• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Planet Hollywood Towers - the #1 timeshare in the US?

Status
Not open for further replies.
These prices might seem exorbitant to us, but not the guy putting down a $10,000 bet in the ph casino. Owning a piece of the Strip is something that probably makes a lot of sense to him.
This is an area I disagree on, the guy you reference above could care less about worrying about a timeshare, he's comped to the best rooms in the house anyway.
OMG, I agreed with gmarine (I'm avaraging 5xMF this year BTW)
 
Last edited:
Starwood is a 15% owner in the timeshare project link: http://www.lvrj.com/business/7079016.html I'd expect them to hang around for a long term or they would not have spent 15% of $755 M to get involved.

No, once again you've confused the PH resort with the PH Towers timeshare complex. They are not the same! That article says nothing about Starwood being involved in any way with the timeshares.
 
Yikes!! Can you say "Too much money for a Vegas timeshare week"? I'm just a lowly working man, so that's too much money for ANY timeshare week. Even if I ever find myself in a position to have that much cash to throw away, I think I'll find better better places to throw it than into a Westgate property. Putting Starwood in bed with Westgate doesn't really make me more comfortable; conversely, it makes me confused.

For most of us, the whole idea of timesharing is to have fun and create memories. I do accounting for a living, so I don't want to spend time fretting over the ROI of my vacation properties. Nor do I have any desire to spend my vacations looking at pictures of David Seagull, or Johnny Pigeon, or whatever that self-loving huckster's name is.

Nor do I want to mess around trying to rent a unit for $10k/week. I guess I'm poor enough that I can't understand somebody sending me a $10,000 check and hoping I'm honest. Even if I split it into a 2BR, a 1BR, a Studio, and a couple of couches in the hallway, the hassle just seems overwhelming given the upfront investment and lost opportunity costs.

Nope, the required efforts and risks definitely outweigh the potential returns on this one.

Thanks for an entertaining thread, though.

Onward and upward,

Mark
 
I deleted this post
 
Last edited:
I deleted this post
 
Last edited:
Well, I've done my due diligence and pulled the trigger. I've stated my views and make the detailed analysis available to others later this week.

I don't think we will have long to wait to see ph assuming a vaulted position on the LV Strip. Prices charged will indicate the value to the folks buying the villas. These prices might seem exorbitant to us, but not the guy putting down a $10,000 bet in the ph casino. Owning a piece of the Strip is something that probably makes a lot of sense to him.

Perry,

I am not questioning your due diligence and hope all works out well with your purchase but I was just looking for your reasoning why the same things you point out with PH didn't send HGVC@F resales through the roof...

Why will people pay big $$$ resale for PH when HGVC@F is still about 1/3 or less?

Simply put, what makes PH better than HGVC@F?

Pete
 
I deleted this post
 
Last edited:
I deleted this post
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure how many times I need to say this, so I'll say it again - Starwood will be managing the Westgate timeshare towers. I just called Westgate and they confirm this as they said in our sales presentation.

I don't know what other proof I can supply - Starwood paid 15% of the $755 M to get in on ph. This includes the ph hotel and the ph timeshares.

If folks don't believe me I suggest they now contact Westgate direct.

Well if they said it at a Westgate sales presentation, it MUST be true! :D Sorry to be skeptical, but I have not seen ANY independent confirmation of that and find it hard to believe. It is possible that you are correct about it, but I would need more proof than that. None of the articles say Starwood paid for anything other than 15% of the PH casino-resort, which does not include the Miracle Mile Mall or anything else not directly in the resort-casino.
 
Week 52

A little historical perspective here...
MGC became available for purchase around May of 2004. The 3 bedroom floating unit went for $25K and week 52 went for $30K (appoximately). NOW, floating is going for an additional $10K+ and week 52 is going for an additional $30k++.

If ph is equally under priced (time will tell), then Perry will at least break even or make money upon selling. But his stated objective is to use the week. Therefore, this is primarily a way of being able to stay at a very expensive location (LV over New Years) and secondarily, be able to liquidate after a reasonable amount of time and not realize a financial loss which is typically the case with most TSs. Or rent them out, which he has a lot of experience with, to help defray his initial cost. There are many other factors in the equation which has already been discussed in this thread, so I won't duplicate them here.

I will follow the sales of both the ph TS Towers and Marriott Grand Chateau with interest over the next few years to see how this all pans out.
 
I deleted this post
 
Last edited:
Since I'm not a high roller I can only guess how a guy feels losing tens of thousands of dollars to a casino. If a cheap hotel room is all they need to feel like a high roller then that person has more money to donate to the casino.

However if the high roller wants to stay at a 6-star resort on his visits to Vegas and bring others to stay in a casino then he might consider "Owning a piece of the Strip". That sounds more impressive than "high-roller". But I don't pretend to know how that mind thinks.

I have been following this thread today and I really find your logic is self-fulfilling on this topic. Do you really think that the $10K per hand gambler is comp'd a "cheap hotel room". Over at the Wynn, the salon suites are over 1900 sq. ft. include a massage room, 50" plasma TV and all the amenities that come with a 5 Diamond resort. There is of course no kitchen but when you're dropping that kind of coin, who's going to cook? If you are being comped that suite, chances are very strong that you are being comp'd the best restaurants, tickets and other entertainment. The high rollers are not going to be attracted by slogans and location but rather the "What have you done for me lately?" approach. Start to treat the high roller in a manner less than what they have been accustomed and they will move on down the strip.
 
Some of my thoughts:

- I thought one of the first rules of timeshares was, "Don't buy them as an investment"

- Neither Planet Hollywood, nor Westgate (individually and especially collectively) give me a warm, fuzzy feeling. Planet Hollywood was originally know for their restaurants, correct? The first (and last) time I went to them, they seemed to be more about style than substance. Westgate, you don't have to go far on TUG to find the, "What I hate about Westgate..." thread. I'd much rather see Marriott and Disney in partnership than these two people.

- Are people thrilled with the ph casino? I visited it in April, the PF Changes restaurant was horrible (both in service and food quality), and we only went to that one because of disappointment with the Paradise Rd one (I like the chain - there's one 2 miles from work I go to that has no problems). ph is taking over for the Alladdin casino, which failed for some reason. Will ph doa better job?

- Maybe it's me, but I just can't fathom the numbers that are being tossed around for a timeshare WEEK. $50k for a 4br Westgate t/s in Orlando, $100k+ for one in Las Vegas. Obviously some people are paying those numbers, but can that many people afford those numbers? Do people have that much money, or are vacations that important, that they can afford to spend for 1 week what is an above-average annual salary for many people?

- Vegas is always changing. I wouldn't buy anything just because it's the newest thing. At Polo Towers tours a decade ago, their big thing was, "They'll never be another t/s on the strip. Then the 2 (3?) Hilton towers at Sahara went up. You had several t/s's south of the airport. Is the Marriott on Harmon worse than P/T's because it doesn't have a 'Las Vegas Blvd' address? And to be honest, as someone who's gone to Vegas every year for the past 7 or so (and some times before that), honestly I'd rather be away from the Strip. Even crossing it can be a major delay, and if you end up on it (even for a block), forget about it.

Jeff
 
I deleted this post
 
Last edited:
To me this is an example of a top tier timeshare that makes sense if you plan to use it. It could be a great price and appreciate or rent profitably... and it might not. The only thing different from most purchases are 1. the high price tag and 2. the significant research Perry has done to feel comfortable in making the purchase. Though many think that any expensive timeshare is not worth paying for, if you can afford the price, love the resort and intend to use it then it sounds very reasonable. Whether it pans out to be a great investment will be interesting to see.
 
One of the reasons I drew a huge bull’s-eye on my back was to alert folks that flatly refusing to buy from the developer 100% of the time can have them passing up some great opportunities.

I doubt that 6 months from now I will be heralding ph purchases from the developer. Heck that could even be in July just a little more than 1 month from now. Each person here has a comfort level as to what we will buy. Our purchase of this one week is more than a High Country Club membership which is a Destination Club. I felt that our money would be safer in this project than HCC or any DC. My price point for a DC is very low.

Marriott has been selling Grand Chateau for years now and ph just 5 weeks and they are beginning to surpass Marriott in price - this will just accelerate. I saw the sales to backup the current prices and I view the sales prices as underpriced. The Marriott is priced right from the little analysis I did on them.

This is a window of opportunity for those who feel comfortable with these price points. I have a feeling that the prices are already increasing and we all know the developers never move the prices back towards last weeks prices.

Conclusion:
I do expect ph's prices to dwarf Marriott's - this should not be a surprise to anyone. After all, I believe we are witnessing the waking movements of the #1 timeshare in the US. I don't think it will take long for me to be vindicated.

Perry,

Did you know that Tahiti Village's prices already dwarf Marriott's prices? A couple of years ago, when we took the tour at Tahiti Village, they were asking $39,000 for a two bedroom unit and, they had just begun pre-construction sales. Those prices have also gone up. I believe the last price point I saw was $45,000.

Using the acceleration of the developer pricing as a gauge for future resale valuations of any timeshare is penny wise but pound foolish. Just because developer prices will go up is no indication that buying a developer week is a good deal. The more I read, the more I believe you've become intoxicated by the stories you've read of people successfully flipping timeshares that were purchased pre-construction for a slight profit somewhere down the road. That has happened with very few quality timeshares from quailty developers in quality locations.

At issue here is the location, Las Vegas (middle of the desert) and the developer, Westgate, whose history speaks for itself. Las Vegas is not some high demand ski week or beach week somewhere on an exotic shore. It's a timeshare connected to a casino out in the desert. Comparitively, demand for Vegas is not that high and there are many quality units to choose from. In your opinion they may not be Westgate quality but none-the-less they are quality resorts within a stones throw of PH Towers.

It is true that you've managed to get in close to the ground floor for this building (they been in active sales for well over a year now) and developer prices will go up. Exactly how much you've over analyzed this and fooled yourself into thinking resale pricing will support your belief is going to take several more years to see.

The one thing I'm certain of is you had better really like this unit and time to pay those prices from the developer to own it now rather than wait and buy resale latter. I know that I paid to much for my Polo Towers units, my HGVC unit and my Marriott unit. I acknowledge that. However, they were units we liked at the time we saw them, units we wanted to own at the time we saw them and we did not want to wait until they hit the resale market.

When we bought PT's, we were told "Own a piece of the strip." Sorry to burst your bubble but nothing could be further from the truth. True you have a 1/52 interest in one unit in a building on (or in your case near) LV BLV. but, to realize any net gain from "owning a piece of the Las Vegas strip" either all or a huge majority of owners would have to agree to sell out. That's never likely to happen with any major timeshare project on or near the strip. A major improvement would have to take place like what HET offered Summer Bay owners and I just don't see that ever happening with PH Towers unless they are allowed to be run into the ground.
 
I would think a that if a high roller wanted to "own a piece of Las Vegas" he'd be much more likely to purchase a unit at The Residences at MGM Grand. It has everything they could want, as well as multiple weeks usage a year. They can also rent it out through MGM if that's their wish.

JMHO.

Fern
 
Someone plunking down a 10K bet isnt buying a timeshare. He is buying at MGM Grand Residences or similar or just taking the free suite, limo, jet etc that is offered to him by the hotels. Heck, betting $50 per hand for several hours gets me a free room at most vegas hotel. I cant imagine what 10K a hand would bring. Not a timeshare salesman, thats for sure.

Just for a second lets assume the prices double within 5 years. Now lets assume you could sell at this point resale for 50% of the developer price. So what did you make. Nothing, nada , zero. You did however lose 40K or so in interest income assuming 5% per year had you put the 140K in a CD. I wont even get into how bad it would be to finance it.

And thats assuming there will be a market for resale timeshares in the 140K range.

Hey, good luck with it, but there are much better ways to invest in real estate, Las Vegas or otherwise.


Thinking on this ananlysis and the credo that the lowest price house in a neighborhood can bring down the resale price for all other homes in the neighborhood, building PH Towers next to the Marriott, just up the street from Fairfields Grand Desert, within a short walk to the Villa's at Polo Towers, the Suites at Polo Towers, Jockey Club and half a block away from the HGVC Flamingo.......all of which have reasonably priced units on the resale market, might be the aciles heal of your theory of investment on the LV Strip. Poor resale prices at other resorts does not mean people will pay a premium resale price for another resort right next door or half a block away.
 
I'm not sure how many times I need to say this, so I'll say it again - Starwood will be managing the Westgate timeshare towers. I just called Westgate and they confirm this as they said in our sales presentation.

I don't know what other proof I can supply - Starwood paid 15% of the $755 M to get in on ph. This includes the ph hotel and the ph timeshares.

If folks don't believe me I suggest they now contact Westgate direct.

Probably a better source would be to contact Starwood direct.

What I remember reading in the past was that Starwood would be handling hotel or room reservations for the towers and Westgate was managing the timeshares. But, that's been sometime back when I first looked into this property and things could have changed or I could have been given bad informations.

At any rate, I'm not trusting some TS salesman to tell me the truth or someone sitting behind a desk at Westgate.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I should have held on to my week at the Carriage House, just across Harmon. I might have gotten a bigger profit.
 
P.S.
As and aside. In the case of WM I get chewed out for predicting lower prices. In the case of ph I get chewed out for predicting higher prices. Does predicting no price increase/decrease result in an “Attaboy!”?

Attaboy ;)

BTW, I'm am simply playing devils advocate here. You should know by now that I buy from developers all to often myself. :wall:
 
I've not been to the HGVC, we just went to the Star Trek exhibit up at the Hilton. I got the impression I was at a convention center and not the glitzy Strip. But I must admit we were not there at night and not on the Strip. We did see the Trek'y theme to the one casino at the Hilton. I just didn't see the Strip in front of me.

So here I must plead ignorance.

P.S.
Why will someone pay $139,900 for a week 52 4BR in the ph and not buy 20 week 52's at the Polo Towers. Simple, they don't want to stay at the Polo Towers but want to stay at a casino - they want to eat, sleep, and gamble at a casino.

I have the same attitude towards a Ski resort.

Perry,

I am not talking about HGVC at the Hilton which you are correct, is in the middle of nowhere.

I am talking about the HGVC at the Flamingo Hotel... part of the 15 acre Flamingo complex right on the strip, across the street from (and easy walking distance) Caesars Palace , Bellagio, Mirage, Bally's, Harrah's and may be a closer walk along the strip to PH's main casino in the old Aladdin than from the PH timeshares.

If you were in the Flamingo... head out to the tropical pool area and the timeshare tower shares the full pool area with the hotel as well as a private pool just for people in the timeshare tower.

Hilton Grand Vacations Club at the Flamingo - Las Vegas
3575 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, NV 89109

http://www.hiltongrandvacations.com/flamingo-resort-las-vegas.php

Here is a map.... the Flamingo is the location.
http://www.johnnyroadtrip.com/cities/lasvegas/maps/map_striphotels.htm

This is the best location in Vegas... and is as close to the true heart of the strip. (Also it has the shortest walk to the monorail)

This place is holding it's own on pricing but it is far from 6 figures.

If for no other reason but location it beats PH and you can't be #1 in the US if isn't #1 in Vegas....

Pete
 
Priceless!

Purchase of 5,000 Hilton Grand Vacation Club points (South Beach) = $4,800

Reservation for HGVC Flamingo Resort (on the Strip with Casino!) for 5 days over New Years every year = 3,840 HGVC points

New Years in Vegas (on the Strip with Casino!) every year = PRICELESS!!! *


* Actually a savings of $134,000 over PH Towers **

** Savings = 15 additional weeks @ High Country Club resorts throughout the World!! (and money left over for the purchase of a new watch!)
 
I'm not sure how many times I need to say this, so I'll say it again - Starwood will be managing the Westgate timeshare towers. I just called Westgate and they confirm this as they said in our sales presentation.

I don't know what other proof I can supply - Starwood paid 15% of the $755 M to get in on ph. This includes the ph hotel and the ph timeshares.

If folks don't believe me I suggest they now contact Westgate direct.

The Planet Hollywood hotel has been branded a Sheraton and is being managed by Starwood.

Nowhere can I find anything about Starwood being involved with managing the Planet Hollywood Towers by Westgate.

The PH towers by Westgate is promoted on the Westgate website. Since Westgate manages all of its properties I dont see why they wouldnt to manage PH Towers as well. Here is a link to the PH website with a link to the press release.
http://www.planethollywoodresort.com/PHTbyWestgate.html
Nowhere in it is Starwood mentioned as having anything to do with the timeshare towers.

If Starwood managing the PH towers is important to you, I hope you have confirmation from another source other than a Westgate salesperson.
 
Last edited:
I deleted this post
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top