners be on the Board of Trustees?
Cliff and Tom made a call to another Trustee and decided it would be a good idea to have the owners elects one owner to be on the Board of Trustees.


Cliff and Tom will soon be sending out notices stating the duties and responsibilities of the Trustee and will ask for candidates to submit resumes for owners to review and then an election will be held. Details will follow.



Questions about Outfield Marketing


I mentioned to Tom Franks who is not only a Board of Trustee member, but he is one of the 3 partners in Outfield, that there were so many issues with Outfield and that the owners had been told such as outright lies. I listed several which were told to me directly. He said he was unaware of the complaints as he had not heard from any owners. He did say that some of the original sales people that went to people’s homes were fired for various reasons. Please call them with any Outfield issues.


Is Outfield getting paid by Festiva to sell points? Tom was evasive but I believe after I asked several times he finally said yes.

********I asked how much Outfield got out of the $3000 that Festiva charges? NEVS gets about 50%

********So what does Sandcastle get out of it? We get maintenance fee paying owners.

********I have issues with this answer. Not too happy about it.


Where do the Outfield salespeople stay when here at the resort? In developer units, however, if they stay in an owners rooms they will pay for it.

Does Outfield pay for expenses? Yes, they even have a separate phone bill that they pay but they also have an agreement with the developer.



Cliff is any member of your family involved in the renovations? No

But doesn’t your brother work here as a maintenance man? Yes, but not on renovations


I did mention the fact that Cliff himself said his brother was a master carpenter and that Cliff said his brother was going to do some work on cabinets and furniture to save the resort some money. Cliff agreed with that statement.


I asked about the annex and I asked if the rooms there were going to be rented and how much we could expect…Cliff said that he expects $50,000 -$70,000 per year. About $65 per night. The rents go to the association.



I asked if the rooms were going to be used as free promo nights for outfield marketing ? yes they could be and if they were Outfield would pay for the rooms out of their pockets.


Cliff will be choosing two additional people to be on the advisory board. It will meet about 4 times a year. More details to follow.


I had a question about the assessment fees…if you agreed to pay installments and you are late a few days, they will not charge a late fee and void the installment deal.


Cliff did say that if anyone put anything on their check such as “paying under protest” the checks will be returned as funds not available or something to that effect. And he will then charge you a late fee. There is no escrow fund and the demand letters according to Cliff do not mean a thing.


Cliff and Tom did say that some financial issues and other issues are developer issues and have nothing to do with the association.


I hope I did not leave anything out. If I did I will send the additional notes.

I received an email from the author of this report, correcting the verbage regarding the checks received as payment of or on the Special Assessment bill. The author wrote:

I believe I wrote an e-mail after the one you are referring to, correcting myself, that is wasn't the words "paying under protest" that was an issue...it was the fact that there was/is no escrow account for those funds to be placed into. Since there was no escrow account he could not accept the money under those terms...making the funds not available to him. I don't have CLiff's exact response in front of me...but that is what I recall.
 
My check was cashed with the words "paying under protest" on it.
 
Cliff has said that he reported to Outfield about the complaints and that they fired some, hired new and Outfield sent people to train the new salesmen. If that was the truth then Tom Franks lied, or maybe he is being kept in the dark.

Personally, I don't think they would know the truth if it came up and bit them in their backsides. Their idea of truth is probably anything that is beneficial to them and only them.

I just sat through another meeting with Outfield Marketing ... with a trainee. Not the high pressure, in your face, insulting and demoralizing presentation that I experienced last year, but there were blatant untruths. Could tell he was being very cautious and he even mentioned the complaints received from owners about other salespeople. So if a trainee knows about the problems, how can Tom Franks be so uninformed?

This claim of "Gee, that's the first I've heard of this" has been going on for years from Festiva on...Cliff has been claiming it's a rarity ever since he was on this board. Go back and read his posts. These trainees don't come to this job making this stuff up and then sounding like a chorus of parrots...same claims over and over again...someone is training them in these claims. There is A LOT of money at stake here...millions in loans against both properties and 50% of each conversion going to NEVS...follow the money and you have the incentive for "blantant untruths".
 
Last edited:
Is Outfield getting paid by Festiva to sell points? [/I]Tom was evasive but I believe after I asked several times he finally said yes.

********I asked how much Outfield got out of the $3000 that Festiva charges? NEVS gets about 50%

QUOTE]

How this is not a HUGE conflict of interest is beyond the capacity of any rational mind to comprehend...where is the "trust" in trustees who are getting 50% of a conversion that at a minimum runs $3000? These are not trustees according to any traditional HOA defintion. They are people who are making a lot of money to push a point conversion scheme and appear to be fighting tooth and nail for the right to stop anyone from interfering with their efforts.
 
Check returned

My check for the first payment of the Special Assessment was returned. Cliff won't cash a check with any conditions attached. There is no legal judgement directing him to deposit the monies so the letters serve only as an opinion of the payor. Cliff likes to flex his muscles.
 
Who is lying?

Tom Franks knows nothing about any problems with Outfield sales personnel. Cliff has reported the problems to Outfield and trouble makers have been removed, new salespeople are trained and in place. Terry, the Outfield trainee, has been told about problems with sales people.

I was subjected to the ordeal of the Greg Hughes selling technique a year ago. Lies, half truths, exaggerations, threats, high pressure and fear. He left the resort, only to be replaced with a clone.

This year I got a trainee. According to Terry, the trainee, NEVS is part of Festiva Adventure Group. Really? Hmmm. Cliff says they are not associated in anyway. Asked Terry about that statement and he repeated himself. Brought it up again and the answer was the same for the third time. Well, son of a gun!

I did learn something new ... that when an owner turns the deed over to Festiva the owner's name stays on the deed. Really? Hmmmm. I asked, 'it does?' Yes said Terry, the trainee. It stays on the deed even though it is deposited into a Trust. I ask ... So, does that mean that if I quit the FAC organization that I get my deed back? Terry, the trainee, changed the subject. Reality ... When the deed is registered the name on it is Intercity Escrow Services ... for Festiva. That is the owner of that deed.

Some things just don't change.
 
Tom Franks knows nothing about any problems with Outfield sales personnel. Cliff has reported the problems to Outfield and trouble makers have been removed, new salespeople are trained and in place. Terry, the Outfield trainee, has been told about problems with sales people.

I was subjected to the ordeal of the Greg Hughes selling technique a year ago. Lies, half truths, exaggerations, threats, high pressure and fear. He left the resort, only to be replaced with a clone.

This year I got a trainee. According to Terry, the trainee, NEVS is part of Festiva Adventure Group. Really? Hmmm. Cliff says they are not associated in anyway. Asked Terry about that statement and he repeated himself. Brought it up again and the answer was the same for the third time. Well, son of a gun!

I did learn something new ... that when an owner turns the deed over to Festiva the owner's name stays on the deed. Really? Hmmmm. I asked, 'it does?' Yes said Terry, the trainee. It stays on the deed even though it is deposited into a Trust. I ask ... So, does that mean that if I quit the FAC organization that I get my deed back? Terry, the trainee, changed the subject. Reality ... When the deed is registered the name on it is Intercity Escrow Services ... for Festiva. That is the owner of that deed.

Some things just don't change.

Do you know Tom Franks knows nothing of the problems with Outfield Marketing or is that what he says? If I recall correctly, Outfield Marketing is no longer allowed to sell for Festiva on any of their Festiva properties and has been stopped from making at home calls...this all came about when Festiva was being investigated by the NC AG. As Outfield must have brought in huge profits for Festiva, one has to imagine how bad things got in the sales tactics arena that necessitated cutting ties with Outfield. Are you aware that Tom Franks has been cited by the FCC in regards to marketing timeshares?
 
Where are you people in getting legal help to get your membership list that you are entitled to by law and Cliff is stonewalling on, so that you can properly organize to fight these slugs and alert owners about the Festiva ripoff? The courts in California have ruled that similar stonewalling by Worldmark was ''unreasonable and unlawful''.

As to Outfield, it seems to require lies and misrepresentations to push the murky world of points.
 
Do you know Tom Franks knows nothing of the problems with Outfield Marketing or is that what he says? If I recall correctly, Outfield Marketing is no longer allowed to sell for Festiva on any of their Festiva properties and has been stopped from making at home calls...this all came about when Festiva was being investigated by the NC AG. As Outfield must have brought in huge profits for Festiva, one has to imagine how bad things got in the sales tactics arena that necessitated cutting ties with Outfield. Are you aware that Tom Franks has been cited by the FCC in regards to marketing timeshares?

That is what Tom Franks said at the OAC meeting. I questioned whether Cliff was sitting there and did Cliff correct Tom. After all, Cliff did tell us that he notified Outfield of the problems with their staff.

Fig, do you honestly think for one minute I believe anything coming out of the mouth of any Outfield employee or Cliff Hagberg? People who consistently lie, speak half-truths and fabricate don't get a vote of confidence from me.
 
That is what Tom Franks said at the OAC meeting. I questioned whether Cliff was sitting there and did Cliff correct Tom. After all, Cliff did tell us that he notified Outfield of the problems with their staff.

Fig, do you honestly think for one minute I believe anything coming out of the mouth of any Outfield employee or Cliff Hagberg? People who consistently lie, speak half-truths and fabricate don't get a vote of confidence from me.

Understood...irony doesn't always translate as smoothly on BBs. Outfield Marketing is a strange thing...a CEO who lives 1300 miles from his legal office, a tiny shack in a run down section of Denton, TX, people doing business with these folks for years who can't supply a valid address....looking less and less like a bonafide "third-party business" as opposed to a convient arrangement on paper that allows Festiva to push its points scheme. Here's hoping your legal and "get the word out" efforts can help put a stop to this kind of stuff soon.
 
Do you know Tom Franks knows nothing of the problems with Outfield Marketing or is that what he says? If I recall correctly, Outfield Marketing is no longer allowed to sell for Festiva on any of their Festiva properties and has been stopped from making at home calls...this all came about when Festiva was being investigated by the NC AG. As Outfield must have brought in huge profits for Festiva, one has to imagine how bad things got in the sales tactics arena that necessitated cutting ties with Outfield. Are you aware that Tom Franks has been cited by the FCC in regards to marketing timeshares?[/QUOTE]

Hi Fig

Did you mean the FCC or the FTC is this statement? Couldn't find any related complaint on the internet.

Chris
 
Do you know Tom Franks knows nothing of the problems with Outfield Marketing or is that what he says? If I recall correctly, Outfield Marketing is no longer allowed to sell for Festiva on any of their Festiva properties and has been stopped from making at home calls...this all came about when Festiva was being investigated by the NC AG. As Outfield must have brought in huge profits for Festiva, one has to imagine how bad things got in the sales tactics arena that necessitated cutting ties with Outfield. Are you aware that Tom Franks has been cited by the FCC in regards to marketing timeshares?[/QUOTE]

Hi Fig

Did you mean the FCC or the FTC is this statement? Couldn't find any related complaint on the internet.

Chris

FCC...here it is. He was the Pres of a Resort that robocalled people's homes. The volume must have been pretty big to set off this kind of warning by the FCC. The claim by Cliff that he is protecting people by not letting fellow owners have a copy of the list is pretty bizarre when you figure he handed the list over to people who have violated FCC laws for marketing purposes. In the case of NEVS, the "marketing" even went further than repeated phone calls at dinner time as Outfield Marketing reps made their way into people's homes under the claim that they were "updating people" on changes at the resort. From things posted here and elsewhere there was very little updating going on but instead high pressured sales pitches to get people to hand over deeds for $3,000 a pop.

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/EB-02-TC-256.pdf

Festiva has stopped home visits to push points for properties. Perhaps the legal ramifications outweighed the benefits...who knows...the NC AG was probing Festiva when they decided to pull back on using Outfield Marketing. But neither property on the Cape is considered Festiva owned, so Cliff could give Outfield the list to market for as long as they wanted and that appears to be what is happening as NEVS makes 50% and the owner associaton grows weaker with every conversion. Again, these are not trustees in any traditional sense.
 
Last edited:
"Tracy Sparks"

I had a message left for me on my home telephone from a "Tracy Sparks" who left her # for me to return her call. The # is 561-255-9549 and the purpose of the call was to give me "inportant information" about my timeshare.

Of course I have no intention of returning that call but did save the message.

It now looks as though we may need to add the FCC to our list of agencies to which we need to be complaining. Thanks for the info, Fig!
 
Last edited:
Timesharing Today will be publishing another article, this time on the marketing and sales practices any of the owners experience IN THEIR HOMES.

They will need our help. This is what they are looking for:

They are planning a generic article about the sales tactics of developers going to the homes of owners and coercing them into converting them to points. The article won't give any names but will be descriptive of the methods used. Please let TimeSharing Today know what experiences of owners were without disclosing any personal or confidential information.

So, why are they doing all this picking and poking?

TimeSharing Today believes a storm is brewing in the timeshare industry. Owners are moving beyond just complaining; they are organizing in many areas of the country and internationally and have either already turned to the courts or are getting ready to do so. Attorneys General have undertaken action to curb scams. It is their belief that 2010 may prove to be an explosive year for timeshare litigation that will affect developers, owners associations, management companies and millions of owners. A multitude of owners are realizing that they have lost control. In some cases, they have learned that they never really had control. Owners are tired of being manipulated, coerced and lied to. Some of these allegations have already been made public in the courts, in print and on various online forums and blogs. The word is out and it won't go away.

TimeSharing Today is committed to covering all aspects of the industry. They have been publishing a lot of painful stories and have spoken directly to many concerned owners who are desperate for change in an industry that has so much good to offer but can't seem to effectively regulate itself. The courts may be their only source for relief. But, there are also so many happy tales. Perhaps, many more than the tales of conflict and abuse. Let's never overlook the positive side of vacation ownership. Let's work toward raising the level of good faith and fair dealing every timeshare owner deserves. If we're stuck to a contract of adhesion, let's work toward having that contract result in happy, carefree timeshare vacations.

Please email comments to: staff@tstoday.com Subject: The industry

Below is a special message to Sandcastle/Southcape owners whose plight has been published in TimeSharing Today:

TimeSharing Today Magazine has been publishing since 1991 as an independent voice for the owner. It recently announced enhanced services to be more proactive in advocating for the owners on the issues that many are facing. TimeSharing Today has begun supporting us by publishing our letter detailing the difficulties we are addressing and obtaining a response from the resort management. As we continue to seek greater owner control at our resort, TimeSharing Today will continue to support our efforts to create awareness. We ask that you show your support by subscribing to this important publication. Please use this link: https://tstoday.com/shop/freebonus.aspx?source=grp02
 
I had a message left for me on my home telephone from a "Tracy Sparks" who left her # for me to return her call. The # is 561-255-9549 and the purpose of the call was to give me "inportant information" about my timeshare.

Of course I have no intention of returning that call but did save the message.

It now looks as though we may need to add the FCC to our list of agencies to which we need to be complaining. Thanks for the info, Fig!

Since you own a timeshare, I think they can contact you as there is an existing business relationship. The robocalls for Silverleaf that Tom Franks was held accountable for I think were just random calls by machine. However, the claim that they are giving you "important information" is bogus...we all know this is a marketing call to try and get $3,000 out of you for a timeshare you own. That Cliff let people who have been cited by the FCC and also have been thrown out of houses in other states have access to owners kinda shows you how intent he is on protecting anyone. He and his Outfield Markeing friends took out a $2.5 million loan on these properties...this and this alone goes along way towards explaining why people are hearing so many lies. You can't sell points that nobody wants without streaching the truth. Trustees who make 50% on selling points at several thousand a pop and who have a $2.5 mortgage to pay at a time when timeshares are not selling have their priorties set for them. It seems to be playing out in the heavy handed push for points so many are complaining about. Hopefully, you can reach enough owners before too much is done to enrich these folks at your expense.
 
Where are you people in getting legal help to get your membership list that you are entitled to by law and Cliff is stonewalling on, so that you can properly organize to fight these slugs and alert owners about the Festiva ripoff? The courts in California have ruled that similar stonewalling by Worldmark was ''unreasonable and unlawful''.

As to Outfield, it seems to require lies and misrepresentations to push the murky world of points.

Just FYI - today the Court of Appeals in California in the WorldMark case lifted the stay that was preventing the release of the owner mailing list information. The only portion of the stay that they did not lift was regarding the e-mail addresses of the owners (most likely because the by-laws of WM do not specifically address that issue).
 
Just FYI - today the Court of Appeals in California in the WorldMark case lifted the stay that was preventing the release of the owner mailing list information. The only portion of the stay that they did not lift was regarding the e-mail addresses of the owners (most likely because the by-laws of WM do not specifically address that issue).

I grabbed this off another board.

10/14/2009

Order filed.

On March 20, 2009, this court entered a stay of the superior court's "Order Denying in Its Entirety Petitioner Worldmark, The Club's Application for Protective Order," filed on January 23, 2009, in Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 34-2008-00025130-CU-PT-GDS.

This court now modifies the stay to permit enforcement of the superior court's order except insofar as the superior court required that email addresses be subject to disclosure to members.

Pursuant to the modified stay, email addresses need not be disclosed pending further order of this court. In all other respects, the superior court's order compelling disclosure of membership information is now enforceable upon the terms described in the order. BLEASE, Acting P. J. (Si)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have any legal folks working on the case, you might want to pass it along as it appears very similar in that it was a violation of bylaws and an alleged attempt by Worldmark to control the board by not letting owners communicate with each other. In your case you have not only a developer controlling the board but also directly profiting from his control as he and the three other board members, who are part of a marketing organization pushing points on owners, are receiving 50% of the fee per owner conversion, which can be upwards of $3,000.
 
Last edited:
Letter from CAC, Inc.

I have received a letter from Paul Schrader, Executive Director of the Consumer Assistance Council, Inc. (CAC), Hyannis, MA. I quote:

Dear Ms. Gallant,

I am writing in response to the complaint you filed with the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office against Sandcastle Resort/Festiva/Outfield marketing. Your complaint was sent to the Cape Cod Consumer Assistance Council (CAC) to attempt mediation.

Despite our efforts, the CAC was unable to resolve your complaint through mediation. I have been asked to return Sandcastle Resort complaints to the Attorney General's Office for further review and consideration.

The Attorney General's staff may be back in touch with you if they require additional information. We understand that this is a difficult issue and we appreciate your bringing your concerns to our attention.

Sincerely,
Paul Schrader
Executive Director

One thing that has either been omitted, overlooked in the writing of this letter, or not included are our complaints against NEVS LLC and NEVMS LLC. Now the CAC and/or the AGs office may be including them under the Sandcastle Resort name but I raise the question because I never filed a complaint against the Sandcastle Resort. I consider the resort itself separate from NEVS and NEVSMS about whom I filed complaints.

My concerns now are that these complaints will get lost in the AG's office ... stuffed into a box, desk drawer or file cabinet ... and nothing will come of all our pleas for help.

I am asking that everyone who filed complaints and others who are sympathetic to our cause write the Massachusetts Attorney General and encourage them, demand, plea, or beg those who have received our documents do something to stop the travesty that is going on at the Sandcastle and Southcape resorts.

The address is:
Massachusetts Attorny General
One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108

In your letters please refer to the complaints filed by deeded owners and former deeded owners of timeshare intervals at Sandcastle Resort, Provincetown, MA and Southcape Resort, Mashpee, MA

There are many owners who are appreciative of any support and assistance others can provide us.
 
My check for the first payment of the Special Assessment was returned. Cliff won't cash a check with any conditions attached. There is no legal judgement directing him to deposit the monies so the letters serve only as an opinion of the payor. Cliff likes to flex his muscles.
How were you able to stay at the Sandcastle if your first special assessment installment check was returned?
 
Top