• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Pros/Cons of your trust holding title to your timeshare

LOL - good grief Wilma, spoken like someone who has no clue how real property law works in the entire USA or how estates are probated in the USA. Perhaps those good "Tuggers" you are referring to should stop offering really poor legal advice! Or perhaps you simply believe that anyone who goes to TUG to ask a legal question gets crappy advice from all of the long time members who don't understand how the law works. I've indicated in every comment that my comments apply to deeded real estate. That is the only thing that anyone asking about a Revocable Living Trust should care about. So, for those folks who may own a contract in Mexico or a RTU, they should not even be asking about Revocable Living Trusts. Just so you understand, timeshare contracts and RTUs aren't real property interests! Perhaps you need to stop posting horrible legal advice that will only serve to cause problems for folks.
I only said what I did. TUG has advised people how to buy, sell, give away, reject ts since the site was created. You seem overly emotionally invested in this thread. No one here is going to consult you on what to do. You carry no more weight than anyone else posting.
 
I own 14 winter weeks in Sanibel.
7 of those are during the Xmas holidays and I,my wife and my adult children normally use them every year (Hurricane Ian has currently disrupted that plan)
My timeshare trust was set up because I am confident that those timeshares have significant value and that the family will want to keep them
The trust's purpose is mainly to avoid Florida probate

I also own other timeshares that are in the trust. I probably need to review things to make sure that is what I really want.
If this thread does nothing else it should emphasize to all of us that we need to have some plan in place and that we need to review that plan from time to time
 
I own 14 winter weeks in Sanibel.
7 of those are during the Xmas holidays and I,my wife and my adult children normally use them every year (Hurricane Ian has currently disrupted that plan)
My timeshare trust was set up because I am confident that those timeshares have significant value and that the family will want to keep them
The trust's purpose is mainly to avoid Florida probate

I also own other timeshares that are in the trust. I probably need to review things to make sure that is what I really want.
If this thread does nothing else it should emphasize to all of us that we need to have some plan in place and that we need to review that plan from time to time


"If this thread does nothing else it should emphasize to all of us that we need to have some plan in place
and that we need to review that plan from time to time"

Yes :thumbup:
 
I own 14 winter weeks in Sanibel.
7 of those are during the Xmas holidays and I,my wife and my adult children normally use them every year (Hurricane Ian has currently disrupted that plan)
My timeshare trust was set up because I am confident that those timeshares have significant value and that the family will want to keep them
The trust's purpose is mainly to avoid Florida probate

I also own other timeshares that are in the trust. I probably need to review things to make sure that is what I really want.
If this thread does nothing else it should emphasize to all of us that we need to have some plan in place and that we need to review that plan from time to time
14 weeks on Sanibel definitely have value. Which resort?
 
I only said what I did. TUG has advised people how to buy, sell, give away, reject ts since the site was created. You seem overly emotionally invested in this thread. No one here is going to consult you on what to do. You carry no more weight than anyone else posting.

So TUG now gives out legal advice? (Brian -- Did you know that? Is your malpractice insurance paid up?)

No, of course TUG doesn't give legal advice; it is merely a place where people post opinions -- opinions usually based on fact but sometimes not.

Good lawyers get frustrated when clients do dumb stuff.
 
In our research and discussions with our lawyer, our understanding is that timeshares NEVER go into the trust. There is literally no benefit to the heirs, but extra legal work and burden. If heirs wants to take over the ownership, cannot think of a timeshare which will say no to that. And if they don't, then there is nothing they have to do legally.
 
In our research and discussions with our lawyer, our understanding is that timeshares NEVER go into the trust. There is literally no benefit to the heirs, but extra legal work and burden. If heirs wants to take over the ownership, cannot think of a timeshare which will say no to that. And if they don't, then there is nothing they have to do legally.
I assume you are a California resident owning Westin Desert Willow. If not, it doesn't matter that Westin would be okay with your heirs taking over. The problem is that an out-of-state executor cannot convey title to a California timeshare unless there is a California probate proceeding.

Or that the timeshare is in a trust.
 
Last edited:
We set up a trust for our kids a couple years ago. We did not change the deeds to the timeshares. We just included them on a list of assets but they are not technically in the trust. I’d need to go back and see exactly what we did but I know we did not re-title them.

Someone mentioned there is a max value that can be in the trust. That is not true. All of our assets are in the trust. The only thing is that there are inheritance maximums for tax purposes.

I imagine we will sell or give away the timeshares when we are done with them. One idea would be to write down instructions on how to sell or give away the timeshares in the event you do not sell them before you pass away. That way, the family knows how to get rid of them. But if they are worth virtually nothing, I guess this is not an issue.
 
I think a lot of the problem in this thread is that everyone is thinking of his own particular situation.

I think the answer depends on whether the TS is worth anything, if it's deeded real estate, whether it is paid off or has any liens, if it's in a different state than the owners' domicile, and what the owners want to happen to it when they die. So no answer fits everyone.

In our case, Marriott Waiohai, it's worth $14000 and we want it to go to our son with minimal fuss and expense. He is not an, umm, detail-oriented person. We have to have a trust anyway as we own non-residential real estate in CA worth lots more than the TS.

The plan is to put it into the (relatively new) trust and have it become his if we don't sell it before we die. Just like the CA RE, he can sell it, or keep it and use it by transferring it to himself. If we leave it out of the trust, he'll have to figure out how to get it probated or otherwise acquire authority to sell it, and we'd rather do the hassle ourselves now than leave that to him later, especially if he decides he doesn't want it.
 
Last edited:
How I have seen this work is the assets are placed in a trust so there is no probate. The crap items like a timeshare are kept out of the trust. The beneficiaries of the trust pass away. Their assets are in a trust which effectively impoverished them. Every State has a law spelling out how much an estate will need to be worth to require full probate and by using the trust there is nothing left in the estate to probate. The timeshares are not in the trust and will eventually be foreclosed on as the maintenance fees are no longer being paid. This is the scenario I know.

Bill
Just FYI - yes, assets are placed in trust to avoid probate. By keeping crap assets like timeshare out of the trust, you only burden the executor of the estate (if he or she wants to comply with his or her legal obligations) as well as you burden the fellow owners of the crap timeshare because unpaid MFs are allocated back to your fellow owners as unpaid debt, that increases the MFs. Note, it isn't (hopefully) the beneficiaries of the trust who die. It is the grantors of the trust (ie the ones who set it up to hold their assets) who die and then the trust designates the beneficiaries of the assets. You might also want to note that trusts don't die when the grantor dies, unless the wording of the trust requires a distribution of assets. Trusts are basically contracts you create with yourself to detail how you want your assets to be handled post mortem. Anyway, not sure why you believe that "their assets are in a trust which effectively impoverished them." Simply because someone has a trust, it doesn't mean that their debts are not paid upon their death. Credit card debts, medical expenses, household utilities, taxes, etc. Those all get paid by the executor/successor trustee. When someone dies, their representative also prepares and files tax returns and pays the costs related to death. Whatever that may be. Cemetery, crematorium, etc. The grantor isn't buried in a pauper plot. Absolutely, each state has its own laws regarding estates and what is required to be probated. And, yes, if the executor of the estate abandons the crap timeshare, as I indicated in one of my comments, then AFTER the statutory timeframe, the HOA will have no choice but to commence legal proceedings to foreclose upon the ownership interest that has failed to pay the MFs for the requisite statutory time frame. All the while, the cost of the unpaid MFs and the cost of any and all legal proceedings are borne by the remaining owners of that crap timeshare in the form of increased MFs. WHY would you want to screw your fellow owners like that? What decent human being gets a thrill out of screwing their fellow owners? And the reason why a foreclosure is needed is because, as I have said, all real property ownership can only pass by recorded deed. It needs to be signed by the seller/owner. The seller/owner must be (a) alive and (b) competent to sign. The exception to that is when (1) the owner is dead and the executor of an estate obtains a probate court order authorizing the transfer of ownership from the deceased to the new owner; (2) the owner is incompetent and a durable power of attorney exists with the right to legally convey real property ownership; or (3) a foreclosure is completed, which results in a court order authorizing the legal transfer of ownership based upon those proceedings.
 
We set up a trust for our kids a couple years ago. We did not change the deeds to the timeshares. We just included them on a list of assets but they are not technically in the trust. I’d need to go back and see exactly what we did but I know we did not re-title them.

Someone mentioned there is a max value that can be in the trust. That is not true. All of our assets are in the trust. The only thing is that there are inheritance maximums for tax purposes.

I imagine we will sell or give away the timeshares when we are done with them. One idea would be to write down instructions on how to sell or give away the timeshares in the event you do not sell them before you pass away. That way, the family knows how to get rid of them. But if they are worth virtually nothing, I guess this is not an issue.
Just FYI - if you have set up the trust but never legally transferred ownership of titled assets to the trust, then the trust doesn't own them and those assets will pass via will or intestate if you do not have a will.
 
I have created a separate trust for our 3 Marriott timeshares. The trust has no other assets and myself, my husband and our two daughters are co-trustees. When we are deceased, our daughters or either of them can choose to continue the trust and pay the maintenance fees or simply abandon the timeshares. There are no other assets in the trust that can claimed by Marriott.
 
I only said what I did. TUG has advised people how to buy, sell, give away, reject ts since the site was created. You seem overly emotionally invested in this thread. No one here is going to consult you on what to do. You carry no more weight than anyone else posting.
Wilma - I have been helping my fellow owners for the last eight years understand about trusts and how they work. I abhor misinformation and horrible legal advice doled out by folks here who have no understanding of how real property law works. My only goal is to help my fellow owners understand the process. I do that regularly with my writings on the topic of MVC ownership. Folks who have no legal education or understanding of real property law shouldn't be giving advice. Real property law is NOT an opinion.
 
Anyway, not sure why you believe that "their assets are in a trust which effectively impoverished them."

If you could space your post out a little by using paragraphs they would be easier to read and comprehend. You do make some very good points, imo.

Many people irrevocable trusts to protect their assets from costs such as medical bills and nursing home costs. To do this they need to impoverish themselves with the possibility of a five year look back from medicaid. After this five year period they are effectively impoverished by medicaid standards.

Timeshares do not have a look back period. If a person passes away with all assets in an irrevocable trust and the timeshare obligations are not paid , discovery efforts will reveal that there is no client to contact and possibly no assets to garnish. While this isn't the ideal way to dispose of an obligation it is common.

Bill
 
Last edited:
Wilma - I have been helping my fellow owners for the last eight years understand about trusts and how they work. I abhor misinformation and horrible legal advice doled out by folks here who have no understanding of how real property law works. My only goal is to help my fellow owners understand the process. I do that regularly with my writings on the topic of MVC ownership. Folks who have no legal education or understanding of real property law shouldn't be giving advice. Real property law is NOT an opinion.
The point which you are missing is that timeshares that are kept out of the trust do not get passed on, unless an action is taken, like undergoing probate. Because timeshare is not passed on "automatically", the HOA has no option but to take it back. This is good advice for owners who do not want to burden their heirs on what to do with the timeshare. If you want your heirs to inherit the timeshare, then by all means, put them into the trust.

We don't own "crap" timeshare, and HOA can recover whatever costs as necessary from taking back our ownership.
 
Last edited:
Wilma - I have been helping my fellow owners for the last eight years understand about trusts and how they work. I abhor misinformation and horrible legal advice doled out by folks here who have no understanding of how real property law works. My only goal is to help my fellow owners understand the process. I do that regularly with my writings on the topic of MVC ownership. Folks who have no legal education or understanding of real property law shouldn't be giving advice. Real property law is NOT an opinion.
I presume this is a post from Leslie Detwiler
She is very knowledgeable about Marriott, legal structure, the law in general
She is moderator of a group on Facebook about MVC
I have had discussions on the fine points and minutia of Marriott ownership
She is usually correct in her information
I no longer do a check on her information as she has nailed the response once she has all the facts
 
The point which you are missing is that timeshares that are kept out of the trust do not get passed on, unless an action is taken, like undergoing probate. Because timeshare is not passed on "automatically", the HOA has no option but to take it back. This is good advice for owners who do not want to burden their heirs on what to do with the timeshare. If you want your heirs to inherit the timeshare, then by all means, put them into the trust.

We don't own "crap" timeshare, and HOA can recover whatever costs as necessary from taking back our ownership.
That is such poor advice. When the crap timeshares are in a trust, the successor trustee can sell or otherwise dispose of the ownership without any court intervention. You don't burden your fellow owners with your debt. The successor trustee can execute a deed to transfer the ownership to the HOA, saving all owners the time and expense of a foreclosure proceeding. That is the reason why trusts are important. Legal acts can be done right away. And, NO, your heirs are not burdened by unwanted timeshares. No beneficiary is mandated to accept a trust distribution of assets. Why do you keep perpetuating that myth? That is simply not how the law works.
 
If you could space your post out a little by using paragraphs they would be easier to read and comprehend. You do make some very good points, imo.

Many people start trusts to protect their assets from costs such as medical bills and nursing home costs. To do this they need to impoverish themselves with the possibility of a five year look back from medicaid. After this five year period they are effectively impoverished by medicaid standards.

Timeshares do not have a look back period. If a person passes away with all assets in a trust and the timeshare obligations are not paid , discovery efforts will reveal that there is no client to contact and possibly no assets to garnish. While this isn't the ideal way to dispose of an obligation it is common.

Bill
You are going far away from estate planning for timeshare owners if you are going to start talking about Medicare look back periods for fraudulent transfers, etc. What you are also missing is that when folks set up trusts to avoid paying healthcare costs or long term living costs they are not setting up a revocable living trust. That is an asset of the grantor. You are also misinformed about the process upon death of a grantor of a revocable living trust Bill. Discovery doesn't commence. A fraudulent conveyance action isn't started. Rather, the burdened HOA and fellow owners must wait the statutory period to proceed with a foreclosure action in order to recover title to the timeshare. That may be 5 years. It could be longer. Why do you want to burden your HOA like that? If that is your goal, then give the timeshare away before you die for goodness sake. And just a note, your approach completely ignores the fiduciary duties of your estate representative, whether an executor or a successor trustee. Debts of the decedent must be paid prior to distribution of the trust assets. Failure to do so is a breach of fiduciary duty. But again, that is a long ways away from the concept of estate planning for timeshare owners.
 
That is such poor advice. When the crap timeshares are in a trust, the successor trustee can sell or otherwise dispose of the ownership without any court intervention. You don't burden your fellow owners with your debt. The successor trustee can execute a deed to transfer the ownership to the HOA, saving all owners the time and expense of a foreclosure proceeding. That is the reason why trusts are important. Legal acts can be done right away. And, NO, your heirs are not burdened by unwanted timeshares. No beneficiary is mandated to accept a trust distribution of assets. Why do you keep perpetuating that myth? That is simply not how the law works.
Poor vs. good advice is dependent on each situation. They both work.

Also, HOA can take back a deed immediately without undergoing a long foreclosure process, aka deedback in lieu of foreclosure.
 
Poor vs. good advice is dependent on each situation. They both work.

Also, HOA can take back a deed immediately without undergoing a long foreclosure process.
What you are missing is that when you purposefully leave your timeshares outside of your trust, even if you have absolutely nothing else (which is doubtful), your executor is legally obligated to probate real estate. But that is again getting away from general estate planning advice for timeshare owners. If your entire goal is to screw your HOA and your fellow owners by burdening them with your MFs and legal costs to foreclose, then by all means, do it. If, however, you want to actually make things easier for your executor, successor trustee, your HOA and your fellow owners, you'll make arrangements to allow for the legal transfer of title without the need for foreclosure. What folks needs to understand is that action NEVER results in screwing the developer.

And, when the owner is dead, there is no such process as a "deedback in lieu of foreclosure." Who would you have sign the deed? There either must be a probate to transfer ownership via court order or a foreclosure to transfer ownership under applicable state law.
 
Last edited:
What you are missing is that when you purposefully leave your timeshares outside of your trust, even if you have absolutely nothing else (which is doubtful), your executor is legally obligated to probate real estate. But that is again getting away from general estate planning advice for timeshare owners. If your entire goal is to screw your HOA and your fellow owners by burdening them with your MFs and legal costs to foreclose, then by all means, do it. If, however, you want to actually make things easier for your executor, successor trustee, your HOA and your fellow owners, you'll make arrangements to allow for the legal transfer of title without the need for foreclosure. What folks needs to understand is that action NEVER results in screwing the developer.
There is not a difference in executor notifying HOA that the timeshare is not being passed on to beneficiaries or the beneficiaries notifying that they don't want the timeshare. I don't see how the cost to HOA is different. The HOA has to take back the deed in both situations. They do not need to undergo foreclosure.
 
There is not a difference in executor notifying HOA that the timeshare is not being passed on to beneficiaries or the beneficiaries notifying that they don't want the timeshare. I don't see how the cost to HOA is different. The HOA has to take back the deed in both situations. They do not need to undergo foreclosure.
When it is deeded property, the problem is that an HOA cannot simply "take back" the ownership without a legally prepared deed being recorded. When the owner has died, the ONLY way for a deed to be legally prepared is for an ancillary probate to be opened and the executor obtains court approval to complete the transaction. If the owner has not died, and has a DPOA in place, then the DPOA can execute the deed. Once the owner is dead, the HOA has no ability to simply "take back." No matter what, a legal proceeding must be involved, whether it is an ancillary probate or a foreclosure. The problem with a foreclosure, is state law dictates the amount of time that must pass with unpaid MFs before a proceeding can commence. That statutory period varies by state. It is typically around 5 years. There are no other avenues outside of a foreclosure or ancillary probate, UNLESS the ownership is held in trust. When in trust, the successor trustee holds the legal ability to convey the ownership to the HOA.

I do not understand why you believe that a deed-back can occur after the death of the owner. It cannot, absent a legal proceeding as I've described. BTW - the difference between an executor and a beneficiary notifying the HOA that the timeshare is not wanted is the executor has a fiduciary obligation to close out the estate and dispose of all assets of the decedent. Walking away and leaving the timeshare owned by a dead person is a breach of the executor's fiduciary duty and can result in personal liability for the executor. Moreover, the executor cannot close the estate until the assets are gone.
 
You are going far away from estate planning for timeshare owners if you are going to start talking about Medicare look back periods for fraudulent transfers, etc. What you are also missing is that when folks set up trusts to avoid paying healthcare costs or long term living costs they are not setting up a revocable living trust. That is an asset of the grantor. You are also misinformed about the process upon death of a grantor of a revocable living trust Bill. Discovery doesn't commence. A fraudulent conveyance action isn't started. Rather, the burdened HOA and fellow owners must wait the statutory period to proceed with a foreclosure action in order to recover title to the timeshare. That may be 5 years. It could be longer. Why do you want to burden your HOA like that? If that is your goal, then give the timeshare away before you die for goodness sake. And just a note, your approach completely ignores the fiduciary duties of your estate representative, whether an executor or a successor trustee. Debts of the decedent must be paid prior to distribution of the trust assets. Failure to do so is a breach of fiduciary duty. But again, that is a long ways away from the concept of estate planning for timeshare owners.

I did change my post to include the word irrevocable.

In an irrevocable trust there are no personal assets that would exceed State requirements for probate.

The reason why I have no sympathy for any of the HOA's and resort corporations is their product is flawed because of a lack of exit programs. Their contracts should include a provision to quicken foreclosure if the client passes away and no steps up to take the contract.

You can argue that the estate representative has a duty to contact the resort or hoa but that really isn't the case. The duties end at probate. When the assets are in a irrevocable trust and the client passes away with less than the minimum State requirement for probate there is no obligation to contact anyone. They can do their own discovery and if they wish to chase zero's with dollars that would be foolish, imo.

Debts inside the trust must be paid but personal debt outside of the trust would be dealt with at probate. Usually, there is nothing personal left to probate in this situation so the debt would go unsettled.

Bill
 
Top