• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

[MERGED] T&L expands Sports Illustrated Resorts portfolio with New Vacation Ownership Destination in Nashville

According to this Article Travel and Leisure only brought 10 units out of 193. So roughly 500 intervals?

Daniel
I understand that the deal will be what they consider "asset light", so Travel + Leisure isn't developing the property. So I think that sale of 10 units on the second floor is for a sales center. Then someone else will convert and sell the units to Travel + Leisure in a just in time model where they will then be sold as timeshare. Of course, I could be all wrong in that understanding and perhaps only 10 units will be converted to timeshare under Travel + Leisure.
 
If you read the article about the sale Travel and Leisure only brought `10 units on the second floor out of 193.
I guess this is a similar to Margaritaville in Pigeon Forge. I heard there is not many MVC in that building either.

Daniel
There’s zero MVC in Pigeon Forge now. I don’t think any of the units were ever owned within the vacation club - it was just an associate hotel.
 
I understand that the deal will be what they consider "asset light", so Travel + Leisure isn't developing the property. So I think that sale of 10 units on the second floor is for a sales center. Then someone else will convert and sell the units to Travel + Leisure in a just in time model where they will then be sold as timeshare. Of course, I could be all wrong in that understanding and perhaps only 10 units will be converted to timeshare under Travel + Leisure.
That reminds me that Brown referred to it as just in time during the earnings call, so I’d guess this is spot on.
 
There’s zero MVC in Pigeon Forge now. I don’t think any of the units were ever owned within the vacation club - it was just an associate hotel.
do they still show the models at the Island sales center still?
Daniel
 
That reminds me that Brown referred to it as just in time during the earnings call, so I’d guess this is spot on.
I actually got it from the earnings call. Based on the total number of units, it would seem there are more than 10 units on each floor. So it isn't like Travel + Leisure bought an entire floor (or floors) like they have at the Margaritaville Vacation Club in Nashville. 10 ynits can't be all that big and makes sense to be a sales space more than units they are acquiring to sell.
 
I remember hearing about this Sports Illustrated thing as a possibility at an update over a year ago, I think I even posted about it here, it seemed pretty far fetched to me because of some of the cities they touted, like "Tuscaloosa, AL"... really? Other than Alabama fans visiting that dump of a city for "Tide" games, I cannot see that as a destination that would have ongoing year round support.
I had one daughter graduate from the U of Alabama and can say that this and other larger schools have year-round visits from parents, who knowing they have 4-5 years of a child living away might consider this a smart way to have a local place to stay. In addition, every other sport, baseball, basketball, soccer, and every academic meeting , conference hosted etc as additional draws.
 
I still can't get over "Tuscaloosa"...


For the record, I went to the University of Florida, lived in Gainesville, FL which is about as "college town" as it gets.

It's not a place I would ever consider vacationing at. And it's much better than Tuscaloosa. I visited a lot of SEC schools and college towns while I was going to UF, so I got a good feel for a lot of them.

Not many of them I would consider vacation destinations,

I've already gotten in trouble and i guess rightfully so, for crapping on the Jersey shore, so I will leave it at that.

Copycat business decision which I don't see having long term legs.
I don't think it is being sold as a vacation destination. This is a great place for parents who send their child off for 5 years to stay when they visit, a great place for conference going visitors to stay together, and a place not only for football crowds but also basketball, baseball and the rest of the sports teams that draw fans. The university has academic events, speakers, graduations etc also. This is not going to be sold at all like other Wyndham properties, it is a new audience.
 
I don't think it is being sold as a vacation destination. This is a great place for parents who send their child off for 5 years to stay when they visit, a great place for conference going visitors to stay together, and a place not only for football crowds but also basketball, baseball and the rest of the sports teams that draw fans. The university has academic events, speakers, graduations etc also. This is not going to be sold at all like other Wyndham properties, it is a new audience.
It's still very event-specific with a lot of weeks where very little is going on. I live in Athens as a comparison - graduation, move-in, parents' weekend, football weekends. Basketball and baseball are much lesser draws, especially weekday games. Once you get into other events - our summer music festival, two half+ marathon weekends, conferences at our downtown conference center, etc. - you're talking less about vacation ownership and more about renting unsold inventory in more of a hotel/airbnb type scenario, but you would need that to fill those units all 52 weeks out of the year.
 
I don't think it is being sold as a vacation destination. This is a great place for parents who send their child off for 5 years to stay when they visit, a great place for conference going visitors to stay together, and a place not only for football crowds but also basketball, baseball and the rest of the sports teams that draw fans. The university has academic events, speakers, graduations etc also. This is not going to be sold at all like other Wyndham properties, it is a new audience.

I lived in a college town for 7 years while going to school and trying to make life / job work in that same town after graduation (dumb idea). I know all that, and also know that there's an existing plant of hotels sitting mostly empty 5 days a week to accomodate those visiting parents. They make their entire year's worth of income during football weekends and move in/move out weekends 6 times per year. Everything else is gravy for them. I just actually looked at the weekend before classes start and there's no shortage of sub $80/night rooms. If you look the week before, or the week after move-in week, it's even cheaper and more availability.

This weird niche market for "parents that want to stay in a condo instead of a hotel" probably exists, but I have to guess is incredibly small.

I guess we will find out.
 
And all this discussion over a lousy TEN (10) units, which will only be available to T/S folks at Founder level or above, for the very necessary ARP.
But that fact won't be mentioned to the new retail buyers of 105 or 140K CWA points!
 
I don't think it is being sold as a vacation destination. This is a great place for parents who send their child off for 5 years to stay when they visit, a great place for conference going visitors to stay together, and a place not only for football crowds but also basketball, baseball and the rest of the sports teams that draw fans. The university has academic events, speakers, graduations etc also. This is not going to be sold at all like other Wyndham properties, it is a new audience.

Perhaps Wyndham will also ink deals with the actual universities for some of the resort inventory to host the incoming academics, speakers, events, temporary staff, etc. Thinking outside the box.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
And all this discussion over a lousy TEN (10) units, which will only be available to T/S folks at Founder level or above, for the very necessary ARP.
But that fact won't be mentioned to the new retail buyers of 105 or 140K CWA points!

From the July 23rd T+L earnings call:

"In [the] last week, we announced our newest Sports Illustrated Resorts location in Nashville, Tennessee. Located on Music Row in the heart of Midtown just one mile from downtown, the planned resort will feature 185 units and is expected to open in the spring of 2027. These new brands will help us expand into key markets, reach new audiences and offer experiences suited to their lifestyles.

Nashville is a conversion property. It will be just in time inventory to match revenue to sales, 185 units opening in the spring of 2026 and expectation is to start sales at some point in Q4 this year. Tuscaloosa is a purpose-built project, which we've gone through the permitting process, which put us about a quarter behind from our original expectations. So it's going to be early '27 for delivery."


That does not sound like "a lousy TEN units" to me, especially the "purpose-built project" part.
 
Did some investigation on Nashville location - It will be where the current Placemakr property is 1600 McGavock St.

Article about the sale which notes that part of it was sold to T+L

And then I did a google street view to confirm
Google View of Placemakr
View attachment 113271
and Picture from new resort website

View attachment 113272
 
I was quoting the above post, and relative to only Nashville. The 10 units are clearly noted in the narrative. See below"

According to a Davidson County Register of Deeds document, the new owner is an LLC affiliated with Memphis-based Kemmons Wilson Hospitality Partners (KWHP).


The seller was an LLC associated with Washington D.C.-based Placemakr.

The building offers 193 unit, rendering the deal the equivalent of $347,150 per unit.

In a related move, and according to a separate Davidson County Register of Deeds document, the buying LLC sold 10 units located on the second floor of the building for $7.68 million.



The buyer in that transaction was an Orlando LLC seemingly associated with timeshare company Travel + Leisure Company.
 
I was quoting the above post, and relative to only Nashville. The 10 units are clearly noted in the narrative. See below"

According to a Davidson County Register of Deeds document, the new owner is an LLC affiliated with Memphis-based Kemmons Wilson Hospitality Partners (KWHP).


The seller was an LLC associated with Washington D.C.-based Placemakr.

The building offers 193 unit, rendering the deal the equivalent of $347,150 per unit.

In a related move, and according to a separate Davidson County Register of Deeds document, the buying LLC sold 10 units located on the second floor of the building for $7.68 million.



The buyer in that transaction was an Orlando LLC seemingly associated with timeshare company Travel + Leisure Company.
This was addressed in a different SI thread:
I understand that the deal will be what they consider "asset light", so Travel + Leisure isn't developing the property. So I think that sale of 10 units on the second floor is for a sales center. Then someone else will convert and sell the units to Travel + Leisure in a just in time model where they will then be sold as timeshare. Of course, I could be all wrong in that understanding and perhaps only 10 units will be converted to timeshare under Travel + Leisure.
So it’s very likely the 10 initial units are only the sales center, especially since it’s the second floor.
 
Who would make a lifetime purchase commitment for a four or five year college education?
 
Who would make a lifetime purchase commitment for a four or five year college education?
The college itself certainly might consider it for ongoing temporary housing needs for various legitimate purposes.
 
The college itself certainly might consider it for ongoing temporary housing needs for various legitimate purposes.
So Wyndhams target market for this property will be to sell to the university? Universities are going to be buying timeshare?
 
So Wyndhams target market for this property will be to sell to the university? Universities are going to be buying timeshare?
I certainly think it's at least feasible yes, though probably unlikely big picture. The college itself is the one entity involved that certainly lays claim to a lifetime purchase commitment making sense purely from a basic logical standpoint. Not saying it's going to happen, I'm simply saying it's feasible is all - and gives Wyndham and SI new blood to bring into sales updates.
 
That (a university actually purchasing timeshare contracts) seems like the least likely market for owners here, for multiple reasons. Many universities of the type under discussion here already have their own hotel and conference center. The last thing they want is their academic or other official guests being hit up for a timeshare presentation when they check in. Availability doesn’t cease to be an issue with points-based timeshares, especially on short notice. Most universities of the type under discussion here are public, and a developer purchase of timeshare interest would be abysmal stewardship of public funds.

I could see some sort of marketing partnership, or more likely, just the developer renting out its unsold inventory competing with local hotels. If university ownership was feasible, you’d have seen William and Mary buying up Williamsburg timeshares long ago, or UNLV in Las Vegas - but they haven’t.
 
That (a university actually purchasing timeshare contracts) seems like the least likely market for owners here, for multiple reasons. Many universities of the type under discussion here already have their own hotel and conference center. The last thing they want is their academic or other official guests being hit up for a timeshare presentation when they check in. Availability doesn’t cease to be an issue with points-based timeshares, especially on short notice. Most universities of the type under discussion here are public, and a developer purchase of timeshare interest would be abysmal stewardship of public funds.

I could see some sort of marketing partnership, or more likely, just the developer renting out its unsold inventory competing with local hotels. If university ownership was feasible, you’d have seen William and Mary buying up Williamsburg timeshares long ago, or UNLV in Las Vegas - but they haven’t.
You assume the university would be subject to the same purchasing processes and rules as a normal consumer. I would surmise that assumption would not be valid in this case. Wyndham can sell this product however they so desire. They could lease the product to the university - similar to Wyndham Discovery - and never require a purchase - they can do pretty much whatever they want as the developer - subject to the governing trust rules of course. Just because something hasn't occurred in the past doesn't mean it's not going to occur in the future, change is the only constant. Again, it's unlikely, but it's possible, and it would remediate the risks that everyone is mentioning in this thread regarding seasonalities and limited audiences that would really be interested in the concept.
 
@paxarah is absolutely right. Universities, especially PUBLIC Universities would never be involved in a business transaction with a timeshare company. This would not pass any level of scrutiny and would be an audit nightmare.

I have worked for the government in the past and the general "perpetual" nature of a timeshare contract would not be allowed by law. The government cannot enter into any sort of agreement which would contractually obligate the entity to be on the hook for maintenance fees into perpetuity, forever, with no control over escalation of charges year over year.

Just would not happen. Every contract the government enters into it's required to have escape clauses and terms which require favorable exit and renewal terms. None of which timeshares could or would offer.

Also there is the matter of government travel always requiring the most inexpensive option possible, which is almost never a timeshare/condo.

Again, having worked for and travelled for the government, the type of accommodation was never negotiable. If there was some roach infested Days Inn for $68/night, or a Hilton for $150/night, my ass was staying in the Hilton. No exception.

It's a completely different world than the private sector. And I imagine with "DOGE" now, it's even worse.

Also as mentioned, most universities have hotels on-site, and part of their licensing agreements include provisions for the hotel to provide a certain number of rooms for their "traveling dignitaries" are extremely low pre-negotiated rates exactly for this purpose...
 
Also there is the matter of government travel always requiring the most inexpensive option possible, which is almost never a timeshare/condo.
ACTUALLY, I'm a (retired now) Public University Professor and I bought into Wyndham to beat the high cost of hotels in the DC area when I did research at the Library of Congress, the Smithsonian and the University of Maryland College Park Special Collections.

How it worked was I would always use up my points in a use year, or deposit them forward. Booked with "rented" points at $12/1000 for my conference and research travel. You get a receipt for this, which the University and grant agencies require. Stayed at Old Town Alexandria, Edisto Island, Nashville, Patriot's Place in Williamsburg, and even Chicago (when we had it)...all coming way under the per diem and really stretching out my grant money. I've used Atlanta, NYC, and National Harbor in addition to Nashville as conference hotels....once you get tenure the universities don't always pony up for your expenses and you are usually on your own dime. Took students to Nashville and Atlantic City for conferences and they thought that they were staying in a palace instead of crowding into a Motel 6 or Super 8.

IF a university bought out a timeshare they would probably not keep it as a timeshare but use it for apartment-style student housing.

One draw back to my "renting" out points from Wyndham was that the sales teams all thought that I was a hot prospect because I always used up my points and needed more. HaHaHa!
 
ACTUALLY, I'm a (retired now) Public University Professor and I bought into Wyndham to beat the high cost of hotels in the DC area when I did research at the Library of Congress, the Smithsonian and the University of Maryland College Park Special Collections.

How it worked was I would always use up my points in a use year, or deposit them forward. Booked with "rented" points at $12/1000 for my conference and research travel. You get a receipt for this, which the University and grant agencies require. Stayed at Old Town Alexandria, Edisto Island, Nashville, Patriot's Place in Williamsburg, and even Chicago (when we had it)...all coming way under the per diem and really stretching out my grant money. I've used Atlanta, NYC, and National Harbor in addition to Nashville as conference hotels....once you get tenure the universities don't always pony up for your expenses and you are usually on your own dime. Took students to Nashville and Atlantic City for conferences and they thought that they were staying in a palace instead of crowding into a Motel 6 or Super 8.

My previous post was geared towards a government agency owning the timeshare and using it for staff.

From an employee angle, using for "work travel", I tried that too, but they would never allow that because even though I could prove my MF/1000 and could show how many points I consumed, they would not accept that. So I got frustrated and went with whatever garbage hotel they ended up booking. It was especially frustrating because I managed my team's budget and our travel and training budget was always severely limited, so this would legitimately save money in some cases.

But admittedly that's admittedly an angle I had not attempted (renting points). Clever.
 
My previous post was geared towards a government agency owning the timeshare and using it for staff.

From an employee angle, using for "work travel", I tried that too, but they would never allow that because even though I could prove my MF/1000 and could show how many points I consumed, they would not accept that. So I got frustrated and went with whatever garbage hotel they ended up booking. It was especially frustrating because I managed my team's budget and our travel and training budget was always severely limited, so this would legitimately save money in some cases.

But admittedly that's admittedly an angle I had not attempted (renting points). Clever.
Renting points or using EH/VS might serve as a viable option these days, or if you could find a last minute booking within the 15 day window, you could always use the "pay instead of points" option that's now available at IIRC around $5/1000 points which is a pretty good deal. Since its actual dollars instead of points, would that have been acceptable?
 
Top