- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Messages
- 4,929
- Reaction score
- 4,303
- Location
- Rural Alabama
- Resorts Owned
- DVC:
Grand Californian
Copper Creek
Beach Club Villas
Hilton Head Island
Marriott:
Barony Beach
Mountainside
Update on the Garmin
Ive been meaning for awhile to come back and post a follow-up on the Garmin and I was reading through the old posts. I have been bitten badly by the cycling bug and lol on the question "how many miles can you really ride in a year?". The answer to that is my case is 3000 and i don't even consider that to be a lot. My first century (100 mi) ride is this coming Saturday. I have trained a lot for it though, including training rides of 75, 80 and 93 miles, so I'm feeling pretty good about it. I am totally intrigued by the whole training process and can't even conceive of riding without my Garmin and associated data. I even really want to buy a power meter (a better training tool than HR monitor) but I am in the process of buying a fancy new bike and don't want to spend the money or take the time to research yet another piece of bike equipment.
So the bottom line is: For me, the Garmin is an indispensable training tool. HR, speed and cadence sensors are critical numbers that I track throughout my rides and also on my stationary trainer (well, not speed on the trainer). The ability to upload data to your personal page on the Garmin site and then later analyze that data in all sorts of ways is also crucial when you are training a little more formally like I am. The GPS mapping feature is of zero use to me, it turns out. But what I did not realize when I bought the Garmin is that the GPS feature allows me to send an email link to anyone I want and then that person can track me in real time. This is very important when I do long rides alone, Mr. H can track my progress and "keep and eye on me". So it turns out I bought exactly the best unit for me, even though I kind of lucked into it.
So two thumbs up on the Garmin, at least for cyclists who want to train for an event.
H
Ive been meaning for awhile to come back and post a follow-up on the Garmin and I was reading through the old posts. I have been bitten badly by the cycling bug and lol on the question "how many miles can you really ride in a year?". The answer to that is my case is 3000 and i don't even consider that to be a lot. My first century (100 mi) ride is this coming Saturday. I have trained a lot for it though, including training rides of 75, 80 and 93 miles, so I'm feeling pretty good about it. I am totally intrigued by the whole training process and can't even conceive of riding without my Garmin and associated data. I even really want to buy a power meter (a better training tool than HR monitor) but I am in the process of buying a fancy new bike and don't want to spend the money or take the time to research yet another piece of bike equipment.
So the bottom line is: For me, the Garmin is an indispensable training tool. HR, speed and cadence sensors are critical numbers that I track throughout my rides and also on my stationary trainer (well, not speed on the trainer). The ability to upload data to your personal page on the Garmin site and then later analyze that data in all sorts of ways is also crucial when you are training a little more formally like I am. The GPS mapping feature is of zero use to me, it turns out. But what I did not realize when I bought the Garmin is that the GPS feature allows me to send an email link to anyone I want and then that person can track me in real time. This is very important when I do long rides alone, Mr. H can track my progress and "keep and eye on me". So it turns out I bought exactly the best unit for me, even though I kind of lucked into it.
So two thumbs up on the Garmin, at least for cyclists who want to train for an event.
H