Just got out of a presentation at MGO. We own two legacy weeks and they pushed hard that weeks are very hard to use, book, trade, and the points are super easy and you can get what you want 96% of the time. Then, when I mentioned doing an amnesty program and enrolling the weeks, I was told the enrolled points are not the same as the real points and it would be harder to book than buying real points. That is, until the closer came in with the offer and express how the enrolled points and the new points are the same and can be combined for status and for booking. The first lady was frustrating enough that it eliminated any desire we had to purchase.
My condolences---it shouldn't be that way.
Sounds like the same lady we had this past February at MGO....(btw, we only went for the incentives).....but she was so awful repeating previously debunked "phrases and facts"
(aka "lies") that for the very first time in our 25 year ownership we are considering never doing it again "despite the sometimes usable gifts".
Her tack was the old disproven advice that we could buy trust points which were going to super-charge our enrolled points.
That didn't last long because I flat-out smiled and said "oh please, that's an old one, and you KNOW it's not the case".
She kept repeatedly patting herself on the back so much, and touting her many accomplishments with "high-end clients", and extolling the advantages of doing things her way,
that we just got truly sick of her spiel and exited quicker than usual. I had stopped her a couple of times and called her bluff on some of the statements,
and when she tried to explain, it only blew wide open that she was bending the truth with out & out lies.
She finally realized that we were more well-schooled than she thought, and experienced to boot,
so she had to wind it down quickly or be thoroughly embarrassed more. She finally had no more comebacks because she was obviously spinning, bobbing, and weaving.
Not exactly a complimentary set of tactics when she was supposedly "one of the best".
She said she usually only "presented" to the highest percentile of owners with the most superior portfolios....
if so, why was she "fast-talking" and telling untruths and moving on so quickly?
Definitely not impressed.