The HOA would inform the impacted owners as part of the up or down vote process, I was referring to a public notice to the press for all to see. That’s why I stated the HOA process would need to play out further. I would surmise that Wyndham doesn’t hold a solid majority for every single resort HOA in scope, which could very well be why they are not sharing any list early in the process prior to any HOA votes.
If they were to only publicly share a subset of the list now, limited only to the resorts where they have majority votes in the bag, but actually inform the HOAs for a larger superset that also includes resorts where they may need a certain percentage of owners to vote affirmative to exit, and people find out about it, that creates confusion. Why did Wyndham only publish some resorts but not others? What else don’t we know? Why are they being dishonest and not publishing the entire list?
If they were to publish the entire list, including a subset of resorts where the actual vote outcome ultimately may prevent exit because they don’t hold a majority of the inventory, and therefore the outcome is uncertain, then Wyndham plays their hand too early and takes heat for trying to exit certain resorts, some of which aren’t a sure thing. This approach might also have legal ramifications. Sometimes playing your hand too early isn’t the best move for valid reasons. IDK either way, I’m just saying, it’s not as straightforward or binary as everyone wants to make it out to be. As
@TUGBrian said, who sits on timeshare BODs, some of bylaws and legal requirements don’t make good sense, but they still have to follow them regardless.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk