Thanks for posting this information. I wasn't going to bring up the specifics about the reasoning you shared here, but since you have now brought it up, here's the actual verbiage from the Mountain Meadows Assocation proxy vote paperwork:
View attachment 116108
Keep in mind these are documents actually reviewed by K&L Gates - the representative law firm - so the statistics and reasonings shared are likely accurate and can be proven in any court of law. So here we have a real world example of exactly what I've been saying all along, that a subset of the resorts have low occupancy (some of which also have lower owner occupancy), and some resorts have impending SAs on the horizon. Given many have questioned the veracity of these claims, I figured it would be worthwhile sharing the specifics for all to see.